Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 12, 2023
Accepted
June 26, 2023
Published
June 26, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 216 Download : 109

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the initial reference and see other research perspectives as a basis for developing appropriate teaching methods in physical education.  This research method uses a literature review using the google scholar search database, eric journal, and Springer. id with keywords analysis methods, creative, innovative, demonstrative, active, humanist in physical education.  The articles analyzed are published from 2016 to 2021 using the following specific criteria: indexed by Scopus Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4. Then national articles indexed sinta 1, sinta 2, sinta 3, and sinta 4. The descriptive method with population, sample, and subject is learners of primary school level. The results of this study can be concluded that the teaching method of AKIDAH-based physical education (Analysis, Creative, Innovative, Demonstrative, Active, and Humanist) is a way of teaching with an approach that is relevant to the development of the times. Choosing a learning method must pay attention to the development and growth of learners, and pay attention to humanist principles with indicators of concern. Analysis of teaching needs requires accuracy, accuracy, suitability (analysis), teaching attracts students (creativity), requires breakthroughs / new things because of the development of science and technology/era (innovative), teachers must be able to become models (demonstrative), how students become (active) in teaching and learning activities of physical education, teaching must humanize humans (humanist) pay attention to the growth and development of students.

Keywords

Active Analytical Creative Demonstrative Humanist Innovative

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Pungki Indarto, Gatot Jariono, Rahma Tulloh, Haris Nugroho, Andi Ihsan, Uzizatun Maslikah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Pungki Indarto, Jariono, G., Rahma Tulloh, Haris Nugroho, Andi Ihsan, & Uzizatun Maslikah. (2023). Akidah Based Teaching Methods (Analytical, Creative, Innovative, Demonstrative, Active, Humanist) In Elementary Schools: A Literature Review. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 7(2), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i2.27486
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., Johansson, A., & Korp, P. (2021). Fit for the job? How corporeal expectations shape physical education teachers’ understandings of content, pedagogy, and the purposes of physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1934664
  2. Brown, J. (2015). Evaluating surveys of transparent governance. In : UNDESA (United nations Departement of Economic and Social Affairs), 6th Global forum on reinventing government : towards participatory and transparent governance. Seoul, Republic of Korea 24-27 May 2005. New York: United Nations. p.27-35
  3. Chang, C. M., Hsieh, H. H., Chou, Y. H., & Huang, H. C. (2021). The relationship between physical education teachers’ perceptions of principals’ transformational leadership and creative teaching behavior at junior and senior high schools: A cross-level moderating effect on innovative school climates. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158184
  4. Cheng, J. (2021). Evaluation of physical education teaching based on web embedded system and virtual reality. Microprocessors and Microsystems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.103980
  5. Dupri, Nazirun, N., & Candra, O. (2021). Creative Thinking Learning of Physical Education: Can Be Enhanced Using Discovery Learning Model? Journal Sport Area. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(1).5690
  6. Erwin, H. E., Beighle, A., & Eckler, S. (2017). PETE Preparation for CSPAP at the University of Kentucky. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1250532
  7. Hou, Y., & Liu, S. (2021). Research on green physical education teaching method from the perspective of ecological civilization. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin.
  8. Kim, S. Y. (2020). A Qualitative Exploration of Effective Creative / Convergence Type of Class in Middle and High School Physical Education Classes. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i15.18721
  9. Kotzee, B. (2020). Show and Tell: Demonstration as Practical Testimony. Journal of Philosophy of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12424
  10. Kwon, B. M., & Park, S. G. (2019). The effects of pre-service adapted physical education teachers’ creative teaching tools development and application class on academic interest and self-leadership. Korean Journal of Physical, Multiple and Health Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.20971/kcpmd.2019.62.2.167
  11. Li, Y., & Li, W. (2021). A review of research on ethic of care in physical education and physical activity settings. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. https://doi.org/10.1123/JTPE.2019-0143
  12. Li, Z., & Wang, H. (2021). The effectiveness of physical education teaching in college based on Artificial intelligence methods. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189370
  13. Liu, F. (2021). The Reform of College Physical Education Teaching Methods under the Background of Big Data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1744/3/032005
  14. López Pastor, V. M., Soria, M. M., Arias, C. P., & Arribas, J. C. M. (2020). The importance of using Formative and Shared Assessment in Physical Education Teacher Education: Tutored Learning Projects as an example of good practice. Retos.
  15. Łuba-Arnista, W., & Biegajło, M. (2020). Observational learning with externally imposed and self-controlled frequency of model demonstration. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2020-0013
  16. Luo, X. (2021). Quantitative Analysis on the Evaluation Indicators of Teaching Abilities of Physical Education Teachers in Colleges and Universities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i18.25661
  17. Ma, H. (2020). Building the Training System of Physical Education Innovation Ability in Higher Vocational Colleges Based on Computer Information Technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1578/1/012064
  18. Moen, K. M., Westlie, K., Gerdin, G., Smith, W., Linnér, S., Philpot, R., Schenker, K., & Larsson, L. (2020). Caring teaching and the complexity of building good relationships as pedagogies for social justice in health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1683535
  19. Ryan, S., Maina, M., & Mokgwathi, M. (2016). Strategies for More Effective Demonstrations. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2016.1142212
  20. Simonton, K. L., Garn, A. C., & Washburn, N. (2021). Caring Climate, Emotions, and Engagement in High School Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2021-0086
  21. Supriyadi, M. (2018). Pelaksanaan Proses Belajar Mengajar Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan pada Sekolah Dasar. Gelanggang Olahraga: Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Olahraga (JPJO). https://doi.org/10.31539/jpjo.v1i2.136
  22. van Doodewaard, C., Knoppers, A., & van Hilvoorde, I. (2018). ‘Of course I ask the best students to demonstrate’: digital normalizing practices in physical education. Sport, Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1483908
  23. Ward, P., Ayvazo, S., Dervent, F., Iserbyt, P., Kim, I., & Li, W. (2020). Skill Analysis for Teachers: Considerations for Physical Education Teacher Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1853635
  24. Webster, C. A., D’Agostino, E., Urtel, M., McMullen, J., Culp, B., Egan Loiacono, C. A., & Killian, C. (2021). Physical education in the COVID era: Considerations for online program delivery using the comprehensive school physical activity program framework. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. https://doi.org/10.1123/JTPE.2020-0182
  25. Zhang, J. Y. (2020). Research on the Promotion Strategy of Multimedia Network Educational Platform in College Sports Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022084