Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 22 Download : 10

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Agrarian conflict in Setrojenar involves various actors; military, farmers, and governments, as they have different interests of land. These varied interests cause significant problems regarding rights and access to utilizing resources among those actors. The military utilizes land for training purposes. On the other hand, farmers cultivate the land for agriculture.  This article scrutinized how farmers’ involvement in agrarian conflicts allows them to experience conditions of uncertainty in their efforts to survive, especially when the level of conflict increases. Farmer households must be able to adapt and implement survival strategies with the livelihood assets/capital (natural physical, capital, human, and financial capital, and social capital) they have. This study aims to analyze the correlation between the level of agrarian conflict and farmer households’ strategy and livelihood assets. This study applied a quantitative method supported by a qualitative method. Quantitative data were obtained using a research questionnaire and processed using Spearman’s rank, while qualitative data were collected by conducting interviews. The results of the study show that the level of agrarian conflict significantly correlates with the livelihood assets and strategies of farmer households. The uncertainty experienced by farming households is regarding the agricultural activities they carry out when the intensity of the conflict increases or when the Indonesian Army (Tentara Angkatan Darat) training activities take place.

Keywords

Agrarian Conflict Livelihood Asset Livelihood Strategy

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Copyright noticeof the Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara (JSN) is as follows :

The author who submits the manuscript must understand and agree that the copyrights published are held by Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara. Copyright includes rights to reproduce, distribute and sell every part of journal articles in all forms and media. This is for download the copyright transfer form for signed by the corresponding author. All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal  Sosiologi Nusantara is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Then, you are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

