Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 1, 2020
Accepted
December 1, 2020
Published
January 21, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 145 Download : 409

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to determine the performance influence of sachets on various sizes of bags and the weight of coffee to the characteristics of the brew of coffee bags. The study uses a completely random design with 2 treatment factors, the first factor of the volume of contents in the bag and the second factor of the packaging bag size. Analyzed With ANOVA dan when the effect is noticeable. It will be followed by using a DMRT at  5%. significant levels. The research at moisture and ash content is suitable for the raw material of coffee bags. Coffee Sari qualified SNI is on the treatment of the volume of 1/4 content and small bag size with a yield of 22.02% coffee juice. The results of the analysis on the missing coffee weight test were obtained the highest value found in the volume of the 1/3 content with a large bag size resulted in 2.73 grams of lost coffee weight. The lowest value is on the 1/2 content volume and the medium size is 0.17 grams. The sensory test was derived that the panelists preferred it to the size of a large bag and the appropriate volume of contents to fill the bag with a volume of 1/3.

Keywords: Bag size and coffee weight, Coffee characteristics.

Keywords

Coffee Characteristics

Article Details

License

An author who publishes in the Jurnal AGRITROPICA agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the Journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Hasil gambar untuk gambar cc by sa

AGRITROPICA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

References

  1. Achadiyah, S. 2007. Study of Making Ginger Coffee (Study of Ginger Coffee Bag Preparation). Agroteknose. 3 (2): 1-6.
  2. Angelia, I. O. 2018. Test Characteristics of Non-Caffeine Coffee from Papaya Seeds with Variation of Irradiation Length (Characteristics Test of Non-Caffeine Coffee With Variation of Papaya Seeds While Irradiation). Journal of Agritech Science. 2 (1): 16-29.
  3. Annishia, F. B, and M. S. Setiawan. 2018. The Effect of Coffee Product Quality on Consumer Satisfaction at Jade Lounge Swissbel Residences Kalibata Jakarta. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism.4 (1): 1–69.
  4. Ardianti, A. D, and K. Fibrianto. 2017. Literature Review: Alkaline Water and Oxygenated Water as Coffee Brewers. Journal of Food and Agro-Industry. 5 (3): 1-5.
  5. Arwangga, A. F, I. A. R. A. Asih and I. W. Sudiarta. 2016. Analysis of Caffeine Content in Coffee in Sesaot Narmada Village Using Uv-Vis Spectrophotometry. Journal of Chemistry. 10 (1): 110-114.
  6. Asiah, N, F. Septiyana, U. Saptono, L. Cempaka, and D. A. Sari. 2017. Identification of Robusta Cibulao Coffee Body Dish Taste at Various Temperatures and Smoothness of Brewing. Barometer. 2 (2): 52-56.
  7. BSNI. 1992. Instant Coffee. SNI 01-2983-1992.
  8. BSNI. 1996. Dipping Coffee. SNI 01-4282-1996.
  9. BSNI. 2004. Coffee Powder. SNI 01-3542-2004.
  10. BSNI. 2006. Organoleptic, and or Sensory Testing Instructions. SNI 01-2346-2006.
  11. Edvan, B. T, R. Edison, and M. Same. 2016. Effect of roasting type and duration on Robusta (Coffea Robusta) Coffee Quality. Aip Journal. 4 (1): 31-40.
  12. Erdiansyah, N. P, and Yusianto. 2012. Relationship of Light Intensity in Gardens with Taste and Profile Profile of Caffeine in Several Robusta Coffee Clones. Pelita Perkebunan. 28 (1): 14-22.
  13. Fajriana, N. H, and I. Fajriana. 2018. Analysis of Caffeine Levels of Arabica Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) on Roasted Temperature Variations in Ultra-Violet Spectrophotometry. Analytes. 3 (2): 148-162.
  14. Herman, R. Rusli, E. Ilimu, R. Hamid, and Haeruddin. 2011. Analysis of Mineral Content in Nipa Fruit Ash (Nypa Fructicans) Kaliwanggu, Kendari Bay, Southeast Sulawesi. J. Trop. Pharm. Chem. 1 (2): 107-113.
  15. Hutasoit, L. 2018. Quality Control of Coffee Receipt Production Through the Taste Test Process at Pt.Volkopi Indonesia by Using Statistical Quality Control. Final Project Reports D-3 Study Program Statistics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of North Sumatra. Field.
  16. Kristiyanto, D, B. D. H. Pranoto, and Abdullah. 2013. Decreasing Arabica Coffee Caffeine Levels With Fermentation Process Using Nzkor Mz-15. Journal of Chemical Technology and Industry. 2 (4): 170-176.
