Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 12, 2023
Accepted
June 26, 2023
Published
June 26, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 288 Download : 211

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The tactical and technical approach model is an approach model that is often used in physical education, especially in game sports, one of which is basketball. This study aims to determine the different effects of tactical and technical learning models on students' understanding and skills in basketball. The method and design of this study used an experimental method with pre-test and post-test design groups. The research sample is composed of high school students, with a total of 48 students. 12 students using a technical approach and 12 tactical students The instrument uses GPAI (Games Performance Instrument Analysis). The results obtained (1) test the similarity of the average of the two skills obtained. 000 for technical and 0.000 for tactical, it can be concluded that the two models have significant differences in basketball playing skills. (2) Then the two models have different average values; the playing skills score of the tactical approach model is 0.67 and the technical approach model is 0.55. The difference between the two approach models shows that the tactical approach model has a significantly greater effect than the technical approach model.

Keywords

Basketball Tactical Approach Model

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Sucipto, Agus Gumilar, Alpi Pebria Lestari, Burhan Hambali

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Sucipto, Gumilar, A., Lestari, A. P., & Hambali, B. (2023). A Comparison of Tactic and Technical Approaches to Student Basketball Skills. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 7(2), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i2.27490
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Abduljabar, B. (2011). Pengertian pendidikan jasmani. Ilmu Pendidikan, 36, 1991.
  2. Akbar, A. (2015). Kontribusi Kecerdasan Kinestetik, Motor Ability dan Motivasi dengan Keterampilan Bermain Bola Basket. Sport Pedagogy Journal, 5(1).
  3. Chatzipanteli, A., Digelidis, N., Karatzoglidis, C., & Dean, R. (2016). A tactical-game approach and enhancement of metacognitive behaviour in elementary school students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(2), 169-184.
  4. Ennis, C. D. (2011). Physical education curriculum priorities: Evidence for education and skillfulness. Quest, 63(1), 5-18.
  5. Ferrans, C. E., Zerwic, J. J., Wilbur, J. E., & Larson, J. L. (2005). Conceptual model of health‐related quality of life. Journal of nursing scholarship, 37(4), 336-342.
  6. Gabbett, T., Jenkins, D., & Abernethy, B. (2009). Game-based training for improving skill and physical fitness in team sport athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(2), 273-283.
  7. Güneş, B., & Yilmaz, E. (2019). The Effect Of Tactical Games Approach In Basketball Teaching On Cognitive, Affective And Psychomotor Achievement Levels Of High School Students. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education And Science, 44(200).
  8. Haris, A., & Ghazali, M. I. (2018). Development of mutual adaptation model PE teaching in Indonesia. Development, 3(4).
  9. Himberg, C., Hutchinson, G., & Roussell, J. M. (2003). Teaching secondary physical education: Preparing adolescents to be active for life. Human Kinetics 1.
  10. Hopper, T. (2002). Teaching games for understanding: The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 73(7), 44-48.
  11. Jones, R., Marshall, S., & Peters, D. M. (2010). Can we play a game now? The intrinsic benefits of TGfU. European Journal of Physical & Health Education: Social Humanistic Perspective, 4, 57-64.
  12. Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 177-192.
  13. Komariyah, L., Roring, L. A., Gumilar, A., Hambali, B., Martini, T., & Rahma, T. A. (2021). Lifestyle Of Indonesian Education University Students During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Kinestetik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 5(4), 782-787.
  14. Mahendra, A. (2007). Teori belajar mengajar motorik. Bandung: FPOK UPI.
  15. Metzler, M. (2017). Instructional Models in Physical Education. Taylor & Francis.
  16. Mitchell, S., Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J., & Griffin, L. L. (2020). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Human Kinetics Publishers.
  17. Nur, L, Agi G, Arief A M, & Les P. (2021). “Validity and Reliability of Elementary School Students’ Learning Motivation Instruments in Physical Education.” Jurnal Maenpo: Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Kesehatan Dan Rekreasi 11(2): 205–15.
  18. Penney, D, & Tim C. (2000). “Physical Education: What Future (S)?” Sport, education and society 5(1): 71–87.
  19. Priklerová, S and Ivan K. (2015). “Efficiency of Technical and Tactical Approach to Teaching Mini Handball Game Skills in Different Age Categories.” Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae 55(2): 132–40.
  20. Quay, J, and Jacqui P. (2008). “Skills, Strategies, Sport, and Social Responsibility: Reconnecting Physical Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 40(5): 601–26.
  21. Rink, J E. (2013). “Measuring Teacher Effectiveness in Physical Education.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 84(4): 407–18.
  22. Sgrò, F, Salvatore B, Salvatore P, & Mario L. (2018). “Small-Sided Games and Technical Skills in Soccer Training: Systematic Review and Implications for Sport and Physical Education Practitioners.” Journal of sports science 6(1): 9–19.
  23. Sitepu, I, D. (2018). “Manfaat Permainan Bola Basket Untuk Anak Usia Dini.” Jurnal Prestasi 2(3): 27–33.
  24. Subroto, T. (2003). “Pembelajaran Keterampilan Dan Konsep Olahraga Di Sekolah Dasar.” Jakarta: Depdiknas-Dirjen Dikdasmen-Bekerjasama dengan Dirjen Olahraga.
  25. Sucipto(2021). “Application of Tactical Approach to Developing Students’ Enjoyment and Skills in Playing Football.” International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences 9(4): 100–105.
  26. Sucipto,. (2019). “The Implementation of Tactical Approach on Students’ Enjoyment in Playing Football in Junior High School.” Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga 4(1): 14–20.
  27. Sugiyono, (2013). “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D.”
  28. Suherman, A. (2018). Kurikulum Pembelajaran Penjas. UPI Sumedang Press.
  29. Wright, S, Mike M, & Joan M.. (2009). “The Tactical Approach to Teaching Games from Teaching, Learning and Mentoring Perspectives.” Sport, Education and Society 14(2): 223–44.