Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

 

Jurnal Enggano contains a mixture of academic articles and reviews on various aspects of marine science and fisheries with the following topics:

- Marine and Fisheries Biology

- Marine Ecology

- Marine Conservation

- Mariculture

- Wild Fisheries

- Marine Biotechnology

- Marine Technology

- Coastal Resources Management

- Marine Tourism

- Coastal Socio-economic

- Marine and Fisheries Processing Technology

- Marine Geology, Physical and Chemical Oceanography

- Marine Processes and Dynamics

 

 

Section Policies

VOL 1, NO 1 (2016): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 1, NO 2 (2016): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 2, NO 1 (2017): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 2, NO 2 (2017): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 3, NO 1 (2018): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 3, NO 2 (2018): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 4, NO 1 (2019): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 4, NO 2 (2019): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 5, NO 1 (2020): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 5, NO 2 (2020): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue SEMINAR NASIONAL VIRTUAL

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 6, NO 1 (2021): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 6, NO 2 (2021): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Jurnal ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 7, NO 1 (2022): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

VOL 7, NO 2 (2022): JURNAL ENGGANO

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

 

Blind reviewing will be applied and at least two reviewers will be assigned for each submitted paper. Author(s) are allowed to propose appropriate reviewers by providing their names and email addresses, but the decision remains in the hand of the editor. Authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to check similarity of the manuscript. This similarity checking and screening is conducted using Turnitin. The decision will be made based on the level of similarities with other articles. The editor will decide on either immediately rejects the manuscripts, contact authors for further clarifications, or to proceed to the peer-review process. The final decision is made by editor and editorial board.

 

 

Open Access Policy

 

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.  We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

 

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Ethics Statement

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

Based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors

 

Jurnal Enggano is a peer-reviewed international journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Badan Penerbitan Fakultas Pertanian/BPFP University of Bengkulu). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Enggano is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

University of Bengkulu as publisher of Jurnal Enggano takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Department of Marine Sciences of University of Bengkulu and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of Jurnal Enggano is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. 

Duties of Editor

  • The editor of Jurnal Enggano is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
  • An editor will at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  • The editor of Jurnal Enggano and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  • Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

 

Duties of Reviewers

  • Reviewers assists editor of Jurnal Enggano in making decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  • Reviewers who feels unqualified to review submitted manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
  • All manuscripts received must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Duties of Authors

  • Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work.
  • The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  • An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  • Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  • Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  • All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  • When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Indexing and Abstracting

 

Jurnal Enggano has been indexed by:

 

 

Article Processing Charge

 

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)

Article Publication Process with cost in the form of IDR payment: 500000.00 (IDR)
If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs. 

If you do not have funds to pay such fees, you will have an opportunity to waive each fee. We do not want fees to prevent the publication of worthy work.

 

 

Guide to the Review Process

 

The next author is required to respond to the review results from reviewers who have been sent and decided by the Editor. Editor's decisions are usually the result of Reviewer recommendations. In OJS, the decisions to be received by the Author are as follows:

1. Accept Submission, meaning that the Reviewer recommends that the script be accepted without any improvement.

2. Revision Required, meaning that reviewers recommend that the script needs minor repairs without having to review

3. Resubmit for Review, meaning that reviewers recommend scripts need to be reviewed again by reviewers. This is because too many revisions are needed

4. Decline Submission, meaning that the reviewer recommends the script be rejected. Usually related to the quality of the text.

To respond to the results of a review from the Reviewer / Editor, the author enters the journal website using an account that was previously created. The methods are as follows:

1. The author logs into the Journal System

2. After logging in, click on the active writing as shown below

3.  Then see Status, and click on the status statement.

 

 

Plagiarism and Retraction Policy

 

Jurnal Enggano Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in Jurnal Enggano. Jurnal Enggano will use Turnitin's originality checking software and Plagiarism Checker as our tool in detecting similarities of texts in articles. Jurnal Enggano only tolerates a maximum 20 percent of similarity.

Definition:

Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

Policy:

Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

When plagiarism is identified, the Editor in Chief responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:

Level of Plagiarism

Minor:

A short section of another article is plagiarized without any significant data or idea taken from the other paper

Action: A warning is given to the authors and a request to change the text and properly cite the original article is made

Intermediate: A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized without proper citation to the original paper

Action: The submitted article is rejected and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for one year

Severe: A significant portion of a paper is plagiarized that involves reproducing original results or ideas presented in another publication

Action: The paper is rejected and the authors are forbidden to submit further articles for 3 years.

It is understood that all authors are responsible for the content of their submitted paper as they all read and understand Jurnal Enggano Copyright and Licensing Terms. If a penalty is imposed for plagiarism, all authors will be subject to the same penalty.

If the second case of plagiarism by the same author(s) is identified, a decision on the measures to be enforced will be made by the Editorial board (Editor-in-Chief, and Editorial members) with the Chair of the Editor in Chief. The author(s) might be forbidden to submit further articles forever.