  17. Lawless, H. T, and Heyman. 1999. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principle and Practices. Maryland USA: Aspen Publisher, Inc. Gaithersburg.
  18. Muttalib, S. A., J. Nugroho, and N. Bintoro. 2012. Identification of Blending Aroma of Arabica and Robusta Coffee with Electronic Nose Using a Pattern Recognition System. Proceedings of the Denpasar National Seminar on July 13-14, 154-163.
  19. Nopitasari, I. 2010. The Process of Processing Coffee Powder (Mixture of Arabica and Robusta) And Their Quality Changes During Storage. Essay. Faculty of Agricultural Technology Bogor Agricultural University. Bogor.
  20. Nurhayati, N. 2017. Sensory Characteristics of Dip and Instant Coffee Robusta and Arabica Varieties Sensory Characteristics of Coffee Bag and Instant Coffee of Robusta and Arabica Variety. Journal of Scientific Innovation. 17 (2): 80-85.
  21. Oktadina, F. D., B. D. Argo, and M. B. Hermanto. 2013. Utilization of Pineapple (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) for Decreasing Caffeine Levels and Improving Coffee Flavor (Coffea Sp) in Coffee Powder Manufacturing. Journal of Tropical Agricultural Engineering and Biosystems. 1 (3): 265-273.
  22. Pradipta, K, and K. Fibrianto. 2017. Journal Review of the Difference of Brewed Water on Coffee Multisensory Perception. Journal of Food and Agro-Industry. 5 (1): 85-91.
  23. Purnamayanti, N. P. A, I. B. P. Gunadnya, and G. Arda. 2017. Effect of Temperature and Length of roasting on Physical Characteristics and Sensory Quality of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L). Journal of Beta (Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering). 5 (2): 39-48.
  24. Ditjenbun. 2017. Agricultural Commodities Sub-Sector Coffee Plantation. Secretariat General of the Ministry of Agriculture. Jakarta.
  25. Rahmawati, M. A, and K. Fibrianto. 2018. Sensory Characterization of Robusta Dampit Coffee: Literature Review. Journal of Food and Agro-Industry. 6 (1): 75-79.
  26. Reswita. 2016. Revenue and Value Added of Robusta Coffee Business in Lebong District (Case Study of the Rice Stamp Coffee Business). Agrisep. 15 (2): 255 - 261.
  27. Sari, K, and Yohana. 2015. Food Texture: A Part of Food Properties that is Forgotten in Maintaining the Function of Cognition. Makassar Dent J. 4 (6): 184-189.
  28. Satyajaya, W, A. Rangga, and F. Nurainy. 2014. Consumer Decision Making Process and Instant Coffee Product Attribute in Sachets. Journal of Industrial Technology and Agricultural Products. 19 (2): 297-306.
  29. Sembiring, T.P, A. P. Munir, Sumono, and A. Rohananh. 2014. Roasting Temperature Test on Rotary Type Mechanical Coffee Roasters on Quality of Arabica Coffee (Coffea Arabica). J. Food and Pert Engineering. 2 (1): 109-113.
  30. Siswanto, D, K. A. Damayanti, and V. S. K. Dewi. 2011. Redesign of Instant Coffee Cup Packaging Based on User-Centered Design. Inasea. 12 (1): 22-32.
  31. Sudiyarto, S. W, and D.M. Krishna. 2012. Consumer Behavior Connoisseurs of Tubruk Coffee and Instant Coffee. Jsep. 6 (3): 1-11.
  32. Sudarmadji, S, B. Haryono, and Suhardi. 1997. Analysis Procedures for Food and Agriculture Materials Fourth Edition. Liberty. Yogyakarta. 160 pg.
  33. Sugiantoro, B, Y, B. Praharto, and S. Dahlan. 2015. Appropriate Technology (Ttg) Sachet, Semi-Automatic Coffee Machine for Increasing Production and Expansion of the Temanggungan Coffee Market Segment. ITEKS. 7 (2): 36-41.
  34. Sugito, S. A. 2012. Cider Study as an Alternative to Coffee Product Diversification. Agritech. 32 (1): 98-104.
  35. Suwarto and Y. Octavianty. 2010. Cultivation of Ungulan Plantation. Self-help Spreaders. Jakarta. 260 things.
  36. Syah, H, Yusmanizar, and O. Maulana. 2013. Physical Characteristics of Arabica Coffee Powder from Mechanical Milling with Addition of Corn and Sticky Rice. Indonesian Agricultural Technology and Technology Journal. 5 (1): 32-37.
  37. Tejasari, Sulistyowati, and R. A. A. Sari. 2010. Nutritional Quality and Level of Instant Decafosin Coffee Drinks. AGROTEK. 4 (1): 91-106.
  38. Towaha, J, E. H. Purwanto, and H. Supriadi. 2015. Quality Attributes of Arabica Coffee at Three Altitudes in Garut Regency. J. No: 2 (1): 29–34.
  39. Winarno, F. G. 1993. Nutrition, Technology, and Consumer Food. Gramedia Main Library. Jakarta. 416 p.
  40. Yulisa, L, Y. Indriani, and S. Situmorang. 2013. Consumption Behavior of The University of Lampung Students towards Instant Coffee Powder (The Consumption Behavior of Instant Coffee Powder of the University Student of Lampung). JIIA. 1 (4): 326-333.