Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 10, 2024
Accepted
March 25, 2024
Published
March 25, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 29 Download : 20

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to investigate differences in the quality of physical fitness of students in cities and villages, which are influenced by geographical location and different daily activities. The research method used was quantitative descriptive with a population and sample of 160 people. The data analysis technique applied is the Mann-Whitney Test. The results showed quantitatively significant differences between the two groups, with the average difference showing that fitness in villages reached 5.42 compared to students in cities. This indicates that the group of students in the village has a higher level of fitness than the group of students in the city. The fitness assessment using the Indonesian Physical Fitness Test (TKJI) category shows that students in the city are in the Medium fitness category, while students in the village are in the Good fitness category. The findings illustrate that more active physical activity in villages may be the cause of the difference. Students in villages tend to have a more active lifestyle, engaging in physical activities such as walking, running, and jumping, while students in cities tend to spend their free time playing with gadgets. In conclusion, the results of this study support the view that geographical factors and daily activities affect students' fitness levels, with implications for TKJI categories that indicate better fitness levels in villages than cities.

Keywords

Cities and Villages Geographical Location Physical Fitness

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Gunawan Gunawan, Tatang Muhtar, Dewi Susilawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Gunawan, G., Tatang Muhtar, & Dewi Susilawati. (2024). Comparison of the Quality of Physical Fitness of Elementary School Students in Cities and Villages based on Geographical Location. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 8(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v8i1.33096
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Abdurrahim, & Hariadi. (2018). Tingkat Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa SDN Tulungrejo 03 Daerah Dataran Tinggi Kecamatan Bumiaji Kota Batu Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Indonesia Performance Journal, 2(2), 68–73.
  2. Cocca, A., Espino Verdugo, F., Ródenas Cuenca, L. T., & Cocca, M. (2020). Effect of a game-based physical education program on physical fitness and mental health in elementary school children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4883.
  3. Eni. (1967). 済無No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., Mi, 5–24.
  4. Faqih, A., & Hartati, S. C. (2017). Survei Tingkat Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa Kelas IV dan V Sekolah Dasar Se-Gugus Selatan Kecamatan Plumpang Kabupaten Tuban. Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga Dan Kesehatan, 5(3), 385–390.
  5. Ferdian, R., Hardiansyah, S., & Maifitri, F. (2022). Perbedaan Tingkat Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa SMPN 13 Padang Dengan Siswa SMPN 1 Sungai Beremas. Jurnal JPDO, 5(2), 103–110.
  6. Firmansyah, D. (2022). Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(2), 85–114.
  7. Gunarsa, S. D., & Wibowo, S. (2021). Hubungan Kualitas Tidur Dengan Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga Dan Kesehatan, 09(01), 43–52.
  8. Iyakrus, I. (2019). Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga Dan Prestasi. Altius : Jurnal Ilmu Olahraga Dan Kesehatan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.36706/altius.v7i2.8110
  9. Kapti, J., & Winarno, M. E. (2022). Hubungan Kebugaran Jasmani dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Penjas SMP: Literature Review. Sport Science and Health, 4(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.17977/um062v4i32022p258-267
  10. Kholmirzaevich, A. J. (2022). Inovasi dalam Pekerjaan Kebugaran dan Fisik Pendidikan. 159–161.
  11. Mustafa, P. S., & Dwiyogo, W. D. (2020). Kurikulum pendidikan jasmani, olahraga, dan kesehatan di Indonesia abad 21. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Dan Inovasi Pendidikan (JARTIKA), 3(2), 422–438.
  12. Narlan, A., & Juniar, D. T. (2020). Pengukuran Dan Evaluasi Olahraga (Prosedur Pelaksanaan Tes Dan Pengukuran Dalam Olahraga Pendidikan Dan Prestasi). Deepublish.
  13. Pardede, R., & Watini, S. (2021). Dampak penggunaan gadget pada perkembangan emosional anak usia dini di TK Adifa Karang Mulya Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(2), 4728–4735.
  14. Prastyawan, R. R., & Pulungan, K. A. (2022). Signifikansi Kebugaran Jasmani Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 18(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v18i2.55859
  15. Prianto, D. A., Utomo, M. A. S., Abi Permana, D. A. P., & Mutohir, T. C. (2022). Survey Tingkat Kebugaran Jasmani dan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Sidoarjo. Jurnal Segar, 10(2), 49–56.
  16. Risbon Sianturi, Aini Loita, T. M. U. (2022). Eskalasi Instrumen Deteksi Dini Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(4), 2561–2571.
  17. Rocliffe, P., O’ Keeffe, B. T., Sherwin, I., Mannix-McNamara, P., & Mac Donncha, C. (2023). A National Audit of Typical Secondary School Provision of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sports in the Republic of Ireland. Education Sciences, 13(7), 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070699
  18. Sari, D. N. (2020). Tinjauan Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Sporta Saintika, 5(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.24036/sporta.v5i2.149
  19. Sastro Desmianto Ginting. (2022). Tingkat Kebugaran Jasmani Dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar Negeri Di Desa Bayat Kecamatan Belantikan Raya. Jurnal Kejaora (Kesehatan Jasmani Dan Olahraga), 7(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.36526/kejaora.v7i2.2155
  20. Setiawan, N. (2015). Teknik Sampling ,Parung , Bogor. 25–28.
  21. Subakti, H., & Prasetya, K. H. (2022). Permasalahan dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(6), 10067–10078. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i6.3029
  22. Sutisna, I. (2020). Statistika penelitian. Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, 1(1), 1–15.
  23. Taib, I., Osman, K., Hermawan, H., & Abd Kadir, M. R. (2013). Preliminary Study on the Comparable Flow Pattern Between Stented and Non-Stented Aneurysm at Hypertension Condition. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 388, 29–33.
  24. Wang, C., Dev, R. D. O., Soh, K. G., Nasiruddin, N. J. M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Effects of Blended Learning in Physical Education among University Students: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080530
  25. Zellatifanny, C. M., & Mudjiyanto, B. (2018). Tipe Penelitian Deskripsi Dalam Ilmu Komunikasi. Diakom : Jurnal Media Dan Komunikasi, 1(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.17933/diakom.v1i2.20