This policy applies also to material reproduced from another publication by the same author(s). If an author uses text or figures that have previously been published, the corresponding paragraphs or figures should be identified and the previous publication referenced. It is understood that in the case of a review paper or a paper of a tutorial nature much of the material was previously published.

The author should identify the source of the previously published material and obtain permission from the original author and the publisher. If an author submits a manuscript to Jurnal Enggano with significant overlap with a manuscript submitted to another journal simultaneously, and this overlap is discovered during the review process or after the publications of both papers, the editor of the other journal is notified and the case is treated as a severe plagiarism case. Significant overlap means the use of identical or almost identical figures and identical or slightly modified text for one-half or more of the paper. For self-plagiarism of less than one-half of the paper but more than one-tenth of the paper, the case shall be treated as intermediate plagiarism. If self-plagiarism is confined to the methods section, the case shall be considered as minor plagiarism.

If an author uses some of his previously published material to clarify the presentation of new results, the previously published material shall be identified and the difference to the present publication shall be mentioned. Permission to republish must be obtained from the copyright holder. In the case of a manuscript that was originally published in conference proceedings and then is submitted for publication in Jurnal Enggano either in identical or in expanded form, the authors must identify the name of the conference proceedings and the date of the publication and obtain permission to republish from the copyright holder. The editor may decide not to accept this paper for publication.

However, an author shall be permitted to use material from an unpublished presentation, including visual displays, in a subsequent journal publication. In the case of a publication being submitted, that was originally published in another language, the title, date, and journal of the original publication must be identified by the authors, and the copyright must be obtained. The editor may accept such a translated publication to bring it to the attention of a wider audience. The editor may select a specific paper that had been published (e.g. a “historic” paper) for republication in order to provide a better perspective of a series of papers published in one issue of Jurnal Enggano. This republication shall be clearly identified as such and the date and journal of the original publication shall be given, and the permission of the author(s) and the publisher shall be obtained.

The Jurnal Enggano layout editor for the Journal is responsible for maintaining the list of authors subjected to penalties and will check that no authors of a submitted paper are on this list. If a banned author is identified, the layout editor will inform the Editor-in-Chief who will take appropriate measures. This policy will be posted on the website with the instructions for submitting a manuscript, and a copy will be sent to the authors with the confirmation email upon initial receipt of their original manuscript.

Retraction and/or Corrections

Authors are discouraged from withdrawing submitted manuscripts after it is in the publication process (review, copyedit, layout, etc.,). During the time, Jurnal Enggano had spent valuable resources besides time spent in the process. Should under any circumstances that the author(s) still request for a withdrawal, author(s) should pay back every effort put into the manuscript processes at an amount of US $100. Paid upon official request from the author(s) in an email sent to Jurnal Enggano editor using the same email address used in correspondence.

Jurnal Enggano editors shall consider retracting a publication if:

They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
it constitutes plagiarism
it reports unethical research


Jurnal Enggano editors shall consider issuing an expression of concern if:

They receive inconclusive evidence of research or publication misconduct by the authors
there is evidence that the findings are unreliable but the authors’ institution will not investigate the case
they believe that an investigation into alleged misconduct related to the publication either has not been or would not be, fair and impartial or conclusive
an investigation is underway but a judgement will not be available for a considerable time
Jurnal Enggano editors shall consider issuing a correction if:

a small portion of an otherwise reliable publication proves to be misleading (especially because of honest error) the author/contributor list is incorrect (i.e. a deserving author has been omitted or somebody who does not meet authorship criteria has been included)
The mechanism follows the guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf. For your convenience, the same document is shown below.

 

 

F.A.Q.

 

Q: How do I send articles to the Jurnal Enggano?
A: To be able to send articles, you must first register. After registering you must log in and click New Submission, then follow the 5 steps. For more complete guidance please open the page: https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jurnalenggano/about/submissions#authorGuidelines 

Q: I registered, but when I logged in I didn't find the New Submission menu

A: chances are you when the register forgot to check the author menu. To be able to activate it please contact our admin jurnalenggano@unib.ac.id and or SMS / WA / TLP 08992347020

 

Q: How do I know the status of the article I sent?

A: To find out the status of the article you sent, please log in and see the status of the article. You can read the following guidelines further
https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jurnalenggano/about/editorialPolicies#custom-3

 

Q: What should I do if I accept the article decision "Revision Required"?
A: Please refer to the following guide: https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jurnalenggano/about/editorialPolicies#custom-3

 

Q: How do I upload the results of the article repairs that I sent?
A: Please refer to the following guide: https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jurnalenggano/about/editorialPolicies#custom-3

 

Q: How do I know if I forget my password and username?
J: To be able to activate it please contact our admin jurnalenggano@unib.ac.id and or SMS / WA / TLP 08992347020. Preferably, so you don't forget your username and password are always saved.

 

Q: How long do I review the article I sent?
A: Regarding the results of the review, at least 4-12 weeks can be seen as the results. To find out the status of the article you sent, please login and see the status of the article. You can read the following guidelines further https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jurnalenggano/about/editorialPolicies#custom-3

Other questions please contact our admin via jurnalenggano@unib.ac.id and or SMS / WA / TLP +6281371808050