Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 457 Download : 1980

Main Article Content

Abstract

The problem of euthanasia has existed since the health community was facing an incurable disease, while the patient was already dying and torturing. In such situations, it is not uncommon for patients to beg for relief from this suffering and do not wish to have their life extended. This is where the term euthanasia appears, which is letting go of one's life in order to be free from suffering or to die properly. This study aims to determine the concept of freedom to live, human freedom to choose and review legal norms in Indonesia and several other countries. However, in its application there is a dilemma, which is considered contrary to the right to life if euthanasia is carried out. This research is a legal research with an approach obtained by examining library materials or secondary data or what is called normative legal research or literature law research. The approach in research uses aConceptual Approach, which is an approach that departs from the views or doctrines that develop in legal science to build legal arguments when solving legal issues at hand. From this legal research study, it can be concluded that the presence of euthanasia is considered a human right in the form of the right to die which is considered to bring happiness and pleasure to him. Eutanasia when viewed from the aspect of criminal law and human rights in Indonesia are still having a debate that has not found the end, for the provision of human rights by the opposition national laws, especially the Criminal Code so there needs to be development of the law on regulation of euthanasia in Indonesia by taking into account medical factors normative.

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Nugraha, X., Adiguno, S., Yulfa, S., & Lathifah, Y. (2021). ANALISIS POTENSI LEGALISASI EUTANASIA DI INDONESIA : DISKURSUS ANTARA HAK HIDUP DENGAN HAK MENENTUKAN PILIHAN. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 6(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.6.1.39-59
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amiruddin, M. (2017). Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Euthanasia Di Negara Yang Menganut Sistem Hukum Eropa Kontinental Dan Sistem Hukum Anglo Saxon. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 83-102.
  2. Baker, P. (2016). Human Rights and the Law. Australian Human Rights Commission, 6(3).
  3. Bhavya, A. R. (2019). Euthanasia: An Indian Perspective. ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(6), 367-373.
  4. Debora, Y. (2017). Permintaan Suntik Mati Yang Kotroversial, https://tirto.id/permintaan-suntik-mati-yang-kontroversial-cokd, diakses pada 13 November 2020.
  5. Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  6. Faiz, P. M. (2015). Pendekatan MK Terhadap Konstitusionalitas Hukuman Mati. Majalah Konstitusi No. 96.
  7. Ferreira, N. (2005). Revisiting Euthanasia: A Comparative Analysis of a Right to Die in Dignity. SSRN Electronic Journal, 4(8), 1-66.
  8. Halim, A. (2012). Euthanasia Dalam Perspektif Moral Dan Hukum. Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Al-Mazaib, 1(4), 1-13.
  9. Hayati, N. (2004). Euthanasia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Kaitannya Dengan Hukum Pidana. Lex Jurnalica, 1(2), 90-99.
  10. Koeswadji, H. H. (1998). Huum Kedokteran Studi Tentang Hubungan Hukum Dalam Mana Dokter Sebagai Salah Satu Pihak. Jakarta: PT. Aditya Bakti.
  11. Leenen, “Rechten van Morsen Inde Gezcnheidszorg” on Supriati Tjahjaningtyas (1986). Euthanasia Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana Yang Berlaku Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga
  12. Mahmudi, S. S. (1986). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT. Grafindo Persada.
  13. Manahan, K. (2018). Euthanasia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Politik Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. USU Law Jornal, 6(3), 110-118.
  14. Mariana Parreiras Reis de Castro, e. (2016). Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Western Countries: A Systematic Review. The Revista Bioetica Research 24,(2).
  15. Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  16. Natasha, C. (1996). Euthanasia- the Australian Law in an International Context Part I : Passive Voluntary Euthanasia Research Paper.
  17. Nugraha, X. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Asas Safety Beyond Economic Reason Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 41/PUU-XVI/2018. Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani), 216-228.
  18. Nugraha, X. R. I. (2019). Rekonstruksi Batas Usia Minimal Perkawinan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum. Lex Scientia Law Review, 3(1), 40-54.
  19. Nowak, M. (2005). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights : CCPR Commentary / Manfred Nowak. . Germany: Arlington.
  20. Nurmawati, N. G. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Euthanasia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Kertha Wicara, 8(10), 1-13.
  21. Paulus, P. K. (2013). Kajian Euthanasia Menurut HAM (Studi Banding Hukum Nasional Belanda). Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 21(3): 117-139
  22. Pradjonggo, T. S. (2016). Suntik Mati (Euthanasia) Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Pidana Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewaganegaraa, 1(1), 56-63.
  23. Satriana, M. W. (2018). Efektifitas Pengaturan Euthanasia Dalam KUHP Terhadap Pasien Penderita Kanker Dengan Kondisi Inpersistent Vegetative State. Seminar Nasional Riset novatif 6.
  24. Siregar, R. A. (2015). Euthanasia Dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum to-ra, 1(3), 193-200.
  25. Suwarto. (2009). Euthanasia Dan Perkembangannya Dalam Kitab Undang - Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 27(2), 169-176.
  26. Ven, J. A. (2010). Human Rights or Religious Rules?. . Leiden, Boston: Brill.
  27. Zaccaria, H.-G. Z. (2019). Euthanasia, Abortion, Death Penalty and Religion : The Right to Life and Its Limitations: International Empirical Research. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
  28. Zdenkowski, G. (2015). Human Rights and Euthanasia. Deutsches Zentralblatt fur Krankenpflege 11(1).