Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 4, 2022
Accepted
August 10, 2022
Published
September 26, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 241 Download : 156

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Dairy farming in East Java, particularly in Malang Regency, is supported by several districts such as Karangploso, Ngantang, Ngajum, and Pujon as the dairy production centers. Pujon district is one of the dairy production centers in Malang Regency, reaching 20,411 cattle. This research aims to describe the dairy farmers’ group dynamics condition and determine its group dynamics level. The location was purposively determined by considering the dairy center area in Malang Regency, where the majority population is dairy farmers. The researcher used the descriptive analysis method and selected 50 respondents by Purposive Sampling. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire, interview, observation, and documentation. Furthermore, the results showed that the majority of group dynamics is categorized as “high,” yet only two elements are categorized as “moderate,” namely group structure (70.3%) and group training and development (70,4%). In this view, the high number of group dynamics showed pride and satisfaction with their work performance regarding achieving the group’s goals. Also, good leadership will improve group effectiveness. 


 

Keywords

agriculture dairy cattle farm Group Dynamics

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Orca Oryza Anantha Helian Thus

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Helian Thus, O. O. A., Bakhtiar, A., Ibrahim, J. T., & Rahadi, R. (2022). DAIRY FARMERS’ GROUP DYNAMICS IN “NEW NORMAL” ADAPTATION (A Study Case in Pujon District). Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 21(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.21.2.381-396
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amalia, A. A. (2019). Analisis Hubungan Dinamika Kelompok dengan Efektivitas Kelompok Tani Tranggulasi di Desa Batur, Kecamatan Getasan, Kabupaten Semarang. AGRISAINTIFIKA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 2(2), 94-100. doi:10.32585/ags.v2i2.258
  2. Andarwati, S., Guntoro, B., Haryadi, F. T., & Sulastri, E. (2017). Dinamika Kelompok Peternak Sapi Potong Binaan Universitas Gadjah Mada di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Sains Peternakan, 10(1), 39-46. doi:10.20961/sainspet.v10i1.4838
  3. Astuti, S. I., Arso, S. P., & Wigati, P. A. (2019). Analisis Standar Pelayanan Minimal Pada Instalasi Rawat Jalan di RSUD Kota Semarang. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 4(2), 114–119. doi: doi: 10.14710/jkm.v3i1.11129
  4. Bakhtiar, A., Mahmud, A., Agustina, Y., Novanda, R. R., Thus, O. O. A. H., Fibriyanti, D., & Maisaroh, S. (2022). The Dynamics of Cow Farmer Group towards the Development of Feed Canning Technology. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 16(1), 759–771
  5. Bakhtiar, A., Pulung Sudibyo, R., Indriani, I., & Muhammad Shodiq, W. (2020). The Dynamics of Horticultural Farmers Groups in Malang Regency and Batu City. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial, Ekonomi Pertanian, 14(3), 473-481. doi:10.24843/soca.2020.v14.i03.p09
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik [BPS]. (2017). Statistik Indonesia 2017. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://jatim.bps.go.id/statictable/2019/10/11/877 produksi-susu-perah-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-jawa-timur-kg-2017.html
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik [BPS]. (2020). Statistik Indonesia 2017. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/ indicator/24/469/1/ populasi- sapi-potong--menurut provinsi.html
  8. Daniel, R., Maad, F., & Wibaningwati, D. B. (2021). Dinamika Kelompok Tani Padi Sawah (Oryza sativa L.) di Kecamatan Rumpin, Kabupaten Bogor. Agrisintech (Journal of Agribusiness and Agrotechnology), 2(1), 9-20. doi:10.31938/agrisintech.v2i1.311
  9. Ervina, D., Setiadi, A., & Ekowati, T. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Usaha Ternak Sapi Perah Kelompok Tani Ternak Rejeki Lumintu di Kelurahan Sumurrejo Kecamatan Gunungpati Semarang. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 13(2), 187-200. doi:10.24843/soca.2019.v13.i02.p04
  10. Haq, I. M. N., Nurlina, L., & Alim, S. (2016). Peran Kepemimpinan Ketua Kelompok Peternak Kambing Perah terhadap Keberlanjutan Usaha Anggotanya. Jurnal Sosial Bisnis Peternakan, 5(4), 1–11. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/ejournal/article/view/10158/4590
