Main Article Content

Abstract

Religion serves not only as a spiritual guide but also as a powerful mechanism of social control, shaping behavior and fostering social cohesion through internalized values and norms. In highly pluralistic societies such as Indonesia, understanding how diverse religious traditions shape social regulation is critical. However, comparative interfaith analyses remain scarce. This qualitative descriptive study investigates the role of religion as a tool of social control from an interfaith perspective in Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Ten religious leaders representing Islam, Catholicism, Protestantism, Hinduism, and Buddhism were selected through snowball sampling. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña's interactive model, within the framework of Kelman's Social Influence Theory. The findings indicate that all five religions promote core values—discipline, compassion, justice, and respect—that function as mechanisms of social regulation. Three key themes emerged: (1) moral discipline and self-regulation, (2) love and social harmony, and (3) ethical control and communal cohesion. These values are internalized through stages of compliance, identification, and internalization. While methods differ—from karmic beliefs in Hinduism to communal rituals in Islam—all traditions foster moral accountability and contribute to societal stability. Religion operates both vertically (between adherents and the divine) and horizontally (among community members), embedding both formal and informal social sanctions. Despite theological differences, shared moral imperatives strengthen interfaith understanding and reinforce social order. This study affirms the enduring relevance of religion in shaping ethical behavior in multicultural societies and calls for further exploration of its evolving role amid changing socio-political landscapes.

Keywords

Interfaith Religion Social Control Religious Norms Social Cohesion Moral Values

Article Details

How to Cite
Apriansyah, Y., & Rany Claudia. (2025). Religion and Social Order: An Interfaith Exploration of Values, Norms, and Control Mechanisms in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara, 11(2), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsn.11.2.188-201

References

  1. Arianto, B., and S. M. Rani. 2024. Teknik Wawancara Dalam Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Balikpapan: Borneo Novelty Publishing.
  2. Berger, P. L. 1990. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Anchor Books.
  3. Black, D. 2020. Social Control: An Overview. Oxford University Press.
  4. Cullen, F. T., and R. Agnew. 2022. Criminological Theory: Past to Present (7th Ed. Oxford University Press.
  5. Davie, G. 2023. Religion in Modern Europe: A Sociological Perspective (3rd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Derung, Teresia Noiman, Maria Mandonza, Gathan Aryasena Suyatno, and Alexius Mete. 2022. “Fungsi Agama Terhadap Perilaku Sosial Masyarakat.” In Theos : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Theologi 2(11):373–80. doi: 10.56393/intheos.v2i11.1279.
  7. Durkheim, Emile. n.d. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press.
  8. Elia, Ardyan, and Dkk. 2023. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitaif. Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
  9. Esposito, J. L., and N. J. DeLong-Bas. 2001. Women in Muslim Family Law. Syracuse University Press.
  10. Gibbs, J. P. 2021. Deviance and Social Control. Routledge.
  11. Hefner, R. W. 2018. Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
  12. Hwang, Y. 2014. “Understanding Social Influence Theory and Personal Goals in E-Learning.” Information Development 32(2):466–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914556688.
  13. Malhotra, Y., and D. F. Galletta. 2021. “A Multidimensional Commitment Model of Volitional Systems Adoption and Usage Behavior.” Journal of Management Information Systems 22(1):117–15. doi: doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045840.
  14. Miles, M. .., A. .. Huberman, and And Saldana. 2014. . . Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook,. 3rd ed. USA: Sage Publications.
  15. Mukhlisin, Dkk. 2012. Pendidikan Agama Berbasis Nilai. Pekalongan: STAI Pekalongan Press.
  16. Rani, P., and R. Prakash. 2020. “Religion and Prosocial Behavior in Hindu Communities.” Asian Journal of Social Science 48(3):2014–2230. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28179462.
  17. Ritzer, G., and D. J. Goodman. 2011. Teori Sosiologi Modern (Edisi Ke-7). Jakarta: Kencana.
  18. Silver, Laura, Jonathan Evans, Maria Smerkovich, Sneha Gubbala, Manolo Corichi, and William Miner. 2025. Comparing Levels of Religious Nationalism Around the World. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.
  19. Smith, C., and M. L. Denton. 2005. Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers. Oxford University Press.
  20. Smith, J. Z. 2021. Religion: What It Is and Why It Matters. Harvard University Press.
  21. Stark, R., and R. Finke. 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. University of California Press.
  22. Wibisono, A., and M. Lee. 2022. “Religious Pluralism and Social Cohesion in Indonesia.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 53(2):245–265. doi: doi.org/10.1017/S0022463422000123.
  23. Yuliani, N. D. 2024. “Interfaith Relations and Social Order in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences 15(1):45–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267032