Main Article Content

Abstract

Urban poverty is still a thorny issue in almost all cities in Indonesia. Urban poverty is grouped into two different characteristics: chronic and transient. Chronic poverty experienced by those who are under the poverty line, while transient poverty experienced by those who are around the poverty line. Unlike the chronic group that is often the target of poverty reduction policies, transient group is often overlooked. They do not exist in the scheme of poverty reduction programs. In fact, the number of transient poor population is about 46 percent, compare to the chronic population that is only 11%. With almost having similar condition with the chronic group, transient group is characterized by unstable income, large spending on food, limited access to drinking water, live in the surrounding slums, and having a low quality sanitation. The question is, how the survival strategy of the neglected transient is able to cope with their difficult life. And the most important thing, what program should be done by the government to deal with transient poverty? This paper will discuss the economic living conditions of transient poor families in urban Bengkulu City, Indonesia, reviews their survival strategy, initiatives and experiences. It also talks about ongoing Green Kampong project promoted by the University of Bengkulu that integrates incomes generation efforts for the transient poor and the commitment of environmental protection through the vegetables planting in every idle land in the kampong area.

Article Details

References

  1. Ancok, D. 2003. Modal Sosial dan Kualitas Masyarakat. Naskah pidato pengukuhan jabatan guru besar pada Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
  2. Cohen, D. and L. Prusak. 2001. In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Free Press, New York
  3. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York
  4. Fukuyama, F. 2000. The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. Profile Books, London.
  5. Creswell, J. W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.,California.
  6. Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Mtehods Approaches. Research Design: Pendekatan
  7. Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (translation). Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
  8. Duclos, J. Y. and A. Araar. 2006. Poverty and Equity: Measurement, Policy, and Estimation with DAD. Springer and International Development Centre
  9. Haddad, L. and A. Ahmed. 2003. Chronic and transitory poverty: evidence from Egypt, 1997-99. World Development 31(1): 71-85.
  10. Jalan, J. and M. Ravallion. 2000. Is transient poverty different? evidence for rural China. Journal of Development Studies 36(6): 82-99.
  11. Krishna A., P. Kristjanson, M. Radeny, and W. Nindo. 2004. Escaping poverty and becoming poor in twenty kenyan villages. Journal of Human Development 5 (2):211-226.
  12. McKay, A. and D. Lawson. 2002. Assessing the extent and nature of chronic poverty in low income countries: issues and evidence. World Development 31(3): 425-439.