Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the implementation of program policies Samisake in Bengkulu city with a case study in Kelurahan Padang Jati, Kecamatan Ratu Samban, Kota Bengkulu. This study used a qualitative descriptive method and data collection was conducted using in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The results showed that the implementation of program policies, especially kelurahan Padang Jati. Samisake is not in line with expectations. Distribution of funds is not in accordance with the expectations of the recipient or public funds. The main goal for the increased revenue and social welfare has been no increase in income and overall welfare of the community yet. Expansion of employment opportunities and the creation of new jobs has not been achieved. So also with the increase in competitiveness of the region has not seen, because the new Samisake programs implemented and in 2014 was the first year of program implementation Samisake. Finally, not the creation of populist economic empowerment by involving city government, business, and community participation participatory. The achievement of expected not in accordance with the objectives of perwal No. 27 Year 2013 on Implementation Guidelines for Management of Revolving Fund Samisake and perwal No. 28 Year 2013 on Technical Guidelines for Management  of Revolving Fund Samisake.

Keywords

Policy Implementation Samisake Policy Implementation Samisake Samisake implementation aspects.

Article Details

Author Biography

sukatno sukatno, bengkulu University

Magister Public Administration, Faculty of Social Science And Political Science, University of Bengkulu

How to Cite
sukatno, sukatno. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PROGRAM SATU MILIAR SATU KELURAHAN (SAMISAKE) DI KOTA BENGKULU (STUDI KASUS : KELURAHAN PADANG JATI KECAMATAN RATU SAMBAN KOTA BENGKULU). Jurnal Governance Dan Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33369/jgoap.v5i1.21282

References

  1. Bryman, Alan dan Robert G. Burgress. 1999. Qualitative Research. Great Britain. SAGE Publications Ltd. Perspective Concepts and Cases. New Jersey. Pearson Education International.
  2. Casley, Kumar dan Krishna Kumar. 1991. Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Proyek Pertanian. Jakarta. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia
  3. Cheema, G. Shabbir. 1981. Institutional Dimensions of Regional Development. Japan. Maruzen Asia
  4. Creswell, John W. 2002. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Jakarta. KIK Press.
  5. David, Fred R. 2001. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases 8th edition. New Jersey. Prentice Hall
  6. Fischer, Frank & Gerald J. Miller dan Mara S. Sidney. 2007. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. United States of America. Taylor and Francis Group.
  7. Huda, Ni’matul. 2007. Pengawasan Pusat terhadap Daerah dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. Yogyakarta. FH UII Press
  8. Husnan, Suad dan Suwarsono Muhammad. 2000. Studi Kelayakan Proyek. Yogyakarta. Unit Penerbit dan Percetakan UPP AMP YKPN
  9. Hutabarat, Jemsly dan Martani Huseini. 2006. Strategik di Tengah Operasional. Jakarta. PT. Elex Media Computindo.
  10. Inayatullah, dan Kuldeep Mathur. 1980. Monitoring and Evaluation of Rural Development: Some Asian Experiences. Malaysia. Asian and Pacific Development Administration Centre.
  11. Kim, B. S., Atkinson, D. R., & Yang, P. H. (1999). The Asian Values Scale : Development, Factor Analysis, Validation, and Reliability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(3), 342-352.
  12. Koentjaraningrat. 1990. Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  13. Kusek, Jody Zall dan Ray C.Rist. 2004. Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System. Washington DC. The World Bank
  14. McGill, Ronald. 1996. Institutional Development: A Third World Management Perspective. London. MacMillan Press LTD.
  15. M.S., Joko Widodo. 2006. Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Malang. Bayu Media Publishing.
  16. Muhammad, Farouk dan H. Djaali. 2005. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: PTIK Press dan Restu Agung.
  17. Nazir, Mohammad. 1983. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta. Ghalia Indonesia.
  18. Neuman, Lawrence R. 2003. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. United States of America. Pearson Education.
  19. Prasojo, Eko, dan Irfan R. Maksum dan Teguh Kurniawan. 2006. Desentralisasi & Pemerintahan Daerah: Antara Model Demokrasi Lokal & Efisiensi Struktural. Depok. Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia.
  20. Peters, B. Guy. 2000. Institutional Theory in Political Science. London and New York. Continuum.
  21. Royse, David et.al. 2006. Program Evaluation: An Introduction 4th ed. United States of America. The Thomson Brooks Corporation.
  22. Tambunan, T.TH.. 2012. Perekonomian Indonesia. Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia: Bogor.
  23. Todaro, Michael, P., dan Smith, Stephen, C 2006. Pembangunan Ekonomi.
  24. Jilid 1. Edisi 8. Penerbit Erlangga: Jakarta.