How to Cite
Indri Marizka, & Heru Purwandari. (2025). Farmers’ Livelihood System in Agrarian Conflict Areas (Case Study: Setrojenar Village, Buluspesantren Subdistrict, Kebumen Regency). Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara, 11(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsn.11.1.1-23
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amalia, Dharmawan, & Putri. 2015. “Perubahan Lanskap Ekologi Dan Resiliensi Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Di Sekitar Hutan Di Kalimantan Timur.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 03(03):121–27. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v3i3.10643. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/10643.
  2. Andari. 2014. “Konflik Sosial Sebagai Implikasi Kerenggangan Sosial Dalam Masyarakat.” Jurnal PKS 13(1):29–39. doi: Retrieved December 22, 2024 (https://ejournal.kemsos.go.id/index.php/jpks/article/view/1274).
  3. Annisa, Satria, & A Kinseng. 2009. “Konflik Nelayan Di Jawa Timur : Studi Kasus Perubahan Struktur Agraria Dan Diferensiasi Kesejahteraan Komunitas Pekebun Di Lebak, Banten.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v3i1.5870. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/5870.
  4. Astuti, Dharmawan, Intan, et al. 2008. “Struktur Nafkah Rumahtangga Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kondisi Ekosistem Sub DAS Citanduy Hulu.” Sodality 2(1). doi: 10.22500/sodality.v2i1.5895. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/5895.
  5. Azzahra, & Dharmawan. 2015. “Pengaruh Livelihood Assets Terhadap Resiliensi Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Pada Saat Banjir Di Desa Sukabakti Kecamatan Tambelang Kabupaten Bekasi.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 3(1):1–9. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v3i1.9427. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/9427.
  6. Bakker. 2023. “Custom and Violence in Indonesia’s Protracted Land Conflict.” Social Sciences and Humanities Open. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100624. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291123002292.
  7. Brigita, & Sihaloho. 2018. “Strategi, Kerentanan, Dan Resiliensi Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Di Daerah Rawan Bencana Banjir.” Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat [JSKPM] 2(2):239–54. doi: 10.29244/jskpm.2.2.239-254. https://ejournal-skpm.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jskpm/article/view/251.
  8. Dahrendorf. 1986. Konflik Dan Konflik Kelas Dalam Masyarakat Industri. Jakarta: Rajawali.
  9. Dharmawan. 2007. “Sistem Penghidupan Dan Nafkah Pedesaan: Pandangan Sosiologi Nafkah (Livelihood Sociology) Mazhab Barat Dan Mazhab Bogor.” Sodality: Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, Dan Ekologi Manusia 01(02):169–92. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v1i2.5932. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/5932.
  10. Effendi, & Tukiran. 2012. Metode Penelitian Survei. Edisi Rev. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  11. Ellis. 2000. “The Determinants of Rural Livelihood Diversification in Developing Countries.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(2):289–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x.
  12. Fisher. 2001. Mengelola Konflik: Keterampilan Dan Strategi Untuk Bertindak. edited by S. N. Kartikasari. Jakarta: Zed Books.
  13. Fridayanti, & Dharmawan. 2013. “Analisis Struktur Dan Strategi Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Sekitar Kawasan Hutan Konservasi Di Desa Cipeuteuy, Kabupaten Sukabumi.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 1(1):26–36. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v1i1.9388.https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/9388.
  14. Kementerian Keuangan RI. 2023. “APBN Kita Edisi 2023.” Media.Kemenkue.Go.Id.
  15. KPA. 2019. Masa Depan Reforma Agraria Melampaui Tahun Politik. Jakarta.
  16. KPA. 2020. Dari Aceh Sampai Papua: Urgensi Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Struktural Dan Jalan Pembaruan Agraria Ke Depan. Jakarta.
  17. Kurniati, & Fakhriah. 2017. “Bpn Sebagai Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Di Indonesia Pasca Perkaban No. 11 Tahun 2016.” Sosiohumaniora 19(2):95–105. doi: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v19i2.11999. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/sosiohumaniora/article/view/11999.
  18. Lestari, & Dharmawan. 2011. “Dampak Sosio-Ekonomis Dan Sosio-Ekologis Konversi Lahan.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 05(01):1–12. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v5i1.5835.https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/5835.
  19. Lestari, & Purwandari. 2014. “Perubahan Struktur Agraria Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Gerakan Petani Pedesaan (Analisis Karakter Forum Paguyuban Petani Jasinga Pasca PPAN).” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 2(1):43–52. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v2i1.9411.https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/9411.
  20. Martini, Ash-Shafikh, & Afif. 2019. “Implementasi Reforma Agraria Terhadap Pemenuhan Harapan Masyarakat Yang Bersengketa Lahan.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 5(2):150–62. doi: 10.31292/jb.v5i2.367. https://jurnalbhumi.stpn.ac.id/index.php/JB/article/view/367.
  21. Mulyani. 2018. “Kritik Atas Penanganan Konflik Agraria Di Indonesia.” Bhumi : Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 1(39):314–55. doi: 10.31292/jb.v1i39.176. https://jurnalbhumi.stpn.ac.id/index.php/JB/article/view/176.
  22. Rahmah, & Soetarto. 2014. “The Paguyuban Petani’s Movement Versus The State and The Impact to Sukamulya Community’s Welfare.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v2i1.9408 . https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/9408.
  23. Sarwono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Suluh Indonesia.
  24. Scoones. 1998. “Sustainable Rural Livelihoods a Framework for Analysis.” Development (Basingstoke) 42(2):57–63. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.development.1110037.
  25. Scott. 2000. Senjatanya Orang-Orang Yang Kalah. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  26. Shabia. 2021. Konflik Agraria Dan Hak Atas Pangan. doi: Retrieved December 22, 2024 (http://fian-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Infobrief_Konflik-Agraria-dan-Hak-Atas-Pangan.pdf).
  27. Shohibuddin. 2018. Perspektif Agraria Kritis: Teori, Kebijakan, Dan Kajian Empiris. Pertama. edited by T. S. Press. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
  28. Sihaloho, Wahyuni, & Kinseng. 2016. “Perubahan Struktur Agraria, Kemiskinan, Dan Gerak Penduduk: Sebuah Tinjauan Historis.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 4(1):48–60. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v4i1.14406. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/14406.
  29. Soni, Fedryansyah, Nuriyah Hidayat, et al. 2020. “Contemporary Social Problem: Agrarian Conflict.” Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8(3):1189–95. doi: 10.18510/hssr.2020.83121.https://mgesjournals.com/hssr/article/view/hssr.2020.83121.
  30. Suharto, & Basar. 2019. “Konflik Agraria Dalam Pengelolaan Tanah Perkebunan Pada Pt Hevea Indonesia (Pt Hevindo) Dengan Masyarakat Kecamatan Nanggung Kabupaten Bogor.” Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik 1(1):55. doi: 10.24198/jkrk.v1i1.20893. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jkrk/article/view/20893
  31. Syah, & Murdianto. 2021. “Hubungan Tingkat Konflik Agraria Dengan Tingkat Efektivitas Program Model Kampung Konservasi.” Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat [JSKPM] 5(3):345–59. doi: 10.29244/jskpm.v5i3.828. https://ejournal-skpm.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jskpm/article/view/828.
  32. Tauchid. 2020. Masalah Agraria Sebagai Masalah Penghidupan Dan Kemakmuran Rakyat Indonesia. Revisi. edited by Tim Libra. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
  33. Widiyanto, Dharmawan, & Prasodjo. 2010. “Strategi Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Tembakau Di Lereng Gunung Sumbing: Studi Kasus Di Desa Wonotirto Dan Desa Campursari, Kecamatan Bulu, Kabupaten Temanggung.” Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, Dan Ekologi Manusia 4(1):91–114. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v4i1.5851.https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/5851.
  34. Zakie. 2017. “Konflik Agraria Yang Tak Pernah Reda.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY 24(1):40. doi: 10.22219/jihl.v24i1.4256. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/4256.