Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 184 Download : 245

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the comparison of Think Talk Write learning models and Creative Problem Solving learning models to the interests and learning outcomes of chemistry in basic chemical law material. This research was conducted in January-May 2019. The research conducted was a kind of quasi-experimental research. The population of this study was class X MIA, totaling 136 students in SMAN 8 Kota Bengkulu in the academic year 2018/2019. Sampling was carried out after the normality and homogeneity test, so the X MIA 2 class was selected using Think Talk Write and X MIA 3 models that used the Creative Problem Solving model with a total of 68. Analysis of the data used was mean, normality test, test homogeneity, interest questionnaire analysis, N-Gain Score test and hypothesis test (t test). In general, both of these learning models are able to increase students 'interest and learning outcomes of chemistry, where the percentage of students' interest in learning chemistry in the Think Talk Write model is 80.5% and categorized as good, for the class of Creative Problem Solving model the percentage is 76.6% and also categorized as good. For the value of N-Gain score on Think Talk Write (TTW) class is and categorized as high while in the Creative Problem Solving class is 0.62 and is categorized as medium. The t-test results on the affective aspects are sig. (2-tailed) of 0.015 and on the cognitive aspect of 0.001. It states that there are significant differences in the interest and learning outcomes of chemistry that apply the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model and Creative Problem Solving

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Pratiwi, G. S., Bahar, A., & Elvia, R. (2019). PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) TERHADAP MINAT DAN HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA SISWA. ALOTROP, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v3i2.10497
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amalia, W, N., Hermansyah Amir , Sumpono., Studi Perbandingan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Menggunakan Model Kooperatif Tipe Take And Give Dan Think Pair Square Di Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Rejang Lebong , Alotrop, 2019: 3(1): 8-14.
  2. Clorawati,A.R., Salastri Rohiat, Hermansyah Amir., Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Bagi Guru Kimia Di SMA Negeri Sekota Bengkulu, Alotrop, 2017 :1(2): 132-135.
  3. Syofiana,N., Salastri Rohiat, Hermansyah Amir., Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match (MM) Dan Team Games Tournament (TGT) Pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Di Kelas X IPA MAN 1 Kota Bengkulu, Alotrop, 2018: 2(2 122-131.
  4. Afandi, M., Evi Chamalah, Oktarina Puspita Wardani, Model Dan Metode Pembelajaran Di Sekolah, Unissula Press , 2013, ISBN: 978-602-7525-64-1
  5. Astiani, F., Amrul Bahar, Hermansyah Amir, Perbandingan Pembelajaran Saintifik Menggunakan Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Fasilitator And Explaining (SFE) Dan Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia , Alotrop, 2018: 3(1): 25-33.
  6. Djalal, F., Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Melalui Pendekatan,Strategi, dan Model Pembelajaran , Sabilarrasyad ,2017:2(1): 31-52.
  7. Winayawati, L., S.B. Waluya, I.Junaedi, Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dengan Strategi Think-Talk-Write Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Rangkuman Dan Pemahaman Matematis Materi Integral, Unnes Journal of Research Mathematics Education, 2012: 1(1): 65-71.
  8. Syazali, M.,Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Berbantuan Maple II Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis , Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika , 2015: 6 (1): 91 - 98 .
  9. Prayitno, A., Pembelajaran Think-Talk-Write Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Soal Geometri, Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 2016: 21(2): 135-141.
  10. Malisa, S.,Iriani Bakti, Rilia Iriani, Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa, Jurnal Vidya Karya, 2018 : 33(1): 1-20.
  11. Purwati, R., Hobri, Arif Fatahillah, Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Persamaan Kuadrat Pada Pembelajaran Model Creative Problem Solving,
  12. Kadikma, 2016: 7(1): 84-93.
  13. Atikasari, G., Ary Woro Kurniasih, Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dengan Strategi TTW Berbantuan Geogebra Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Kelas VII Materi Segitiga, Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 2015: 4(1): 85-94.
  14. Jayanti, E., Peningkatan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Think-Talk-Write Di Kelas X SMA PGRI Indralaya, Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia , 2018: 2 (1): 13-21.
  15. Yuliati, Y., Intan Lestari, Penerapan Model Creative Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Di Sekolah Dasar, Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas , 2019: 5 (1): 32-39
  16. Putri, D.T.N., Gatot Isnani, Pengaruh Minat Dan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Pengantar Administrasi Perkantoran, Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis dan Manajemen, 2015: 1(2): 118-124.
  17. Haster, E., Salastri Rohiat, Sumpono, Studi Komparasi Motivasi Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X Program Peminatan dan Lintas Minat di MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu, Alotrop : 2019: 3(1):57-64.
  18. Saputri,R.J.,Sumpono,Rina Elvia, Perbandingan Hasil Dan Minat Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X IPA Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Snowball Throwing Dan Talking Stick Pada Kurikulum 2013 Di SMAN 10 Kota Bengkulu, Alotrop, 2018: 2(2): 166-174.
  19. Sunyono, I Wayan Wirya, Eko Suyanto, Gimin Suyadi, Identifikasi Masalah Kesulitan Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia SMA Kelas X Di Propinsi Lampung, Journal Pendidikan MIPA (JPMIPA), 2009: 10 (2): 9 –18.
  20. Amir,H., Korelasi Pengaruh Faktor Efikasi Diri Dan Manajemen Diri Terhadap Motivasi Berprestasi Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Bengkulu, Manajer Pendidikan, 2016: 10(4): 336-342.
  21. Syarifuddin, A., Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Belajar Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya
  22. Ta’dib, 2011: 16(1): 113-136.
  23. Rozikin, S., Hermansyah Amir, Salastri Rohiat, Hubungan Minat Belajar Siswa Dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Di SMA Negeri 1 Tebat Karai Dan SMA Negeri 1 Kabupaten Kepahiang,Alotrop, 2018: 2(1): 78-81.
  24. Azrah, M., Penerapan Strategi Think Talk Write (TTW) Dalam Pembelajaran Kooperatif Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas III SD Negeri 009 Tembilahan , Primary , 2017: 6(1): 213-224.
  25. Medianty,S.U.,Amrul Bahar,Elvinawati, Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Dengan Menggunakan Media Video Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPA 1 SMAN 1 Kota Bengkulu , Alotrop, 2018: 2(1): 58-65
  26. Zulhulaifah,N.,Nurhamidah, Elvinawati, Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Course Review Horay (CRH) Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA N 1 Kota Bengkulu, Alotrop, 2018: 2(2): 156-160.
  27. Saleh, M., Strategi Pembelajaran Fiqh Dengan Problem-Based Learning, Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika , 2013: 14(1): 190-220
  28. Nismalasari,Santiani,H.Mukhlis Rohmadi,Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran Harmonis, EduSains , 2016: 4 (2): 74-94.
  29. Wahyuni., N.D, Amrul Bahar, Dewi Handayani, Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Kimia Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dan Think Talk Write , Alotrop , 2017: 1(2) : 144-147.