  11. Hariri, A., Dewi Andaru, S., & Suliyanto, A. (2016). Pengembangan Kelompok Tani Yang Dinamis dalam Pengembangan Agribisnis Hortikultura di Kota Batu. Agriekstensia, 16(2), 269-275. doi:10.34145/agriekstensia.v16i2.5
  12. Hasanah, Y. M., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2017). Evaluasi Program Wajib Belajar 12 Tahun Pemerintah Daerah Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 228-239. doi:10.21831/amp.v5i2.8546
  13. Ibrahim, J. T. (2019). Sosiologi Pedesaan. In Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (pp. 1–185)
  14. Kelbulan, E., Tambas, J. S., & Parajouw, O. (2018). Dinamika Kelompok Tani Kalelon di Desa Kauneran Kecamatan Sonder. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 14(3), 55-65. doi:10.35791/agrsosek.14.3.2018.21534
  15. Kharis, A., & Mutrofin, M. (2019). Pemberdayaan Kelompok Ternak Kambing “Satwa Makmur” Melalui Program CSR
  16. PT. PLN (Persero) di Desa Tubanan. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran Dan Dakwah Pembangunan, 3(1), 97-118. doi:10.14421/jpm.2019.031-05
  17. Lanuhu, N., Jamil, H., Busthanul, N., Demmallino, E. B., & Melinda, I. (2020). Leadership Relations of the Rice Farmers’ Head Group with Group Dynamics in Tugondeng Village. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1), 1-4. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/486/1/012038
  18. Lusiyanti, L. (2020). Kesenjangan Penghasilan Menurut Gender di Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati : Media Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 4(1), 123-138. doi:10.32630/sukowati.v4i1.214
  19. Mahmud, A., Busono, W., Surjowardojo, P., & Tribudi, Y. A. (2020). Produksi Susu Sapi Perah Friesian Holstein (Fh) pada Periode Laktasi yang Berbeda. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 79–84
  20. Malau, L. R. E., Asmarantaka, R. W., & Suharno, S. (2021). Keragaan Koperasi Susu dan Pendapatan Usahaternak Sapi Perah: Sebuah Studi di KPSBU Lembang. Jambura Agribusiness Journal, 3(1), 15–27. doi:10.37046/jaj.v3i1.10370
  21. Muhyidin, M., Arman, C., & Zaenuri, L. A. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Pengetahuan, Sikap, dan Motivasi Peternak Sapi dalam Adopsi Teknologi Inseminasi Buatan di Sumbawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis, 6(3), 304-312. doi:10.33772/jitro.v6i3.6529
  22. Nasution, L. M. (2017). STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF. Jurnal Hikmah, 14(01), 49–55
  23. Noviana, R., Fariyanti, A., & Winandi, R. (2021). Preferensi Risiko Peternak Sapi Perah Di Kecamatan Cisarua Kabupaten Bogor Provinsi Jawa Barat Risk Preference of Dairy Farmers in Cisarua District Bogor Regency West Java Province. Agrisep, 20(1), 1–12. doi:10.31186/jagrisep.20.1.1-12
  24. Nuryanti, S., & Swastika, D. K. S. (2016). Peran Kelompok Tani dalam Penerapan Teknologi Pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 29(2), 115-128. doi:10.21082/fae.v29n2.2011.115-128
  25. Rangga, K. K., Effendi, I., Listiana, I., & Pranata, D. (2019). Hubungan Kepemimpinan Ketua Kelompok Dengan Keefektifan Kelompok Tani Padi Sawah di Kecamatan Sukoharjo Kabupaten Pringsewu. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pangan, 22(2), 131–141
  26. Rosyidi, H., Ibrahim, J. T., Sutawi, S., Anne, O., & Rachmawati, D. (2021). Relationship Of Group Dynamics and Fishermen Independence in Fisheries Agribusiness Attaining Maximum Sustainable Yield. E3S Web of Conferences, 226. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202122600019
  27. Rusdiana, S., & Soeharsono, S. (2019). Upaya Pencapaian Daya Saing Usaha Sapi Perah Melalui Kebijakan Pemerintah dan Peningkatan Pendapatan Peternak. Agriekonomika, 8(1), 36-50. doi:10.21107/agriekonomika.v8i1.5111
  28. Statistik, badan pusat. (2020). Peternakan Dalam Angka 2020. (Subdirektorat Statistik Peternakan, Ed.) (katalog:53). jakarta: © BPS-RI/BPS-Statistics Indonesia
  29. Utami, A. W., Salman, L. B., & Firman, A. (2020). Analisis Efisiensi Teknis pada Usaha Sapi Perah di Kecamatan Tanjungsari. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 6(1), 254-264. doi:10.25157/ma.v6i1.3087
  30. Wildan Jadmiko, M., Ayu Harsita, P., Widodo, N., & Setyo Poerwoko, dan M. (2019). Sumber Daya Internal Peternak Sapi Perah dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Dinamika Kelompok dan Konteks Kerentanan Internal Maret, 7(1), 192–200
  31. Yani, D. E., & Faridha, I. (2018). Analisis Dinamika Kelompok Sentra Penyuluhan Kehutanan Dan Pedesaan Mangga Delima Taman Nasional Karimunjawa. JSEP (Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics), 10(3), 58-67. doi:10.19184/jsep.v10i3.7009