Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 30, 2023
Accepted
October 3, 2023
Published
September 30, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 192 Download : 161

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims for the future to facilitate Physical Education Study Program students with various teaching materials to support blended learning. Learning. Especially teaching materials that help students' cognitive learning. Because it is known that nowadays and with the sophistication of technology, learning can be done anywhere and at any time by students. In fact, this also makes the college learning process easier because having teaching materials as a learning resource for students can help learning in lectures become more effective and efficient. Because having additional teaching materials as a student learning resource will enrich student knowledge. Specifically for this research, teaching materials will be developed using the Thunkable Tennis Court application. In the future, there will be gradual development for other types of teaching materials and other materials as well. As is known, the physical education study program is closely related to learning movement. Learning to move yourself is also divided into several stages which include cognitive, associative and automatic stages. The cognitive stage is the beginning and basis that influences success at other stages. Because it is necessary for an educator to provide effective and efficient learning at this stage and provide enrichment of knowledge to students by using up-to-date teaching materials in accordance with current developments. The method to achieve this goal will be Research and Development from year to year. What is certain is that the Research and Development stage begins with needs analysis, product development, validation, testing and publication.

Keywords

Blended Learning Thunkable Tennis

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Septian Raibowo, Dian Pujianto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Raibowo, S., & Pujianto, D. (2023). Development of Teaching Materials with Thunkable Applications to Support Blended Learning in Tennis. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 7(3), 707–715. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i3.29844
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Akbar, S., & Sriwiyana, H. (2010). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran—Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS). (1st ed.). Cipta Media.
  2. Berie, Z., Damtie, D., & Bogale, Y. N. (2022). Inquiry-Based Learning in Science Education: A Content Analysis of Research Papers in Ethiopia (2010–2021). Education Research International, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6329643
  3. Bostanci, Ö. (2020). Learning Style Preferences of Prospective Teachers of Physical Education and Sport. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2020.62.231.236
  4. Canpolat, A. M. (2019). The relationship between academic self-efficacy, learning styles and epistemological beliefs: A study on the students of the school of physical education and sports. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v11i4.4401
  5. Childs K, L., Edwards, M., & Smith, M. D. (2020). Use of Learning Style Frameworks in Health Science Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(7), ajpe7885. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7885
  6. Corbin, C. B. (2021). Conceptual physical education: A course for the future. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 10(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.10.004
  7. Defliyanto, Prabowo, A., Ilahi, B. R., Syafrial, Sutisyana, A., Arwin, & Permadi, A. (2022). Development of Penjasor Management Learning Media Based on Smart Learning System Assisted MIT APP Thunkable in Merdeka Belajar Era – Kampus Merdeka. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(4), 814–820. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v6i4.25292
  8. Eggers, J. H., Oostdam, R., & Voogt, J. (2021). Self-regulation strategies in blended learning environments in higher education: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6453
  9. El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
  10. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
  11. Lee, W. W., & Owens, D. L. (2000). Multimedia-based instructional design: Computer-based training, Web-based training, distance broadcast training. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
  12. Merta, L. W. S., Ratminingsih, N. M., & Budasi, I. G. (2023). The Integration of Technology in English Language Teaching to Stimulate Students’ Critical Thinking. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 17(2), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v17i2.39097
  13. Montero, C., & Cervelló, E. (2020). Teaching Styles in Physical Education: A New Approach to Predicting Resilience and Bullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010076
  14. Munna, A. S., & Kalam, A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: A literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation, 4(1), 1–4.
  15. Nind, M., Holmes, M., Insenga, M., Lewthwaite, S., & Sutton, C. (2020). Student Perspectives on Learning Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(7), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1592150
  16. Oktova, R., & Rahmi, L. (2021). Developing Blended Learning With the Use of I-Learn in Block 1.A (Introduction to Midwifery Education). 506. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210202.083
  17. Ortelli, P., Ferrazzoli, D., Maestri, R., Saltuari, L., Kofler, M., Alibardi, A., Koch, G., Spampinato, D., Castagna, A., Sebastianelli, L., & Versace, V. (2021). Experimental Protocol to Test Explicit Motor Learning–Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 2, 720184. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.720184
  18. Permata Sari, D. A., Widodo, W., Mahdiannur, M. A., Aulia, E. V., Subekti, H., & Hidayati, S. N. (2022). Feasibility Analysis of Interactive Multimedia on Intercation of Living Things Topic to Promote Scientific Literacy Skills. SHS Web of Conferences, 149, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214901020
  19. Raibowo, S., Fathoni, A. F., & Adi, S. (2022). Feasibility of audio-visual teaching materials to support tennis learning. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 10(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v10i2.48830
  20. Raibowo, S., & Nopiyanto, Y. E. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Kesehatan pada SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Mukomuko melalui Pendekatan Model Context, Input, Process & Product (CIPP). Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, Vol. 6(No. 2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3881891
  21. Raibowo, S., Wulandari, I., Prabowo, A., Permadi, A., & Barnanda Rizky, O. (2023). Kecemasan dan Konsentrasi Pada Atlet Tenis Lapangan POMNAS XVII Sumatera Barat 2022. Jurnal Kejaora (Kesehatan Jasmani dan Olah Raga), 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.36526/kejaora.v8i1.2418
  22. Reigeluth, C. M. (2016). Instructional Theory and Technology for the New Paradigm of Education. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 2(50). https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/1b
  23. Saifuddin, S, P., Kamdi, W., Dwiyogo, W. D., & Nugroho, H. S. W. (2018). The effect of blended learning and self-efficacy on learning outcome of problem solving (Learning strategy improvement for health students). Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(11), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01481.X
  24. Sugihartono, T. (2019). Model Problem Based Learning Meningkatkan Keterampilan Senam Irama Pada Pembelajara Penjasorkes. Altius: Jurnal Ilmu Olahraga dan Kesehatan, 8(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.36706/altius.v8i1.8274
  25. Yusandra, T. F. (2021). Utilization of Audio Visual Media As an Online Learning Solution During The Covid-19 Pandemic. 1, 1281–1289.