Main Article Content

Abstract

Effective learning is an important aspect for students as a provision for the introduction of field schooling (PLP) for students. The purpose of this study was to determine how much students can apply effective learning models in the learning process when following PLP, as well as how the application of these models affect the effectiveness of learning when following PLP. The design of research conducted in this study is qualitative research with descriptive approach. The population in this study as many as 55 students and then sampled a number of 30 students with random sampling. The results of the observation sheet showed that most students (70%) can apply effective learning models in the learning process when following PLP. While the other 30% still have difficulty in implementing the model. The results of data reduction from interview sheets showed that most students (80%) stated that the application of effective learning models in PLP makes learning more fun and effective. Another 20% stated that they had difficulties in implementing the model. The results of data reduction from the questionnaire showed that most students choose expository learning (20%) Problem-Based (60%) and cooperative learning (15%), most students can apply problem-based learning models in the learning process when attending PLP. This can be seen from the reduction of observation sheet data which shows that 70% of students can apply the model. The results of interviews and questionnaires also showed that most students stated that the application of effective learning models in PLP makes learning more fun and effective.

Keywords

Contribution Learning Model PLP

Article Details

How to Cite
I Bagus Endrawan, Hilmy Aliriad, & Martinus. (2023). Contribution of the Learning Model as a Provision for the Introduction of the School Field (PLP) to Optimize the Learning Process. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 7(2), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i2.24714

References

  1. Ali, S. S. (2019). Problem based learning: A student-centered approach. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 73–78.
  2. Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar evaluasi program pendidikan. Cv. Pusdikra Mitra Jaya.
  3. Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian. Rineka Cipta.
  4. Boss, S., & Larmer, J. (2018). Project based teaching: How to create rigorous and engaging learning experiences. ASCD.
  5. Esminarto, E., Sukowati, S., Suryowati, N., & Anam, K. (2016). Implementasi model STAD dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 1(1), 16–23.
  6. Fakhriyah, F. (2014). Penerapan problem based learning dalam upaya mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1).
  7. Fitriani, R., & Adawiyah, R. (2018). Perkembangan fisik motorik anak usia dini. Jurnal Golden Age, 2(01), 25–34.
  8. Indriani, F., & ME, D. (2020). Pengaruh pengenalan lapangan persekolahan (PLP) dan minat menjadi guru terhadap kesiapan menjadi guru pada mahasiswa FKIP pendidikan ekonomi angkatan 2016 Universitas Jambi. Universitas Jambi.
  9. Juhji, J., & Suardi, A. (2018). Profesi guru dalam mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik di era globalisasi. Geneologi PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 5(1), 16–24.
  10. Khoerunnisa, P., & Aqwal, S. M. (2020). Analisis Model-model pembelajaran. Fondatia, 4(1), 1–27.
  11. Laia, B., Laia, R. D., Zai, E. P., Zagoto, I., Zega, U., Harefa, D., & Ndruru, K. (2021). Sosialisasi Pelaksanaan Pengenalan Lapangan Persekolahan I Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021. KOMMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 15–20.
  12. Lpray, C. K. E., & Yilmaz, S. (2015). Contextual Teaching and learning: what it is and why it’s here to stay. United Kingdom, Corwin press.
  13. Maksum, A. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian dalam Olahraga.
  14. Novalinda, R., Giatman, M., & FAJRA, M. (2020). Problem-based learning: 21st century vocational education. International Journal Of Multi Science, 1(08), 12–19.
  15. Novriani, M. R., Nasution, M. D., & Surya, E. (2017). Implementation Strategy Instant Assessment To Increase Activity and Result of Learning Mathematics of Al Maksum Junior High School Student. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(1), 53–60.
  16. Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33.
  17. Raharjo, H. P. (2015). Penerapan Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam Membentuk Karakter Positif Anak. Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport, 2(1), 28–31.
  18. Rahmat, P. S. (2021). Perkembangan peserta didik. Bumi Aksara.
  19. Subadi, T., & Hidayati, E. F. (2013). Lesson Study sebagai inovasi pendidikan.
  20. Syamsuri, A. S., & Md, A. (2021). Pendidikan Guru dan Pembelajaran. Nas Media Pustaka.
  21. Triwiyanto, T. (2021). Pengantar pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
  22. Wali, M., Mbabho, F., & Pali, A. (2020). Pembelajaran Terpadu Tipe Webbed Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 8(3), 404–411.