Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective of research was to evaluate backward (BL) and forward linkages (FL) and to determine key sectors which have large contribution to Bengkulu economy. The linkages and key sector analyses were applied to the Bengkulu Input-Output Tables 2000. The results showed that the structure of the Bengkulu economy still remain dominated by agricultural sectors.  Three agricultural sectors, i.e, palm oil, other agriculture, husbandary and their products,  were the key sectors in Bengkulu economy indicated by strongest BL and FL indexes and they would be fundamental sectors for economic development in Bengkulu.

 

Article Details

How to Cite
Sukiyono, K., Romdhon, M. M., & Nabiu, M. (2017). KETERKAITAN SEKTOR DAN SEKTOR UTAMA DALAM PEREKONOMIAN PROPINSI BENGKULU: ANALISA INPUT- OUTPUT. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 9(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.31186/jipi.9.2.77-84

References

  1. Biaas, S., and H. Gurgul. 1998. Hypothesis about the second eigenvalue of the Leontief matrix. Economic Systems Research. 10 : 285–9.
  2. Cai, J. and P. Leung. 2002. The linkage of agriculture to Hawaii’s economy. Economic Issues. University if Hawaii at Manoa. El-
  3. :1 – 8.
  4. Chenery, H. B., and T. Watanabe. 1958.
  5. International comparisons of the structure of production. Econometrica. 26 (4): 487–521.
  6. Defourny, J., and E. Thorbecke. 1984. Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition
  7. within a social accounting framework. Economic Journal. 94:111–36.
  8. Dermorejo, S.K. 2001. Penentuan prioritas sektor
  9. untuk menyumbang kebijkasanaan fiskal dalam era otonomi daerah di Propinsi Jawa Barat. Seminar Progam Pasca Sarjana IPB, Bogor.
  10. Hewings, G. J. D. 1982. The empirical
  11. identification of key-sektors in an economy: A regional perspective. The Developing Economies. 20:173–95.
  12. Hewings, G. J. D., and M. C. Romanos. 1981.
  13. Simulating less developed regional economies under conditions of limited information. Geographical Analysis. 13 (4): 373–90.
  14. Ilyas, M. 2001. Analisis kesiapan potensi ekonomi
  15. wilayah di Sulawesi Tenggara terhadap kemandirian pembangunan dalam pelaksanaan otonomi daerah. Seminar Program Pasca Sarjana IPB, Bogor.
  16. Muchdie. 2002. Aplikasi model input-output
  17. dalam analisis perekonomian wilayah. Pengembangan Wilayah dan Otonomi Daerah (kajian Konsep dan Pengembangan) BPPT, Jakarta.
  18. Rassmusen, P. 1956. Studies in Inter-Sektoral
  19. Relations. Einar Harks, Copenhagen
  20. Sonis, M., and G. J. D. Hewings. 1989. Errors and sensitivity in input-output analysis: new approach. In Frontiers in input-output analysis, eds.
  21. R. Miller, K. Polenske, and A. Rose. Oxford University Press, New York