Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 18, 2019
Accepted
February 6, 2020
Published
March 9, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 432 Download : 326

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Agricultural activities still have a very strategic role in supporting national development, both for economic growth and equitable development. The strategic role of the agricultural sector for economic growth includes: food producers for the population of Indonesia, foreign exchange earners through exports, providers of industrial raw materials, increased employment and business opportunities, increased GDP, poverty alleviation and improvement of agricultural human resources through agricultural extension activities. The purpose of this study is to, (1) Knowing farmers' satisfaction with extension services in farming development in Pidie District, and (2) Knowing the relationship between the quality of agricultural extension services to the development of farming in Pidie District. This research was carried out in the Dayah Syarief Village, Mutiara District, Pidie District. The sample in this study were all farmers who numbered 90 people. The independent variables in this study are: (X1), Response (X2), Confidence (X3), Empathy (X4), Physical Evidence (X5) and Farmer Decision (Y) as the dependent variable. Data is collected using the survey method through a questionnaire filled out by Farmers. The data processing in this study will use the SPSS program (Statistical Package for the Social Science). The satisfaction of farmer with extension services in farming development in Busu Dayah Syarief Village, Mutiara District, Pidie District based on the results of research on Farmer Satisfaction variables obtained an average value of (4.18), so that respondents' assessment of the Farmer Satisfaction variable was influenced by variables of reliability, responsiveness , Belief, empathy and physical evidence. The relationship of the quality of agricultural extension services to the development of farming in Busu Dayah Syarief Village, Mutiara District, Pidie District, based on the results of the analysis concluded that of the five variables studied, it turns out the Confidence variable (X3) has the most dominant influence of 0.422% on Farmer Satisfaction. The relationship between the dependent and independent variables is each variable Reliability (X1), Responsiveness (X2), Confidence (X3), Empathy (X4), and Physical Evidence (X5) to Farmer Satisfaction with a correlation index of 0.978 or 97.8 % This means that the relationship is very strong. Then the index of determination of each variable Reliability (X1), Responsiveness (X2), Confidence (X3), Empathy (X4), and Physical Evidence (X5) is 0.957 or 95.7%, this means that the 5 variables have a significant effect towards farmer satisfaction in farming development, and by 4.3% which is influenced by other variables not examined in this study.

Keywords

extension farmers agriculture satisfaction

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Mujiburrahmad, M., Baihaqi, A., & Manyamsari, I. (2020). ANALISIS PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN PENYULUH PERTANIAN TERHADAP KEPUASAN PETANI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN USAHA TANI DI KABUPATEN PIDIE. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 19(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.19.1.83-98
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abubakar dan Amelia, Nani Siregar. 2015. Kualitas Pelayanan Penyuluh Pertanian dan Kepuasan Petani dalam Penanganan dan Pengolahan Hasil Ubi Jalar. Jurnal Penyuluhan Pertanian Vol 5 No. 1.
  2. Asayehegn K, Weldegebrial G, Kaske D. 2012. Effectiveness of Development Agents’ Performances in Agricultural Technology Dissemination: The Case of Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Regional State (SNNPRS), Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development. 4(17): 446-455.
  3. Arikunto. 2006: 131). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Ed Revisi VI, Penerbit PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
  4. A.w. van de Ban dkk. 2009 Penyuluhan Pertanian. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
  5. Bitnar. 2007. Service Marketing (3rd ed.), Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi.
  6. Daryanto. 2014. Pembelajran Tematik, Terpadu, Terintegrasi. Gava Media, Jogjakarta
  7. Departemen Pertanian. 2002. Teknologi Tepat Guna: Budi Daya Petrenakan, Jakarta.
  8. Hamzah. 2011. Faktor Penentu Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian di Kota Tidore Kepulauan Provinsi Maluku Utara. Jurnal Forum Pascasarjana. 34(4): 102-110.
  9. Manyamsari I, Mujiburrahmad. 2014. Karakteristik petani dan hubungannya dengan kompetensi petani lahan sempit. Agrisep 15(2): 58-74
  10. Ikhsan, M. 2013. Kualitas Pelayanan Penyuluhan Pertanian dan Kepuasan Petani dalam Pengembangan Usahatani. Universitas Syiah Kuala
  11. Kotler. 2004. Dasar-dasar Pemasaran. Jilid 1, Alih Bahasa Alexander Sindoro dan Benyamin Molan. Penerbit Prenhalindo. Jakarta
  12. Margono. 2004. Metodelogi penelitian pendidikan. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
  13. Mujiburrahmad. 2014. Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian di Kabupaten Pidie Provinsi Aceh dalam Melaksanakan Tugas dan Fungsinya. Jurnal Penyuluhan. 10 (2). ISSN 1858-2664. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
  14. Nazir. 2011. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
  15. Puspadi. 2010. Model Perilaku Kerja Penyuluh Pertanian. BPTP.
  16. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2006 Tentang Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan.
  17. Sekaran, 2009, Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis, Edisi 4, Buku 2, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
  18. Sezgin A, Eren TK, Atsan T. 2010. Factors Influencing Agricultural Extension Staff Effectiveness in Public Institutions in Erzurum, Turkey. African Journal of Business Management. 4(18): 4106-4109.
  19. Slamet, Margono 2006. Membentuk Pola Perilaku Manusia Pembangunan, IPB Press, Bogor.
  20. Sudjana, Nana dan Ibrahim. 2004: 85. Penelitian Dan Penilaian Pendidikan, Sinar Baru Algensindo, Bandung.
  21. Setiana, L. 2005 Teknik Penyuluhan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
  22. Subagio et al. 2008. Proses Produksi Mocal. http://tepungmocal.ning.com. Diakses pada 3 Oktober 2008)
  23. Sugiyono. 2003. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Edisi 1, Alfabeta, Bandung
  24. Tjitropranoto. 2005. Penyuluhan Pertanian: Masa Kini dan Masa Depan.”Dalam: Membentuk Pola Perilaku Manusia Pembangunan. Diedit oleh: Ida Yustina dan Adjat Sudradjat. Bogor: IPB Press.
  25. Tjiptono, 2012. Pemasaran Strategik. Yogyakarta. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2006 Tentang Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan.
  26. Zahara, Rita. 2015. Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Petani Terhadap Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian Lapangan (PPL) di Kabupaten Pidie. Jurnal Agrisep. Prodi Agribisnis. Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Most read articles by the same author(s)