Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 9, 2025
Published
December 30, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRAK


 


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas penerapan e-worksheet berbasis Metacognition in Science for Higher Education (MiSHE) terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi pada mata kuliah Genetika. Model MiSHE menekankan enam sintaks utama, yaitu Awareness, Essential Question, Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation, dan Reflection, yang dirancang untuk mengembangkan kesadaran berpikir, tanggung jawab belajar, serta kemampuan reflektif mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen semu dengan desain nonequivalent pre-test post-test control group. Sampel penelitian terdiri atas 72 mahasiswa yang dibagi menjadi kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa angket motivasi belajar dengan empat dimensi utama, yaitu orientasi keberhasilan, antisipasi kegagalan, inovasi, dan tanggung jawab. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan pada motivasi belajar mahasiswa di kelas eksperimen dibandingkan kelas kontrol dengan nilai signifikansi uji Mann-Whitney sebesar 0,000 dan skor N-Gain sebesar 0,67 (kategori sedang). Penerapan e-worksheet berbasis MiSHE terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan kesadaran berpikir, kemandirian, dan motivasi intrinsik mahasiswa. Dengan demikian, model ini dapat menjadi inovasi pembelajaran yang mendukung pendekatan berpusat pada mahasiswa serta memperkuat motivasi belajar dalam pembelajaran biologi di perguruan tinggi.


 


Kata Kunci : E-Worksheet, Metakognisi, Motivasi Belajar, Genetika, Pendidikan Biologi


 


ABSTRACT


 


This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of implementing a Metacognition in Science for Higher Education (MiSHE)-based e-worksheet on biology education students’ learning motivation in the Genetics course. The MiSHE model emphasizes six main syntaxes: Awareness, Essential Question, Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reflection, which are designed to develop students’ thinking awareness, learning responsibility, and reflective ability. This research used a quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent pre-test post-test control group design. The sample consisted of 72 students divided into experimental and control groups. The instrument used was a learning motivation questionnaire covering four main dimensions: success orientation, failure anticipation, innovation, and responsibility. The findings revealed a significant increase in learning motivation in the experimental group compared to the control group, with a Mann-Whitney significance value of 0.000 and an N-Gain score of 0.67 (medium category). The implementation of the MiSHE-based e-worksheet proved effective in enhancing students’ metacognitive awareness, independence, and intrinsic motivation. Therefore, this model can serve as an innovative learning approach that supports student-centered learning and strengthens learning motivation in biology education at the higher education level.


 


Keywords : E-Worksheet, Metacognition, Learning Motivation, Genetics, Biology Education

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Prendi Niki Halhaji, Ahmad Saddam Husein, Abas, Irwandi Ansori, Syarif Hidayat

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal

Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

DIKSAINS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Halhaji, P. N., Husein, A. S., Abas, A., Ansori, I., & Hidayat, S. (2025). EFEKTIVITAS E-WORKSHEET BERBASIS METACOGNITION IN SCIENCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI PADA MATA KULIAH GENETIKA. DIKSAINS : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksains.6.1.1-12
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Heliyon Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192
  2. Abdelshiheed, M., Zhou, G., Maniktala, M., Barnes, T., & Chi, M. (2023). Metacognition and Motivation : The Role of Time-Awareness in Preparation for Future Learning. ArXiv Preprint, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.13541
  3. Acosta-gonzaga, E., & Ramirez-arellano, A. (2021). The Influence of Motivation , Emotions , Cognition , and Metacognition on Students ’ Learning Performance : A Comparative Study in Higher Education in Blended and Traditional Contexts. 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211027561
  4. Çakır, N. K., & Guven, G. (2019). The Role of Metacognitive Awareness and Motivation of Prospective Primary School Teachers in Predicting Their Academic Achievement in the ‘ Science and Technology Laboratory Applications ’ Course. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(3), 28–43. https://doi.org/https://ijpe.inased.org/makale/893
  5. Damayanti, V., & Novita, D. (2024). Development Problem-Based-Learning Oriented E-worksheet To Train Analytical Skills On Chemical Equilibrium Material. HYDROGEN : JURNAL KEPENDIDIKAN KIMIA, 12(3), 544–561. https://doi.org/https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/hydrogen/index
  6. Deshmukh, N., Borkar, A., Hirkani, M. A., & Jalgaonkar, S. (2025). Role of Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Motivation in Medical Undergraduates’ Academic Performance: An Observational Study. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 13(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2025.105384.2107
  7. Handayani, T., Saulon, B. O., & Maryani, I. (2023). Cakrawala Pendidikan Integrating metacognitive strategies impact in virtual science experiments for undergraduate students ’ hots. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 42(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.51752
  8. Juliana, N., Ampera, D., Farihah, F., Baharuddin, B., & Sinukaban, V. Y. (2024). Digital Student Worksheets to Improving Students ’ Learning Independence. Journal of Education Technology, 8(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i1.75433
  9. Listiana, L., Rosyidah, F., Daesusi, R., & Hamdani, A. S. (2025). Fostering Metacognitive Skills and Learning Motivation Through Hybrid Learning with Innovative Learning Strategies. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 13(2), 335–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-2-335-348
  10. Maryani, I. (2021). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran MiSHE (Metacognition in Science for Higher Education) untuk Meningkatkan Higher-Order Thinking Skills Mahasiswa. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  11. Mitasari, R. A., & Hidayah, R. (2022). Development of E-worksheet based on Problem Based Learning to Improve Student ’ s Metacognitive Ability. Journal of Science Education Research, 6(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v6i2.53067
  12. Puteri, A., & Ardianto, D. (2023). Metacognition Skill Exploration in Six Developing Countries : A Systematic Literature Review Towards Advancing Learning Quality. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 12(3), 340–348. https://doi.org/https://ipa-pasca.unpak.ac.id/pdf/publikasi_ilmiah/anisa-putri-pre-school.pdf
  13. Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(June), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
  14. Rodriguez, D. L., Leyva, T. F., Mero, T. B. B., Cárdenas, G. M. B., & Badillo, F. R. A. (2022). Metacognition and motivational strategies , self- learning : Dynamics of learning to learn. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 549–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.5561
  15. Sesmiyanti, Antika, R., & Suharni. (2019). N-Gain Algorithm for Analysis of Basic Reading. EUDL Proceedings of ICLLE 2019, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://eudl.eu/pdf/10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289527
  16. Siqueira, M. A. M., Gonçalves, J. P., Mendonça, V. S., Kobayasi, R., Arantes-Costa, F. M., Tempski, P. Z., & Martins, M. de A. (2020). Relationship between metacognitive awareness and motivation to learn in medical students. BMC Medical Education, 20(393), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02318-8
  17. Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
  18. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  19. Tocco, A. J., Mehrhoff, L. A., Osborn, H. M., Mccartin, L. F., & Jameson, M. M. (2023). Learning communities promote pedagogical metacognition in higher education faculty. A Journal of Educational Development, 42(1), 224–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.2044
  20. Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Räisänen, M., Hailikari, T., & Parpala, A. (2023). Metacognitive awareness in relation to university students’ learning profiles. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09314-x
  21. Urban, K., Pesout, O., Kombrza, J., & Urban, M. (2021). Metacognitively aware university students exhibit higher creativity and motivation to learn. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42(100963), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100963
  22. Wibowo, W. S., Wasana, M. A., & Muhammad, F. N. (2022). Increasing students ’ higher order thinking skills in science learning through discovery learning assisted by e-worksheet based on Google Docs. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.45860
  23. Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2015). Penelitian, Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.