Main Article Content


In Indonesia, the government through the Ministry of Social Affairs has started to offer social protection measures for people with low economic abilities, one of them is through the Non-Cash Food Assistance (BPNT) program which has been implemented since 2017.The targets for this BPNT program are poor families or communities with the lowest 25% socioeconomic status in the implementation area or vulnerable to social risks. As for the aim is to reduce the burden of KPM expenditure through food fulfillment, provide more balanced nutrition to KPM, increase accuracy of targeting and timing of beneficiaries for KPM,provide choice and control to KPM in meeting food needs, and encourage the achievement of sustainable development goals (Sustainable development Goals/SDGs). Scientific research is conducted to describe implementation of the Non-cash Assistance Program (BPNT) for the urban poor by the Bengkulu City Social Service in 2019.The research method used is descriptive qualitative, which clearly describes the data and facts found in the field. The aspects used by the Riant Nugroho theory application and social regulation No.11 of 2018 concerning the distribution of Non-Cash Food Assistance, namely socialization, planning, implementation and evaluation. From the research results, the authors conclude that the implementation of the BPNT program in the city of Bengkulu in 2019 has not been quite successful.This is evidenced by the existence of several summary interviews that have been conducted. There was a delay in the distribution of funds, lack of socialization and coordination between the implementer and the sub-district and sub-district authorities. BPNT activities at the end caused problems which resulted in the unsuccessful implementation of the BPNT program. The program has not been able to optimally achieve the objectives that have been previously set. the involvement of several program implementers, program implementation mechanisms that are not in accordance with what is stipulated in the implementation guidelines, as well as programs that are judged to be inappropriate with existing conditions in the field. As for the recommendation to make the implementation of this policy successful, it is necessary to have the involvement of all implementing parties in program implementation, it is necessary to readjust the program objectives with the current conditions of KPM in the community.


implemntation social impact impelentasi dampak sosial

Article Details

How to Cite
fauzan aziman, muhammad. (2022). ANALISI DAMPAK SOSIAL PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR DESA SUNDA KELAPA KECAMATAN PONDOK KELAPA KABUPATEN BENGKULU TENGAH . Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Dan Kebijakan Publik (DMKP), 2(2), 36–41. Retrieved from


  1. Baker, J. L. 2004. Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners. Directions in Development. The World Bank. Washington, D.C.
  2. Charles O. JonesdanDavid Carr Baird. 1991. Pengantarkebijakanpublik (public policy). Rajawali.
  3. Dunn, William N. 2000. Analisa Kebijakan Publik, Gajah Mada Pers, Yogyakarta.
  4. Finsterbusch, Kurt and Annabelle Bender Motz 1980. Sosial Research for Policy Decisions. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  5. Islami, Irfan. 2002. Prinsip-prinsip Perumusan Kebijakan Negara, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
  6. Moleong, Lexy J. 2000. MetodePenelitianKualitatif, RemajaRosdakarya Bandung.
  7. Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative and Research Methods. SAGE Publication, Newbury Park, California.
  8. Pranarka. 1996. Pemberdayaan: Konsep, Kebijakan, danImplementasi, PustakaSinarHarapan. Jakarta.
  9. Stame, Nicoletta. 2004. Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity, Sage Journals Online.
  10. Sugiyono. 2009. MetodePenelitianKuantitatif, Kualitatifdan R & D. CV.ALFABETA
  11. Wahab, Solichin Abdul. 1990. Pengantar Analisis Kebijaksanaan Negara, Jakarta: LP3ES
  12. Wahab, Solichin Abdul. 2002. AnalisisKebijaksanaan: dariFormulasikeImplementasiKebijaksanaan Negara, Jakarta :SinarGrafika
  13. Wibawa, Samodra, dkk. 1994. Evaluasi Kebijakan publik. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
  14. Winarno, Budi. 2002. Teori dan Proses Kebijakan Publik, Media Presindo,Yogyakarta
  15. SuhardidanSunarti, S. (2009). Sosiologi 1: Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X Program IPS (PDF). Jakarta
  16. Keith Davis. 1962. Human Relations at Work, (New York, San Francisco, Toronto, London: 1962
  17. Soemardjan,Soemardi. 1974.Setangkai Bunga Sosiologi, Jakarta, Lembaga Penerbitan Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia
  18. Anonim.2020. profilDesaSundaKelapa