Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 121 Download : 95

Main Article Content

Abstract

Hope Family Program (HFP) commenced in 2007 served as a part of social security for the very poor households (VPH) to get their descent out from the poverty trap. HFP is focused on health and education sectors since both sectors are the core for life improvement of society. It has been implemented in 33 provinces with varying effectiveness. The purposes of this study were to identify the effectiveness of HFP implementation in Wanayasa Village, Wanayasa Sub-district, Purwakarta Regency and to reveal various related aspects that could potentially impact the success of the program. The study was conducted using quantitative descriptive approach by involving 41 participants from VPH joining to HFP implemented in the village as the respondents. A SWOT analysis was performed to explore the underlying issues as to the effectiveness, coverage, and sustainability of the program. In most cases, the respondents acknowledged that HFP had been well implemented and the received cash was sufficient to cover the expenses for children education and health care. The performed SWOT analysis leads to some offered approaches for the program improvement in the village

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Alatas, V., Cahyadi, N., Ekasari, E., Harmoun, S., Hidayat, B., Janz, E., & Jellema, J. (2011). Program Keluarga Harapan: main findings from the impact evaluation of Indonesia's pilot household conditional cash
  2. transfer program. New York: World Bank.
  3. Banovcinova, A., Levicka, J., & Veres, M. (2014). The impact of poverty on the family system functioning.
  4. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 148-153.
  5. Daryono, D., Asnawi, M., & Hafizrianda, Y. (2017). An analysis of management of Family Hope Program for poor households in Jayapura Municipality. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Daerah, 1(3):
  6. -116
  7. Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self Child development perspectives, 7(1), 43-48.
  8. Ferré, C., & Sharif, I. (2014). Can conditional cash transfers improve education and nutrition outcomes for poor children in Bangladesh? Evidence from a pilot project. The World Bank.
  9. Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. R. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty. The World Bank.
  10. Indonesia Statistics (2017). Poverty and inequality: Dynamic Table. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/site/resultTab.
  11. MIOL/RO. (2017, May 8). Mensos pastikan kesiapan PKH non tunai untuk 6 juta penerima. Media Indonesia.
  12. Retrieved from http://media indonesia.com/read/detail/103856-mensos-pastikan-kesiapan-pkh-nontunai-untuk-6-juta-penerima.
  13. Purwanto, S. A., Sumartono, S., & Makmur, M. (2013). Implementasi kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan
  14. (PKH) dalam memutus rantai kemiskinan (Kajian di Kecamatan Mojosari Kabupaten Mojokerto).WACANA, Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 16(2), 79-96. [In Indonenesian]
  15. Rostyaningsih, D. (2015). Implementasi Program Penarikan Pekerja Anak – Program Keluarga Harapan (PPA-PKH) diKabupaten Magelang.Gema Publica, 1(1): 15-30. [In Indonesian]
  16. Samosir, A. P. (2013). Analisis efektivitas pelaksanaan program keluarga harapan 2011 (Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 9(2): 2008-22. [In Indonesian]
  17. Solekhati, L. (2014). Evaluasi implementasi kebijakan PKH (Program Keluarga Harapan) Studi Kasus Kebijakan PKH di Desa Tepus, Kabupaten Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta (Doctoral dissertation,
  18. Universitas Gadjah Mada). [In Indonesian]
  19. Son,H.H. (2008).Conditional cash transfer programs: An effective tool for poverty alleviation?.ERD Policy Brief No. 51, Asian Development Bank.
  20. Statistics Indonesia. 2017. Poverty and inequality: Dynamic Table. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. Retrieved from
  21. https://www.bps.go.id/site/pilihdata.html
  22. The World Bank. (2017). Poverty & Equity Data Portal: Indonesia. The World Bank Group.
  23. Tlonaen, Y. B., Hardiyanto, W. T., & Diahloka, C. (2015). Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Miskin. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 3(1):
  24. -37. [In Indonesian]
  25. Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., & Beardslee, W. (2012). The effects of poverty on children’s mental, emotional and behavioral health: Implications for prevention. American Psychologist 67(4): 272–284.