Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to investigate students' speaking performances in short film projects and their perspectives on these projects. The research involved seventy-seven second-semester students from three classes in the Multimedia Graphic Engineering Technology program at Politeknik Negeri Medan. This research employed a descriptive qualitative research design, collecting data through observation, questionnaires, and interviews. The study evaluates students' speaking abilities, considering indicators such as range, accuracy, fluency, interaction, and coherence. Additionally, it explores students' perspective regarding the use of short film projects as a final assessment in their English subject. The research findings indicate that the majority of students typically reach a C1 level across various speaking descriptors, demonstrating a strong command of the language with room for improvement in specific areas. From the students' perspectives, it becomes evident that short film projects offer several advantages, including the stimulation of critical and creative thinking, the promotion of teamwork, the development of technical multimedia skills, and enhanced confidence in English communication. Nevertheless, the study acknowledges the existence of challenges, such as time constraints and the need for access to equipment and resources. Nonetheless, the integration of short film projects into graphic engineering multimedia classes emerges as a promising approach to enhance English language learning while enriching students' skills and experiences.

Keywords

Speaking Performances Short Film Projects Students' perspectives

Article Details

References

  1. Bachman and Alderson. 2004. Assesing Speaking. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bogdan and Biklen. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education. USA: Allyn and Bacon.
  3. Brown, H. D. 1994. Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
  4. Brown, H D. 2003. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. NewYork: Pearson Education Inc.
  5. Burns, A., and Joyce, H. 1997. Focus on Speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
  6. Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Available at www.coe.int/lang-cefr.
  7. Hornby, A. S. 2006. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. United Kingdom: Oxford Unversity Press.
  8. Hughes, R. 2011. Teaching and Researching Speaking, 2nd Edition. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
  9. Latha,M. and Ramesh,P. 2012. Teaching English as a Second language: Factors Affecting Speaking Skills. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 1(7).
  10. Lawler, J. & Selinker, L. 1971. On the nature of paradoxes, rules and research in second language learning. Language Learning, 21(1): 27-43.
  11. Luoma, S. 2004. Assessing Speaking. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Lutfiansyah. 2017. Teaching Speaking to Senior High School Through Movie Discussion. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2): 168-173.
  13. McKay, S. L. 2006. Researching Second Language Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A., and Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. USA: Sage.
  15. Nation, I. S. P. 2013. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Riswanto, Serasi, R., Salandega, A. and Kasmaini. 2022. The Effect of Fiction Short Movie on Students’ English Speaking Ability. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(2): 621-628.