Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the impact of the Program Titian Saksama Rakyat (PTSR) to the petty traders. PTSR is a microfinance program which focuses on the growth and the development of the micro entrepreneurs in Penang, Malaysia. It was initiated by the Penang Development Corporation (PDC) in co-operation with the Penang State Government in November 2008. Based on the sample of 150 petty traders involved in various business activities, the results showed that the amount of the loan received has a significant effect on their income. In addition, this study revealed that the amount of the loan received and the actual amount of the loan application (whether it is fully approved or not) were significantly affect the success of these traders. The results of the analysis also indicated that, the traders enjoyed significant benefits from the PTSR as this program was able to increase their income, expand their business, lift them out of poverty, improve their ability to increase the amount of deposits and their property, improve the quality of their health and improve their ability to own a house and land. Because of these benefits, these traders are interested and plan to apply for another loan from the PTSR program. This study, therefore, suggests that the PTSR program should be continued as it played significant roles in improving the socio-economic performance of the petty traders.

Article Details

References

  1. ADB. 2000. Finance for the Poor: Microfinance Development Strategy. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/.
  2. Alam M. and M. I. Rafiqul. 2012. The limitations of microcredit for promoting microenterprise in Bangladesh. Economic Annals 57(192): 41-53.
  3. Chong, F. 2010. Evaluating the credit management of micro-enterprises. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics 2(7):149-159
  4. Hallberg, K. 2000. A market-oriented strategy for small and medium scale enterprises (Vol. 63). World Bank Publications.
  5. Hossain, F. 2002. Small loans. big claims. Foreign Policy 12: 79-82
  6. Hulme, D. 2000. Is microdebt good for poor people? A note on the dark side of microfinance. Small Enterprise Development 11(1): 26-28.
  7. Kasim, M.Y. and D. Jayasooria. 2001. Informal economy, micro-finance and non-governmental organisations in Malaysia. Humanomics 17 (1/2):134-140.
  8. Levy, B. 1993. Obstacles to Developing Indigenous Small and Medium Enterprises: An Empirical Assessment.
  9. The World Bank Economic Review 7(1): 65-83.
  10. Mawa. 2008. Impact of microfinance: Towards achieving poverty alleviation? Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences 5(9): 876-882.
  11. Md Saad, N. 2011. Selecting high-income generating activities for micro-entrepreneurs: The case study of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(5): 258-264.