Main Article Content

Abstract

In Pontianak City, the increasing reliance on private vehicles has significantly contributed to traffic congestion, environmental pollution, and challenges in urban mobility, raising critical concerns about the declining use of public transportation options such as the oplets. This study investigates the underlying reasons for the preference for private vehicles among the residents of Pontianak and examines the resulting impacts of the shift from public to private transportation. Grounded in Max Weber's Social Action Theory, the research employs a qualitative method involving 14 purposively selected informants, with data analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s Interactive Model. The findings reveal that residents favor private vehicles due to a combination of internal factors—such as flexibility, comfort, time efficiency, convenience, economic considerations, safety, and travel purposes—and external factors, including inadequate public transportation infrastructure and weather conditions. These factors reflect how individual motives, rational choices, and situational influences shape transportation behavior. The shift has led to various impacts, including traffic congestion, air and noise pollution, higher accident risks, reduced social interaction, social stratification, and increasing individualism. The study concludes that enhancing the quality, accessibility, and attractiveness of public transportation is essential to reduce overdependence on private vehicles and promote more sustainable urban mobility in Pontianak.

Keywords

Max Weber Oplets Private Vehicles Public Transportation Social Action Transportation Preferences

Article Details

How to Cite
Dara Septika Natalia Anggraeni, Arkanudin, Sudirman, Herlan, & Indah Listyaningrum. (2025). Private Vehicle Dependency In Pontianak City Through The Social Action Perspective. Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara, 11(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsn.11.1.84-100

References

  1. Affandi, L., and D. Parikesit. 2022. ‘Faktor-Faktor Psikologis yang Menjadi Pertimbangan Utama Penggunaan Mobil Pribadi Dan Sepeda Motor Di Jakarta’. Jurnal Profesi Insinyur Universitas Lampung 3(1):6–9. doi:10.23960/jpi.v3n1.73.
  2. Ali, Akbar et al. 2021. ‘Traffic Efficiency Models for Urban Traffic Management Using Mobile Crowd Sensing: A Survey’. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su132313068.
  3. Büscher, Monika et al. 2011. Mobile Methods. Routledge: London.
  4. Cervero, Robert. 2000. Informal Transport in the Developing World. Nairobi: United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat).
  5. Han, Yan et al. 2018. ‘Research on Passenger’s Travel Mode Choice Behavior Waiting at Bus Station Based on SEM-Logit Integration Model’. Sustainability 10(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061996.
  6. Helmmie, Elshaan, and Tri Basuki Joewono. 2022. ‘Elasticity of Travel Time and Travel Cost of Private Vehicles and Public Transportation in Bandung, Indonesia’. Civil Engineering Dimension 24(2):101–8. doi:10.9744/ced.24.2.101-108.
  7. Itsnaini, Faqihah Muharroroh, and Hilda B. Alexander. 2024.‘Transportasi Umum di Sejumlah Kota Gratis, Bisakah Diterapkan di Seluruh Indonesia?’ https://lestari.kompas.com/read/2024/01/12/090236386/transportasi-umum-di-sejumlah-kota-gratis-bisakah-diterapkan-di-seluruh?page=all.
  8. Korlantas Polri. 2023. ‘Data Jumlah Kendaraan Roda Dua Dan Roda Empat 2022’. https://satudata.pontianak.go.id/dataset/data-jumlah-kendaraan-roda-dua-dan-roda-empat [24-07-2023]
  9. Miles, Matthew B. et al. 2019. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Fourth Edition. 4th ed. Arizona State University, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  10. Morgan, Rosemary et al. 2016. ‘Performance of Private Sector Health Care: Implications for Universal Health Coverage’. The Lancet 388(10044):606–12. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00343-3.
  11. Muhlis, Alis, and Norkholis Norkholis. 2016. ‘Analisis Tindakan Sosial Max Weber dalam Tradisi Pembacaan Kitab Mukhtashar Al-Bukhari (Studi Living Hadis)’. Jurnal Living Hadis. doi:10.14421/livinghadis.2016.1121.
  12. Napitupulu, Budiman et al. 2018. ‘Analysis of Air Pollution Caused by Mass Transportation Design Changes’. Matec Web of Conferences 195:4021. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201819504021.
  13. Othman, Abdul Ghapar, and Kausar Hj Ali. 2020. ‘Transportation and Quality of Life’. Planning Malaysia. doi:10.21837/pm.v18i13.774.
  14. Purwoko, Budi Aji et al. 2022. ‘Willingness To Modal Shift From Private To Public Transportation in Jakarta Metropolitan Area’. Planning Malaysia 20(2):22–34. doi:10.21837/pm.v20i21.1089.
  15. Ramelia, Pratiwi, and Jawoto Sih Setyono. 2015. ‘Ketergantungan Terhadap Kendaraan Pribadi Di Kota Pontianak Kalimantan’. Jurnal Teknik PWK 4(1):107–18.
  16. Rocha, Hudyeron et al. 2023. ‘Exploring Modal Choices for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Insights From the Porto Metropolitan Area in Portugal’. Sustainability 15(20):14765. doi:10.3390/su152014765.
  17. Sari, Kartika et al. 2017. ‘Reduction of CO2 Emission From Transportation Activities in the Area of Pasar Besar in Malang City’. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 70:12018. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012018.
  18. Siahtiri, Vida et al. 2022. ‘Unlocking Consumer Consideration Set Size Formation for Luxury Services: A Study of Self‐identification, Brand Status and Anticipated Emotions’. International Journal of Consumer Studies 46(6):2488–2502. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12801.
  19. Spears, Steven et al. 2016. ‘Driving Reduction After the Introduction of Light Rail Transit: Evidence From an Experimental-Control Group Evaluation of the Los Angeles Expo Line’. Urban Studies 54(12):2780–99. doi:10.1177/0042098016657261.
  20. Stavrinos, Despina et al. 2013. ‘Impact of Distracted Driving on Safety and Traffic Flow’. Accident Analysis & Prevention. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.003.
  21. Stojanovski, Todor. 2019. ‘Urban Form and Mobility Choices: Informing About Sustainable Travel Alternatives, Carbon Emissions and Energy Use From Transportation in Swedish Neighbourhoods’. Sustainability 11(2):548. doi:10.3390/su11020548.
  22. Wang, Kailai, and Gulsah Akar. 2019. ‘Factors Affecting the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles for Commute Trips: An Analysis With the 2015 and 2017 Puget Sound Travel Surveys’. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2673(2):13–25. doi:10.1177/0361198118822293.
  23. Weber, Max. 2019. Economy and Society: A New Translation. Harvard University Press.
  24. Wulandari, Meity et al. 2018. ‘Identifikasi Faktor Pendukung Dan Penghambat Pengguna Angkutan Umum’. JeLAST : Jurnal Teknik Kelautan , PWK , Sipil, Dan Tambang 5(2):1–15.
  25. Youssef, Zaher et al. 2021. ‘Modeling the Modal Shift Towards a More Sustainable Transport by Stated Preference in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia’. Sustainability 13(1):337. doi:10.3390/su13010337.