Main Article Content


Regional Regulation Number 11 of 2017 concerning Organizing Sports is the key to the development of sports, especially educational sports. This Regional Regulation places sport as a very important instrument for regional development. However, at this time, sports are still positioned only as the development of the sport itself. So it is not in accordance with what is stated in Regional Regulation Number 11 of 2017. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to find out the Policy for Development and Development of Sports Education from the Perspective of Regional Regulations. The method used in this research is to use a descriptive qualitative approach. Then by making observations, documentation studies, and interviews as a tool for collecting data and for analyzing the data. The results of this study found that the Policy for Development and Development of Sports Education from the Perspective of Regional Regulations was in accordance with Regional Regulation Number 11 of 2017 concerning Organizing Sports. However, there are still deficiencies and inequalities in several aspects such as facilities and infrastructure, the competency of sports teachers who do not yet have competency certificates from the main sports branch and the uneven distribution of schools in implementing special sports class programs.


Coaching and Development Regional Regulation number 11 of 2017 Sports education

Article Details

How to Cite
Nuzul, A., Yudha Munajat Saputra, Amung Ma’mun, & Boyke Mulyana. (2023). Policy Analysis for Development and Development of Sports Education: Perspective of Regional Regulation Number 11 of 2017 Concerning the Implementation of Sports. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 7(2), 343–352.


  1. Aengevaeren, V. L., Gommans, D. H. F., Dieker, H. J., Timmermans, J., Verheugt, F. W. A., Bakker, J., Eijsvogels, T. M. H. (2019). Association between Lifelong Physical Activity and Disease Characteristics in HCM. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise.
  2. Allender, S., Cowburn, G., & Foster, C. (2020). Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults : a review of qualitative studies. Health Education Research, 21(6), 826–835.
  3. Bjørndal, C. T., & Ronglan, L. T. (2021). Engaging with uncertainty in athlete development–orchestrating talent development through incremental leadership. Sport, Education and Society.
  4. Coakley, J., & Pike, E. (2015). Gender and sports: is equity possible? In Sports in Society: Gender in sports -.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches The Selection of a Research Design. Research Design.
  6. Crowe, R. K., Probst, Y. C., Stanley, R. M., Ryan, S. T., Weaver, R. G., Beets, M. W.Okely, A. D. (2021). Physical activity in out of school hours care: an observational study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.
  7. Department for Education. (2013). Physical education programmes of study: key stages 3 and 4 National curriculum in England Purpose of study. London: DfE.
  8. Green, K. (2014). Mission impossible? Reflecting upon the relationship between physical education, youth sport and lifelong participation. Sport, Education and Society.
  9. Ha, J., Lee, K., & Ok, G. (2016). The International Journal of the History of Sport From Development of Sport to Development through Sport : A Paradigm Shift for Sport Development in South Korea, 3367(February).
  10. Issn, E., Saputra, Y. M., Paramitha, S. T., Ramadhan, M. G., Pendidikan, F., Olah, I., Barat, P. J. (2021). JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga Pendidikan Jasmani Inti dari pembelajaran penjasorkes yang unggul adalah siswa harus menikmati pengalaman dan memilih kegiatan tersebut di luar jam pelajaran secara berkala agar kinerja guru penjasorkes dan hasil belajar siswa dapa.
  11. Jung, H., Pope, S., & Kirk, D. (2016). Policy for physical education and school sport in England, 2003–2010: vested interests and dominant discourses. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 501–516.
  12. Listiandi, A. D., Kusuma, M. N., Syafei, M., Budi, D. R., Hidayat, R., Suhartoyo, T., Anggraeni, D. (2019). The dominant throwing technique (nagewaza) which produces ippon in female judo match at the 18th national sports week (PON XVIII) in Riau. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health.
  13. Ma’mun, A. (2016). Pembudayaan Olahraga dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Nasional Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasi Kebijakan. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan, 9(1), 65–88.
  14. MacIntosh, E. W., Parent, M. M., & Culver, D. (2022). Understanding Young Athletes’ Learning at the Youth Olympic Games: A Sport Development Perspective. Journal of Global Sport Management.
  15. Muñoz, A. R., & Prieto Andreu, J. M. (2021). Analysis of the psychological skills of promising athletes and talents from Gipuzkoa. Retos.
  16. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Presiden Desain Besar Olahraga Nasional Nomor 86 Tahun 2021 Tentang Desain Besar Olahraga Nasional, 1–5.
  17. Pike, E. C. J., & Maguire, J. A. (2003). Injury in Women’s Sport: Classifying Key Elements of “Risk Encounters.” Sociology of Sport Journal.
  18. Rocavert, C. (2016). Aspiring to the Creative Class: Reality Television and the Role of the Mentor. M/C Journal.
  19. Ruseski, J. E., & Maresova, K. (2014). Economic Freedom , Sport Policy , and Individual Participation in Physical Activity : an International Comparison. Contemporary Economic Policy (ISSN, 32(1), 42–55.
  20. Seippel, Ø., & Belbo, J. S. (2021). Sport clubs, policy networks, and local politics. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics.
  21. Teixeira, M. R. C., & Ribeiro, T. (2016). Sport Policy and Sports Development : Study of Demographic , Organizational , Financial and Political Dimensions to the Local Level in Portugal. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 26–34.
  22. Zhang, B. (2019). Regional sports industrial development strategy in the vision of “Healthy China 2030.” Ekoloji.