Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 18, 2024
Accepted
May 27, 2024
Published
June 30, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 152 Download : 91

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Lettuce is a horticultural plant with a short harvest time that is a popular vegetable choice for planting in polybags in urban areas. Planting media for cultivating plants in  polybags vary widely. The use of nutrient-poor and acidic subsoil in Ultisols as a planting medium requires additional organic matter and lime that are suitable for the plants. This study evaluated the use of subsoil as a medium for growing lettuce by adding chicken manure and dolomite. The Completely Randomized Design was used, which consisted of two factors and 6 replications. The first factor was the dose of chicken manure consisting of: 0 ton/ Ha, 10 tons/Ha (38g /polybag), 20 tons/ Ha (76g/ polybag), and 30 tons/ Ha (115g /polybag). The second factor was the dolomite dose, consisting of no dolomite, 1xAl-exch, and 2xAl-exch. A dose of 20 tons /Ha of chicken manure combined with   1xAl-dd of dolomite increased the growth of plants. The treatment of chicken manure at 20 tons/Ha showed growth and yield of lettuce that were as good as a treatment dose of 30 tons/ Ha. The highest fresh weight (123.05g) was obtained from 30 tons/Ha-chicken manure treatment. The appropriate dose of dolomite for lettuce growth and yield was 1xAl-exch, which resulted in a plant fresh weight of 121.12 g. Subsoil is suitable to be used as a medium for planting lettuce in polybags by adding chicken manure or dolomite.


 Keywords: organic matter, marginal soil, leafy vegetable, container veg production

Article Details

URN
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0001AA.27.1.1-6
License

Copyright (c) 2024 Reza Junita Okta Viani, Merakati Handajaningsih, Eko Suprijono, Marwanto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biographies

