Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 17, 2023
Accepted
June 5, 2024
Published
March 31, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 98 Download : 123

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Obstacles in the learning process need to be an important concern for every lecturer in charge of the subject. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to reveal the learning barriers of physical education students in attending basic research lectures. The qualitative descriptive method is implemented to achieve research objectives. A total of 43 physical education students were involved in this study as subjects who provided the required information. Instruments consisting of observation, documentation, and semi-structured interviews are used to collect the required data. Analysis of the collected data using data triangulation. The results of the study stated that students experienced obstacles in attending basic research lectures, especially in the section on compiling research backgrounds and conducting research data analysis. 

Keywords

Obstacles Research Students

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Yahya Eko Nopiyanto, Yarmani, Tono Sugihartono, Arwin Arwin, Syafrial Syafrial, Ari Sutisyana, Dian Pujianto, Andika Prabowo, Ipa Sari Kardi, Ibrahim Ibrahim, Cahyo Wibowo, Arief Ibnu Haryanto, Rasyono Rasyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Yahya Eko Nopiyanto, Yarmani, Tono Sugihartono, Arwin, A., Syafrial, S., Ari Sutisyana, Dian Pujianto, Andika Prabowo, Ipa Sari Kardi, Ibrahim, I., Cahyo Wibowo, Arief Ibnu Haryanto, & Rasyono, R. (2024). Analysis of Physical Education Students’ Learning Obstacles in basic Research Course. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 8(1), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v8i1.31781
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Baimyrzaeva, M. (2018). Beginners’ Guide for Applied Research Process: What Is It, and Why and How to Do It? In University of Central Asia: Graduate School of Development. (Vol. 4).
  2. Bavdekar, S. B. (2016). Enhance the value of a research paper: Choosing the right references and writing them accurately. Journal of Association of Physicians of India, 64(MARCH), 66–70.
  3. Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2018). Does Remediation Work for All Students? How the Effects of Postsecondary Remedial and Developmental Courses Vary by Level of Academic Preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717715708
  4. Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2023). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
  5. Bowles, T. V., & Brindle, K. A. (2017). Identifying facilitating factors and barriers to improving student retention rates in tertiary teaching courses: a systematic review. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(5), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1264927
  6. Budhyani, I. D. A. M., & Angendari, M. D. (2021). Kesulitan dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Mimbar Ilmu, 26(3), 400. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v26i3.40678
  7. Daniel, F., & Taneo, P. N. L. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Penyusunan Proposal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 4(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v4i2.956
  8. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  9. Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL Learners’ Writing Skills: Problems, Factors and Suggestions. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 4(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0421604201
  10. Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2015). Investigating Learning Challenges Faced by Students in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.001
  11. Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
  12. Heale, R., & Forbes, D. (2013). Understanding triangulation in research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101494
  13. Jackson, D. (2017). Exploring the challenges experienced by international students during work-integrated learning in Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(3), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1298515
  14. Jufri, M. S. S. dan L. (2018). Deskripsi Kemampuan Mahasiswa Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan Iain Kendari Dalam Menganalisis Data Statistika. Jurnal Al-Ta’dib, 11(1), 109–126.
  15. Junaedi, I., Asikin, M., & Masrukan, M. (2015). Penerapan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) dengan Konteks Karakter dan Konservasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i2.4988
  16. Khedri, M., & Kritsis, K. (2020). How do we make ourselves heard in the writing of a research article? A study of authorial references in four disciplines. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 40(2), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2020.1753011
  17. Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. Research in Nursing and Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
  18. Lozano, F. J., & Lozano, R. (2014). Developing the curriculum for a new Bachelor’s degree in Engineering for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.022
  19. Miller, C. J., & Metz, M. J. (2014). A comparison of professional-level faculty and student perceptions of active learning: Its current use, effectiveness, and barriers. Advances in Physiology Education, 38(3), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00014.2014
  20. Pacello, J. (2014). Integrating Metacognition into a Developmental Reading and Writing Course to Promote Skill Transfer: An Examination of Student Perceptions and Experiences. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2014.906240
  21. Purwanto, A., Pramono, R., Bernarto, I., Asbari, M., Santoso, P. B., Saifuddin, M. P., Hyun, C. C., Wijayanti, L. M., Ong, F., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2020). Minat dan Hambatan Publikasi Artikel pada Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi: Studi Eksploratori pada Mahasiswa Doktoral di Sebuah Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Jakarta. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v4i1.348
  22. Regmi, K., & Jones, L. (2020). A systematic review of the factors - Enablers and barriers - Affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6
  23. Ridwan, M., AM, S., Ulum, B., & Muhammad, F. (2021). Pentingnya Penerapan Literature Review pada Penelitian Ilmiah. Jurnal Masohi, 2(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.36339/jmas.v2i1.427
  24. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  25. Solum, E. M., Maluwa, V. M., Tveit, B., & Severinsson, E. (2016). Enhancing students’ moral competence in practice: Challenges experienced by Malawian nurse teachers. Nursing Ethics, 23(6), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733015580811
  26. Tutpai, G., & Er Unja, E. (2022). Hambatan Dalam Penyusunan Proposal Penelitian Oleh Mahasiswa Keperawatan Stikes Suaka Insan Banjarmasin. Jurnal Keperawatan Suaka Insan (Jksi), 7(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.51143/jksi.v7i1.322
  27. Winchester, C. L., & Salji, M. (2016). Writing a literature review. Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(5), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415816650133