Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia is currently experiencing a national identity crisis. This is evidenced by the scientific study of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) that Indonesia is considered not ready to face the phenomenon of globalization in various aspects such as geography, economy, and culture. One effort that can be done by local communities as an effort to deal with the adverse effects of globalization is to use the values of local wisdom as a force. Local wisdom can serve as a filter for values that come from outside that are less suited to local cultural culture. This research is a qualitative research that express comprehensively some cases. The purpose of this research is to explore the potentials of local wisdom of Kediri people include (1) cultural background, (2) social background, and (3) agriculture and irrigation system in three subdistricts namely Kepung Subdistrict, Ngancar Subdistrict, and Semen Subdistrict. The results of this study indicate that (1) the majority of Kediri people are Javanese with strong Javanese custom by performing several rituals for nature conservation, (2) Kediri community social background with religious diversity but all goes well and peaceful and cultural preservation Strongly maintained, (3) the management of agricultural systems and irrigation society is very good and derived from generations of the Kediri kingdom proved by the existence of Harijing inscription.

Keywords

local genius Kediri communities culture

Article Details

How to Cite
Kurnia, I. (2018). Mengungkap Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Kediri Sebagai Upaya Pelestarian Budaya Bangsa Indonesia. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 11(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.11.1.51-63

References

  1. BPS. 2015. Penduduk Kabupaten Kediri. Jakarta.
  2. Kementerian Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Republik Indonesia. 2011. Buku Kearifan Lokal di Tengah Modernisasi. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kebudayaan Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Kementerian Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Republik Indonesia. Jakarta. (Diakses 25 Desember 2015).
  3. Manan, Imran. 1989. Perubahan Sosial Budaya, Modernisasi, dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: P2LPK.
  4. Pidarta, Made. 2007. Landasan Kependidikan: stimulus ilmu pendidikan bercorak Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  5. Samani, Muchlas dan Hariyanto. 2012. Konsep dan Model Pendidikan Karakter. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  6. Sartini. 2004. Menggali Kearifan Lokal Nusantara Sebuah Kajian Filsafat (dalam Jurnal Filsafat). (Internet). (Dikutip 25 November 2013): 37 (2): 111—120.
  7. Dapat diunduh di: http://www.search-document.com/pdf/1/1/Menggali-Kearifan-Lokal-Nusantara-Sebuah Kajian-Filsafati.html.
  8. Stake, Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  9. Suhartini. 2009. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Penerapan MIPA (16 Mei 2009). Yogyakarta. (Internet). (Diakses 25 Desember 2015)
  10. Sukmadinata, , N.S. 2005. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  11. Tim Penyusun. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
  12. ---. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.