Reza Junita Okta Viani, The University of Bengkulu

Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bengkulu

Eko Suprijono, The University of Bengkulu

Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bengkulu

Marwanto, The University of Bengkulu

Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bengkulu

How to Cite
Viani, R. J. O., Handajaningsih, M., Suprijono, E., & Marwanto. (2024). Performance of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Grown under Ultisol Subsoil with Chicken Manure and Dolomite. Akta Agrosia, 27(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31186/aa.27.1.1-6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amanullah, M. M., S. Sekar, and P. Muthukhirsnan, 2010. Prospects and potentia of poultry manure. Asian J. of Plant Sci. 9(4): 172-182.
  2. Astuti, K., Susilawati, and M. Sefrila. 2018. Karakter pertumbuhan tanaman bawang merah pada berbagai komposisi media tanam. J. Hort. Indonesia 9(3): 167 – 173.
  3. Atmaja, T., M.M.B. Damanik, and Mukhlis. 2017. Pengaruh pemberian pupuk kandang ayam, pupuk hijau, dan kapur CaCO3 pada tanah ultisol terhadap pertumbuhan tanaman jagung. J. Agroekoteknologi 5 (1): 208 -215
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. 2022. Statistik Pendapatan. Jakarta. Indonesia.
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. 2023. Statistik Pendapatan. Jakarta. Indonesia.
  6. Dikinya, O. and N. Mufwanzal. 2010. Chicken manure-enhanced soil fertility and productivity: Effects of application rates. J. of Soil Sci. and Env. Management 1(3): 46–54. http://www.academicjournals.org/JSSEM.
  7. Duruigbo, C.I., J.C. Obiefuna, and E.U. Onweremadu. 2007. Effect of poultry manure rates on soil acidity in an Ultisol. Intl. J. Of Soil Sci. 2(2): 154 – 158.
  8. Ferrarezi, R.S., X. Lin, A. C. G. Neira, F.T. Zambon, H. Hu, X. Wang, J. Huang, and G. Fan. 2022. Substrate pH influences the nutrient absorption and rhizosphere microbiome of Huanglongbing-Affected grape fruit plants. Front. Plant Sci, Vol. 13. https://doi.org/10/3389/fpls.2022.856937.
  9. Handajaningsih, M., H. E. Saputra, , Marwanto, M., and A. P. Yuningtyas. 2019.. Modification of growing medium for container melon (Cucumis melo L.) production using goat manure and dolomite. Intl. J. on Advanced Sci. Engineering Information Techn. (IJASEIT) 9(2): 441 – 447.
  10. Handajaningsih, M., H. Pujiwati, and D. P. P. Nasution. 2021. Improving yield and performance of shallot on ultisol through application of dolomite and chicken manure. Proc. Intl. Seminar on Promoting Local Resources for Sustainable Agric. And Dev.(ISPLRSAD 2020). Advances in Biol. Sci. Res. Vol. 13: 310 -313.
  11. Ikram, M., A. M. Sanusi, and Ansar. 2015. Hubungan Tingkat Pendapatan dengan Tingkat Konsumsi Masyarakat di Kecamatan Bontonompo Kabupaten Gowa. Balance: Jurnal Ekonomi 11(1): 1 – 10.
  12. Joniken, R. 1984. Comparison of and correlation between the characteristics of agricultural topsoil and subsoil at the southern coastof Finland. J. Agric. Sci. in Finland. 56: 245 – 254.
  13. Munoz, M. A., O. Colberg, and J.A. Dumas.. 1990. Chicken manure as an organic fertilizer. J. Agric. Univ. P.R. 74 (2): 139 – 144.
  14. Ning, L., X. Xu, Y. Zhang, S. Zhao, S. Qiu, W., Ding, G Zou, and P. He. 2022. Effects of chicken manure substitution for mineral nitrogen fertilizer on crop yield and soil fertility in a reduced nitrogen input regime of North-Central China. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1050179. Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1050179.
  15. Nugroho, A., H. Gusmara, and B. W. Simanihuruk. 2019. Dampak residu lumpur sawit dan dolomit terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil kacang tanah (Arachis hypogaea L.) di ultisol. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 21(2): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.31186/jipi.21.2.91-98
  16. Pamungkas, I., E. Turmudhi, and K. S. Hindarto. 2017. Growth and yield response of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea L.) to the mix of peat and mineral soil with several dosage of dolomite. Akta Agrosia 20(2): 54 – 60.
  17. Pangaribuan, D. H., Sarno, Y. Liliana, and S. Bahriana. 2020. Effects of chicken compost and KCl fertilizer on growth, yield, post-harvest quality of sweet corn and soil health. Agrivita 42(1): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v42i1.1805
  18. Purba, J. H., P. S. Wahyuni, and I. Febryan.. 2019. Kajian pemberian pupuk kandang ayam pedaging dan pupuk hayati terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil petsai (Brassica chinensis L.). Agricultural J. 2 (2): 77 – 88.
  19. Rasool, A., A. Ghani, R. Nawaz, S. Ahmad, K. , Shahzad, A. Rebi, B. Ali, J. Zhou, M.I. Ahmad, M. F. Tahir, M. S. Alwahibi, M. S. Elshihk, and S. Erchisli. 2023. Effects of poultry manure on the growth, physiology, yield, and yield – related traits of maize varieties. ACS Omega 8: 25766 – 25779.
  20. Suhartati and M. K. Allo. 2022. The use of various composition media and additional compost to stimulate the growth of jabon putih (Neolamarckia cadamba (Roxb.) Bosser) seedlings. J. Penelt. Kehutanan Wallacea 11(2):101 – 109.
  21. Zamzani, A., R. I. W. Puri, A.A. Jawi, H. U. Putri, and D. W. Cahya. 2023. The effectiveness of organic fertilizer of chicken, cow, and sheep manure against the growth of cabbage, caisim, chicory plant vegetatively. Proc. Intl. Conf. on Religion, Sci, and Educ. 2: 591 – 596.