Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 27, 2018
Accepted
May 27, 2018
Published
May 27, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1378 Download : 2261

Main Article Content

Abstract

[ANALYSIS OF THE CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY FROM CHEMICAL SUBJECTS IN STUDENTS OF CLASS XI IPA SMAN 1 KEPAHIANG] This research aims to know the critical thinking ability of students. Type of this research is descriptive research using quantitative methods. This research was carried out in SMA Negeri 1 Kepahiang on September 2 to 8 may in 2017. The population in this research is the entire class XI IPA are registered on the even-numbered school year 2016/2017 semester. As the samples are taken at class XI IPA 6 of 32 participants.  Data collection is done with the test in the form of reserved descriptions as much as 10 round the whole includes indicators of critical thinking from the taxonomy of Bloom that is level (C2) understand (C3), apply (C4), analyzing and evaluating (C5). Test results obtained from the analysis of results the percentage of students with the ability to answer a question of thinking very critically at 15,6%, quite critical at 53,2 %, and less critical at 31,2 %, with an average value of 61.81. From the average of the values obtained showed that students who have average value included in the category of being. Based on the analysis of the data collected can be inferred levels of critical thinking ability of the students in class XI IPA 6 SMA Negeri 1 Kepahiang at school 2016/2017 academic year can be grouped in a category group are of 53,2 %, middle , 15,6 %  at high group and 31,2 % at low groups. From the results, it can be concluded that overall students in grades at  XI IPA 6 SMA Negeri 1 Kepahiang even 2016/2017 academic year with the ability to enough think critically.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Yunita, S., Rohiat, S., & Amir, H. (2018). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATA PELAJARAN KIMIA PADA SISWAKELAS XI IPA SMAN 1 KEPAHIANG. ALOTROP, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v2i1.4628
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ginting, S.M., Hermansyah Amir., Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Somatis, Auditori, Visual dan Intelektual (SAVI) Berbantuan Media Komputer Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Kimia Fisik II, Exacta, 2012:10(1):98-105
  2. Clorawati,A.R., Salastri Rohiat, Hermansyah Amir., Implementasi Kuri-kulum 2013 Bagi Guru Kimia di SMA Negeri Sekota Bengkulu, Alotrop, 2017 :1(2):132-135.
  3. Elvinawati., Sumpono., Hermansyah Amir., Lessons Study Pada Mata Kuliah Kimia Sekolah I Sebagai Upaya Pening-katan Kualitas Pembelajaran Dan Pemba-ngunan Karakter (Character Building), Exacta, 2012:10(2):156-159.
  4. Yudi, A.A., Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan Ditinjau dari Segi Sarana dan Prasarana (Sarana dan Prasarana PPLP), Cerdas Sifa, 2012:1:1-8
  5. Simanjuntak , N,D,P, Salastri Rohiat, Elvinawati., Hubungan Antara Sarana Laboratorium Terhadap Ketrampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas XI MIPA 5 Di SMA Negeri 3 Kota Bengkulu, Alotrop .2017:1(2):102-105.
  6. Lestari, I.A, Hermansyah Amir, Salastri Rohiat, Hubungan Persepsi Siswa Kelas X MIPA Di SMA Negeri Sekota Beng-kulu Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017 Tentang Variasi Gaya Mengajar Guru Dengan Ha-sil Belajar Kimia, Alotrop, 2017: 1(2): 113-116.
  7. Yonanda, D.A., Peningkatan Pemahaman Siswa Mata Pelajaran PKN Tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Melalui Metode M2M (Mind Mapping) Kelas IV MI Mambaul Ulum Tegalgondo Karangploso Malang, Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 2017: 3(1): 53-63.
  8. Gayatri, E.R.P, Amrul Bahar, Dewi Handayani, Perbandingan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle (5E) dan Two Syay Two Stray, Alotrop , 2017: 1(1):71-74.
  9. Viani,D.S, Amrul Bahar, Elvinawati, Perbandingan Hasil Belajar
  10. Siswa Meng-gunakan Media Chemopoly Game dan Tournament Question Cards, Alotrop, 2017:1(1):55-59.
  11. Subiantoro, A.W., Bahrudin Fatkurohman., Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan Media Koran , Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 2009: 14(2):111-114.
  12. Amalia, N.F., 2014. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Asam Basa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia., 2014:8(2):1380-1385.
  13. Alifa Noora Rahma, Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Inkuiri Berpen-dekatan Sets Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan Untuk Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Empati Siswa Terhadap Lingkungan, Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation (JERE), 2012: 1(2):133-138.
  14. Wasitohadi, F.X. Sudarsono, Zamroni,, Evaluasi Implementasi Paradigma Baru Pendi- dikan Pasca Reformasi Pada Jenjang SD Di Kota Salatiga,, Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 2014:2(2):196-209.
  15. Sari. J, Amrul Bahar, Dewi Handayani. , Studi Komparasi Antara Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan Group Investigation Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa. Alotrop, 2017:1(1):60-65.
  16. Arikunto, Suharsini., 2010, Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi 2010 Cetakan 14) Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta. ISBN 9789800000000
  17. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Edisi 2, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,ISBN :978-602-217-257-4
  18. Fikri. , F.N., Mardiyana., Yemi Kuswardi., Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Facione Pada Materi Program Liniar Ditinjau Dari Minat Belajar Siswa Kelas XI MAN Purwodadi Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017, Jurnal Pendidikan Mate-matika dan Matematika (JPMM) Solusi, 2017 : 1 (2): 20-36.
  19. Damanik, D.P., Nurdin Bukit, Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Sikap Ilmiah Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training (IT) dan Direct Instruction (DI), Jurnal
  20. Pendidikan Fisika, 2013:2(1):16-24.
  21. Kurniasih, A.W., Scaffolding sebagai Alternatif Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika, Jurnal Kreano, 2012: 3 (2) : 113-124.
  22. Ilaah, YF., Yonata, B., Katerampilan Ber-pikir Kritis Siswa SMA Kemala Bhayangkari Surabaya Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri.., Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia. 2015: 1(1):78-79.
  23. Tambak, S., Metode Ceramah : Konsep dan Aplikasi Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam, Jurnal Tarbiyah, 2014:21(2): 375-401.
  24. Sunaryo, Y., Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematik Siswa SMA di Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Pendid-kan dan Keguruan.2014: 1(2):42-43.
  25. Sucipto. Pengembangan Keterampilan Ber-pikir Tingkat Tinggi Dengan Menggunakan Strategi Metakognitif Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan., 2017:2(1):63-67.
  26. Hafid, A., Mengembang Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Teknik Problem Solving. Jurnal Iktiyar, 2007: 5(3):126-129.