Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 30, 2018
Accepted
June 30, 2018
Published
July 5, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 827 Download : 319

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Peanut plant production has decreased almost every year, caused by several factors such as cultivation techniques, diseases, varieties, competition with other commodities and the increasingly narrow land area. One effort to improve the yield of peanuts by optimizing ultisol land for cultivation of plants. Ultisol soil is one of acid soils, high Al content, low organic matter content, and low cation exchange capacity. Provision of fertilizer is one effort made to maximize the use of ultisol land. This study aims to determine the optimal dose of cow manure and phosphorus fertilizer for peanut plants and to determine the dose of cow manure and the appropriate dose of phosphorus fertilizer for peanut plant. The design used in this experiment was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two factors arranged factorially. The first factor was dosage of cow manure consisting of 4 treatment levels i.e. 0 ton ha-1, 10 ton ha-1, 20 ton ha-1 and 30 ton ha-1. The second factor is phosphorus fertilizer (SP-36) consisting of 3 levels i.e. 0 kg ha-1, 100 kg ha-1 and 200 kg ha-1. From these two factors, there were 12 treatment combinations each treatment was repeated 3 times, so that 36 experiments were obtained. The results showed that the dosage of cow manure did not significantly affect the growth and yield of peanut plants. The dosage of phosphorus fertilizer did not significantly affect all variables of observation except on seed weight. The combination of dosage of cow manure and phosphorus fertilizer has no significant effect on the growth and yield of peanut plant.

Keywords: Peanut, Cow Manure, Phosphorus and Ultisol

Article Details

URN
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0001aa.21.1.11-186
License

Copyright (c) 2018 Listati Silitonga, Edhi Turmudi, Widodo Widodo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Silitonga, L., Turmudi, E., & Widodo, W. (2018). Growth and Yield Response of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Cow Manure Dosage and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Ultisol. Akta Agrosia, 21(1), 11–18. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/Agrosia/article/view/4655
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Allard, R.W. 1992. Plant Breeding. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. 336 p.
  2. Arifiana, N and B. Sjamsijah. 2017. F3 Plant Response Selection Of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Genotypes. Agriprima. 1 (1): 50-58.
  3. Asnawi, R and I. Dwiwarni. 2000. Influence of Mulch on Growth and Production of Six Varieties of Chili (Capium Annum Linn.). Tropical Soil Journal 5 (1): 5-8.
  4. Central Bureau of Statistics. 2016. Peanut Production. https://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/874 (Retrieved 13 October 2016).
  5. Bengkulu Agricultural Technology Assessment Center. 2014. Utilization of Dry Dried Land with Intercropping of Corn and Peanut in Bengkulu Province. Bengkulu Agricultural Technology Assessment Center. Bengkulu.
  6. Basuki. 2000. Peanut Crop Response (Arachis hypogaea L.) on the Way of Land Management and Azolla Compost. Essay. Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Brawijaya. Poor.
  7. Dartius. 1991. The Basics of Plant Physiology. USU-Press. Field.
  8. Farizaldi. 2014. The Influence of Giving Fertilizer Cage And Coconut Abat To Centrous Growth (Centrosema pubescens) On Ultisol. Journal of Research Jambi University Series Science. 16 (1): 71-76.
  9. Foth, H. 1994. Fundamentals of Soil Science. Erland. Jakarta.
  10. Gardner, F.P., R.B. Pearce and R.L. Mitchell. 1991. Crop Culture Physiology. UI Press. Jakarta.
  11. Hadisumitro, L. 2002. Compost Maker. The Swadaya spreader. Jakarta.
  12. Hardjowigeno, S. 2003. Soil Science. Mediyatama Sarana Perkasa. Jakarta.
  13. Hartatik, W. and L. R. Widowati. 2010. Pupuk Kandang. Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Research and Development. Bogor
  14. Indria, A.T. 2005. Effect of Soil Treatment System and Organic Giving on Agroforestry and Peanut Growth (Arachis hypogaea L.). Essay. Sebelas Maret University. Surakarta.
  15. Ispandi, A and A. Munip. 2005. Effectiveness of Limitations on Nutrient Absorption and Production of Multiple Ubicayu Clones on Dry Dried Land. Journal of Agricultural Science 12 (2): 125 - 139.
  16. Ministry of Agriculture. 2013. Peanut Agribusiness Development Prospect. Directorate of Various Beans and Tuber Cultivation. Jakarta.
  17. Maesarah, M.M. 2016. The Influence of Dosage of Chicken and Cow Fertilizer on Weed and Peanut Growth (Arachis hipogaea L.) in Coastal Sand. http://repository.upy.ac.id/12/1/ArtikelMeirina20%Maesarah.pdf. (Retrieved May 14, 2017).
  18. Ma'sumah. 2002. Influence of Plant Media and Liquid Organic Fertilizer Concentration on Growth and Tomato Fruit Production (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) In Hydroponics. Essay. Faculty of Agriculture UNS Surakarta.
  19. Congress, Z., D. Aneri and Suprapto. Application of Citric Acid and Oxalate to Reduce Aluminum Poisoning on Soybean Plants. Journal of Agrta Deed. 2 (1): 22-27.
  20. Neltriana, N. 2015. The Influence of Dosage Dung Cattle Manure on Growth and Sweet Potato Result (Ipomea batatas L.). Essay. Faculty of Agriculture Andalas University. Padang.
  21. Pasaribu, P. K. 2014. Growth and Production of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with the Provision of Cattle Manure and Phosphate Fertilizer. Journal of Agroecotechnology. 4 (2): 139-1395.
  22. Pitojo, S. 2005. Peanut Seeds. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
  23. Rao, V.R and U.R.Murthy. 1994. Botany-Morphology and Anatomy of Groundnut, pp.43-95. In smart, J. The Groundnut crop. Chapman and Hall, London.
  24. Rizwan, M. 2010. Evaluation of NPK fertilizer and organic fertilizer on Peanut Plant Growth and Production (Aachis hypogea L.) Scientific Abdi Ilmu. 3 (2): 422-430.
  25. Siahaan, J. L. W. 2006. Effect of Phosphorus Dosage on Two Ambon Curup Banana Puppies Replanting Results. Essay. Cultivation of Pertania. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Bengkulu. Bengkulu.
  26. Simanjuntak, N. N. Sipayung and Mariati. 2014. Growth and Peanut Production Response (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Potassium Fertilizer Dosage and Frequency of Plumbing. Online Journal of Agroecotechnology 2 (4): 1396-1400.
  27. Sudarkoco, S. 1992. Use of Organic Material on Cultivation of Crops on Dry Land and Its Management. Essay. Faculty of Agriculture IPB. Bogor.
  28. Sutanto, R. 2002. Determination of Organic Farming and its Development. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
  29. Sumaryo and Suryono. 2000. Influence of Dose of Dolomite Fertilizer and SP-36 to Number of Roots and Result of Peanut Crop in Latosol Land. Agrosains 2 (2): 54-58.
  30. Suprapto. 2002. Plant Peanuts. Publisher spreader Swadaya. Jakarta.
  31. Suwardjono. 2004. The Influence of Several Kinds of Manure on Peat Growth and Production. http // www.ut.ac.id/journal / suwardjono / efek.htm. On access 12 September 2004.)