Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes farmers’ understanding of farm commercialization and identifies the factors influencing it in South Bengkulu Regency, a leading rice-producing area in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. A total of 88 rice farmers were surveyed using structured questionnaires, and data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. The findings reveal that farmers’ understanding of commercialization falls within the understanding category (average score: 3.51). Among the indicators, price understanding achieved the highest score (3.93), followed by market orientation (3.70). Risk (3.31) and institutional aspects (3.08) remained relatively low. Regression analysis indicates that formal education, farming experience, access to extension services, rice field type (irrigated vs. rainfed), and land size significantly influence farmers’ understanding (R² = 0.624). These results indicate that both internal factors (education and experience) and external factors (extension, irrigation systems, and farm size) jointly determine farmers’ capacity to understand and apply commercialization concepts. Strengthening non-formal education, enhancing extension services, and supporting farmer institutions are essential to improve farmers’ market orientation. Strengthened understanding of commercialization is expected to increase household welfare and contribute to sustainable agricultural development in the region.

Keywords

Farmer understanding rice farming commercialization market orientation

Article Details

References

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Padi 2023. Jakarta: BPS RI.
  2. Carletto, C., Corral, P., & Guelfi, A. (2017). Agricultural commercialization and nutrition revisited: Empirical evidence from three African countries. Food Policy, 67, 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.020
  3. de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2020). Development economics: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  4. Dinas Pertanian Provinsi Bengkulu. (2022). Laporan Tahunan Produksi Tanaman Pangan Provinsi Bengkulu. Bengkulu: Dinas Pertanian.
  5. Fauzan, M. (2024). Beyond the village gate: Commercializing smallholder agriculture in Indonesia. Review of Indonesian Green Growth and Sustainability, 3(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v3i3.400
  6. Hasan, F., & Ihsannudin. (2022). Komersialisasi usahatani cabe jawa (Piper retrofractum) di Madura. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh, 9(2), 503–512
  7. Hayami, Y., & Ruttan, V. W. (1985). Agricultural development: An international perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  8. Hota, S. (2021). Agricultural production and marketable surplus- a study on marketing of paddy. International Journal of Modern Agriculture, 10(2): 4545–4565.
  9. Lestari, A. B., Rahayu, E. S., Marwanti, S., & Antriyandarti, E. (2023). Perubahan perilaku komersial dan marketable surplus para petani padi di Kabupaten Kebumen. Kawistara: The Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 13(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.83441
  10. Mulyani, A. (2017). Peranan pendidikan dalam peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia pertanian. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2(1), 45–56.
  11. Neme, A. A., & Tefera, T. L. (2021). A review on commercialization of smallholder agricultural producers and its impacts on household livelihoods: Evidence from Ethiopia context. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 1(59), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.17306/J.JARD.2021.01393
  12. Ogutu, S. O., Gödecke, T., & Qaim, M. (2020). Agricultural commercialisation and nutrition in smallholder farm households. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 534–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12359
  13. Persson, J. (2025). Livelihood commercialisation and resource use across the border: Explaining environmental income differences in northern Laos and Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics, 177, 103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103529
  14. Saha, A., Harris, J., Nisbett, N., & Thompson, J. (2024). Agricultural commercialisation and food consumption: Pathways and trade-offs across four African contexts. Food Security. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-024-01465-w
  15. Satriani, R., Rosyad, A., Widyarini, I. (2021). Marketable dan marketed surplus beras di Kabupaten Banyumas. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 5(3): 618–631.
  16. Soekartawi. (2002). Prinsip Dasar Ekonomi Pertanian: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
  17. Sugandini, D., Effendi, M. I., Sugiarto, B., Kundarto, M., Hardiastuti, S., & Kawuryan, E. (2023). Resistance to agricultural commercialization with lack of marketing digital adoption in Indonesia’s Dieng Plateau. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(6), 1715–1724. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180607
  18. Widiarta, I. N. (2018). Determinan komersialisasi usahatani padi di Indonesia. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 36(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.21082/jae.v36n1.2018.45-62