Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 470 Download : 1200

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Perkembangan masyarakat yang terbilang sangat cepat, harus mampu direspon oleh birokrasi dengan melakukan transformasi ke arah digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap kesiapan perangkat desa dalam mengimplementasikan birokrasi digital di pedesaan dan kendala yang dihadapi saat ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan strategi studi kasus. Penelitian ini menggunakan kasus di Desa Palakka, Kabupaten Barru, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan, untuk menggali kesiapan dan kendala dalam mempersiapkan transformasi birokrasi menuju digital. Dalam studi kasus ini, informan ditentukan dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis melalui proses reduksi data, penyajian data, penarikan kesimpulan dan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa dari segi pelayanan administrasi kependudukan dan pelayanan kesehatan di Desa Palakka desa berada dalam tahap adaptasi untuk bertransformasi ke sistem digital. Pada level struktur, penyesuaian ke arah digital dilakukan dengan mengupayakan sarana fisik dan penyediaan aplikasi digital dan himbauan untuk penerapannya. Sementara pada level aktor telah aktif melakukan proses reproduksi struktur dalam mendukung perubahan sistem pelayanan birokrasi menuju digitalisasi. Adapun beberapa kendala yang dihadapi adalah belum maksimalnya infrastruktur jaringan internet sebagai sumber daya yang penting bagi pelaksanaan transformasi digital, dan masih terbatasnya anggaran dalam penyediaan sarana digital, serta masih rendahnya kompetensi digital aparatur dan masyarakat.


 Kata Kunci : Birokrasi, Kendala, Pedesaan, Transformasi Digital


 

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright noticeof the Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara (JSN) is as follows :

The author who submits the manuscript must understand and agree that the copyrights published are held by Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara. Copyright includes rights to reproduce, distribute and sell every part of journal articles in all forms and media. This is for download the copyright transfer form for signed by the corresponding author. All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal  Sosiologi Nusantara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Then, you are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

