Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 10, 2023
Accepted
July 25, 2023
Published
July 25, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 433 Download : 288

Main Article Content

Abstract

Language is the main aspect of education. Improving English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ speaking skills is a crucial communication requirement. In speaking skills, aspects of speech such as pronunciation, intonation, tone, stress, and fluency are highly emphasized. Furthermore, mental processes such as understanding, reasoning, adapting, turn-taking, and responding also play an essential role in speech. Turn-taking is a hugely important thing in conversation, especially in discussion. To take a turn in conversation is a big deal. Personality should consider factors in learning a second language. Extroverts and introverts have different learning styles, which will affect their speaking English learning. This research aimed to seek the used turn-taking pattern and strategies between student extroverts and introverts. This research was conducted using a qualitative-descriptive approach design to the comprehensive summarization of specific events experienced by individuals or small peer groups. The subjects of this research were students in the English Education Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya for the 2021 final examination. As a result, Extroverted students are more comfortable and eager to take the lead in initiating conversations and introverts are more comfortable in the role of responders. While introverts and extroverts utilize similar strategies for turn-taking, their implementation differs; introverts may employ structured pauses and thoughtful contributions, whereas extroverts often engage in dynamic and spontaneous exchanges to ensure active conversation participation.

Keywords

Turn-taking Extroverted Introverted Speaking

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Eva Nur Soedarsono, Linda Mayasari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Chew Fong Peng. (2016). Masalah Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dalam Kalangan Murid Cina Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(2), 10–22.
  2. Eysenck, M. W. (2004). Applied Cognitive Psychology: Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10252
  3. Jacob, L. M. (2001). Pragmatic: An Introduction. Second Edition. Oxford. Blackwell Publishing..
  4. Jiang, B., Ekstedt, E., & Skantze, G. (2023). What makes a good pause? Investigating the turn-holding effects of fillers. http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02101
  5. Joergensen, G. H., Makarla, P. R., Fammartino, M., Benson, L., & Rothermich, K. (2022). No, No One Had Fun. Individual Differences in Nonliteral Language Perception. Language and Speech, 65(2), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211010859
  6. Muhabat, F., & Shahbaz, M. (2014). The Unloved Variable of Extraversion and Academic Achievement in SLA. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 4(1), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v4i1.5210
  7. Orellana, M. F., Martínez, D. C., Lee, C. H., & Montaño, E. (2012). Language as a tool in diverse forms of learning. Linguistics and Education, 23(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.09.001
  8. Rajabi, P., & Salami, S. N. (2016). Gap-Fillers Instruction and Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Speaking Performance. International Journal of Educational Investigations Available Online @ Www.Ijeionline.Com, 2016(1), 78–85. www.ijeionline.com
  9. Sinclair, J.M and Coulthard, R.M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. In M. Coulthard (Eds.), Advance in Spoken Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-34). London: Routledge
  10. Taylor, M. (2020). Personality Styles: Why They Matter in the Workplace. Economic Alternatives, 1, 148–163. https://doi.org/10.37075/ea.2020.1.08
  11. Tyas, N. K., & Pratama, F. G. (2022). Conversation Analysis: Turn-Taking Analysis on Boy William Podcast Episode 06 in Collaboration with Cinta Laura. Allure Journal, 2(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v2i2.11997
  12. Worsley, A. F. (1975). Improving Classroom Discussions: Ten Principles. Improving College and University Teaching, 23(1), 27–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1975.9931106
  13. Zainaba Omar, NorLiza Jamaludin, & Mahzan Arshad. (2021). Kesan Pengajaran Berasaskan Tugasan Terhadap Kemahiran Bertutur. 46(1), 49–58.