How to Cite
Syam, R., Ras, A., & Habibie, A. Y. (2023). KESIAPAN DAN KENDALA TRANSFORMASI BIROKRASI DIGITAL DI PEDESAAN : READINESS AND OBSTACLES OF DIGITAL BUREAUCRACY TRANSFORMATION IN RURAL AREAS. Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsn.9.1.1-18
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Albrow, Martin. 2013. “Sociology: The Basics.” Sociology: The Basics. Doi: 10.4324/9780203449189.
  2. Bullock, Justin B., Jesper Rosenberg Hansen, and David J. Houston. 2018. “Sector
  3. Differences in Employee’s Perceived Importance of Income and Job Security: Can These Be Found Across the Contexts of
  4. Countries, Cultures, and Occupations?” Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1425226 21(2):243–71. Doi:
  5. 1080/10967494.2018.1425226.
  6. Bullock, Justin B., Justin M. Stritch, and Hal G. Rainey. 2015. “International
  7. Comparison of Public and Private Employees’ Work Motives, Attitudes, and Perceived Rewards.” Public Administration Review
  8. (3):479–89. Doi: 10.1111/PUAR.12356.
  9. Datta, Pratim, Laurie Walker, and Fabrizio Amarilli. 2020. “Digital Transformation:
  10. Learning from Italy’s Public Administration*.” Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases 10(2):54–71. Doi:
  11. 1177/2043886920910437/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_20438869209 10437-FIG2.JPEG.
  12. Filgueiras, Fernando, Cireno Flávio, and Pedro Palotti. 2019. “Digital Transformation and Public Service Delivery in Brazil.” Latin
  13. American Policy 10(2):195–219.
  14. Firdaus, Inas Tasya, Melinia Dita Tursina, and Ali Roziqin. 2021. “Transformasi Birokrasi Digital Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Untuk
  15. Mewujudkan Digitalisasi Pemeritahan Indonesia.” Kybernan: Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan 4(2):226–39.
  16. Doi:10.35326/KYBERNAN.V4I2.1244.
  17. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Univ of California Press.
  18. Giest, Sarah N., and Bram Klievink. 2022. “More than a Digital System: How AI Is Changing the Role of Bureaucrats in Different
  19. Organizational Contexts.” Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2095001. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2095001.
  20. Gomm, Roger, Martyn Hammersley, and Peter Foster. 2011. “Case Study Method.” Case Study Method. Doi:
  21. 4135/9780857024367.
  22. Gong, Yiwei, Jun Yang, and Xiaojie Shi. 2020. “Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Digital Transformation in Government:
  23. Analysis of Flexibility and Enterprise Architecture.” Government Information Quarterly 37(3):101487. Doi:
  24. 1016/J.GIQ.2020.101487.
  25. Hafseld, Kristin H. J., Bassam Hussein, and Antoine B. Rauzy. 2021. “An Attempt toUnderstand Complexity in a Government Digital
  26. Transformation Project.” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management 9(3).
  27. Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy. Polity.
  28. Höchtl, Johann, Peter Parycek, and Ralph Schöllhammer. 2016. “Big Data in the Policy Cycle: Policy Decision Making in the Digital
  29. Era.” Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187 26(1–2):147–69. Doi: 10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187.
  30. Hur, Joon Young, Wonhyuk Cho, Geon Lee, and Sarah Hendrica Bickerton. 2019. “The ‘Smart Work’ Myth: How Bureaucratic Inertia
  31. and Workplace Culture Stymied Digital Transformation in the Relocation of South Korea’s Capital.” Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1663786 43(4):691–709. Doi: 10.1080/10357823.2019.1663786.
  32. Kominfo. 2021. “Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika.” Retrieved January 8, 2023 (https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/35496/inilah-capaian-reformasi-birokrasi-semester-pertama-2021/0/berita).
  33. Lenaini, Ika. 2021. “Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Purposive Dan Snowball Sampling.” Historis : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan
  34. Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah 6(1):33–39. Doi: 10.31764/historis.vXiY.4075.
  35. Muhammaditya, Nur, Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto, One Herwantoko, Yulia Gita Fany, and Mahari Is Subangun. 2022. “Institutional
  36. Divergence of Digital Item Bank Management in Bureaucratic Hybridization: An Application of SSM Based Multi-Method.”
  37. Systemic Practice and Action Research 35(4):527–53. Doi: 10.1007/S11213-021-09579-4/TABLES/6.
  38. Newman, Joshua, Michael Mintrom, and Deirdre O’Neill. 2022. “Digital Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, and Bureaucratic
  39. Transformation.” Futures 136:102886. Doi: 10.1016/J.FUTURES.2021.102886.
  40. Orlikowski, Wanda J., and C. Suzanne Iacono. 2001. “Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research—A Call to
  41. Theorizing the IT Artifact.” Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Isre.12.2.121.9700 12(2):121–34. Doi:10.1287/ISRE.12.2.121.9700.
  42. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1996. “Mewirausahakan Birokrasi (Terjemahan).” Abdul Rasyid, Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.
  43. Perry, James L., Ramon Aldag, Gary Brumback, Allen Cassady, Danny Lam, Larry Lane, Ted Miller, Frank Sherwood, Don Schwab, Tom Sinclair, and Alex Weiss. 1996. “Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6(1):5–22. Doi: 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024303.
  44. Ransbotham, Sam, David Kiron, and Pamela Kirk Prentice. 2015. “Minding the Analytics Gap.”
  45. Rijali, Ahmad. 2019. “Analisis Data Kualitatif.” Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 17(33):81–95. Doi:
  46. 18592/ALHADHARAH.V17I33.2374.
  47. Rusdan, Rusdan. 2017. “Upaya Transformasi Birokrasi Pemerintah Sebagai Unit Pelayan Publik.” SOSIALITA 9(2).
  48. Simpson, Jennifer E. 2020. “Twenty-First Century Contact: The Use of Mobile Communication Devices and the Internet by Young People
  49. in Care.” Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0308575920906100 44(1):6–19. Doi: 10.1177/0308575920906100.
  50. Somad, Kemas Arsyad. 2012. “Reformasi Birokrasi Desa Menuju Pemerintahan Desa
  51. Yang Demokratis.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 41(4):487–92. doi: 10.14710/MMH.41.4.2012.487-492.
  52. Tangi, Luca, Marijn Janssen, Michele Benedetti, and Giuliano Noci. 2020. “Barriers and Drivers of Digital Transformation in Public
  53. Organizations: Results from a Survey in the Netherlands.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture
  54. Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 12219 LNCS:42–56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57599-
  55. _4/COVER.
  56. Yin, Robert K. 2011. “Studi Kasus Desain Dan Metode.” Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.