Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 20, 2023
Accepted
May 10, 2023
Published
May 16, 2023
Download
PDF Similiarity
Statistic
Read Counter : 783 Download : 736

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRAK


 


Salah satu kemampuan yang harus dimiliki oleh mahasiswa calon guru adalah kemampuan penalaran ilmiah. Meskipun demikian, kemampuan ini masih belum dilatihkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan penalaran ilmiah mahasiswa calon guru pada materi suhu dan kalor. Penelitian ini merupakan studi deskriptif dengan melibatkan 57 mahasiswa yang mengikuti perkuliahan fisika umum di UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta tahun ajaran 2021/2022 selama empat bulan. Berbeda dengan kegiatan praktikum yang biasanya verifikatif, perkuliahan ini menggunakan modul Higher Order Thinking Laboratory (HOT-LAB) yang memuat Real World Problem pada tahap pra-praktikum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pola penalaran ilmiah mahasiswa adalah penalaran probabilistik sebesar 84% yang terdiri dari 56% pada level 2 dimana merupakan kemampuan mahasiswa menjelaskan secara kualitatif, dan 44% pada level 3 dimana kemampuan mahasiswa menjelaskan secara kuantitatif. Sedangkan 16% pola penalaran mahasiswa adalah penalaran korelasi. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa sebagian besar pola penalaran ilmiah mahasiswa calon guru dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan yang diberikan adalah penalaran probabilistik.


 


Kata  kunci: Kalorimeter, Penalaran Ilmiah, Suhu dan Kalor,


 


ABSTRACT


 


The capacity for scientific reasoning is one of the talents that potential teacher candidates must possess. But this talent is still untrained. The purpose of this study is to evaluate prospective teacher students' capacity for scientific reasoning with regard to temperature and heat-related. This research is a descriptive study involving 57 students who attend general physics lectures at UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta for the academic year 2021/2022 for four months. Different from practicum activities which are usually verified, this lecture uses the Higher Order Thinking Laboratory (HOT-LAB) module which contains Real World Problems at the pre-practicum stage. The results showed that the pattern of students' scientific reasoning was probabilistic reasoning by 84%, This comprises of 44% at level 3 where the student's quantitative explanation ability is assessed, and 56% at level 2 where the student's ability to explain qualitatively is assessed. While 16% of students' reasoning patterns are correlational reasoning. Therefore, it can be stated that the majority of prospective teachers' students' scientific reasoning techniques for addressing temperature and heat-related problems are probabilistic reasoning.


 


Keywords: calorimeter, scientific reasoning, temperature and heat-related,

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Firman Harris Saputra, Fathiah Alatas, Ahmad Suryadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Kumparan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Harris Saputra, F., Fathiah Alatas, & Ahmad Suryadi. (2023). JENIS PENALARAN ILMIAH APA YANG DIGUNAKAN MAHASISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERMASALAHAN SUHU DAN KALOR?: STUDI PADA PRAKTIKUM FISIKA UMUM: Indonesia. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 6(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.6.1.27-36
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Citation S. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. 2012. 1–385 p.
  2. Das N. Importance of Science in School Curriculum Implementation of Cloud Data Center for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) in Nepal View project Importance of Science in School Curriculum. WeSchool Knowl Build Natl J. 2014;
  3. Schlatter E, Lazonder AW, Molenaar I, Janssen N. Individual differences in children’s scientific reasoning. Educ Sci. 2021;11(9):1–13.
  4. Schlatter E, Molenaar I, Lazonder AW. Learning scientific reasoning: A latent transition analysis. Learn Individ Differ [Internet]. 2021;92(December 2020):102043. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102043
  5. Boyle WPI. Measuring the effect of content updates in an undergraduate non-major’s physics laboratory. 2017; Available from: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ACCESSION_NUM:miami1498261226912787
  6. Dewi N, Ristiati N, … IW-… V of E-BU in, 2020 undefined. Increasing Students Science Process Skill Using Cooperative Type GI (Group Investigation) and TGT (Team Game Tournament). asian-efl-journal.com [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 6]; Available from: http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/AEJ-GCTALE-Volume-1.pdf#page=4
  7. Echevarria M. The nature of middle school students’ knowledge construction and scientific reasoning during inquiry in genetics. 1999 [cited 2022 Nov 6]; Available from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/7ca4d25039057dd66d72d51de079adb2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  8. Nieminen P, Savinainen A, Viiri J. Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning. Phys Rev Spec Top - Phys Educ Res. 2012;8(1):1–10.
  9. Gerber BL, Cavallo AML, Marek EA. Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. Int J Sci Educ. 2001;23(5):535–49.
  10. Steinberg R, Cormier S. Understanding and affecting science teacher candidates’ scientific reasoning in introductory astrophysics. Phys Rev Spec Top - Phys Educ Res. 2013;9(2):1–10.
  11. Piraksa C, Srisawasdi N, Koul R. Effect of Gender on Student’s Scientific Reasoning Ability: A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. 2014;116(February):486–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.245
  12. Khoirina M, Cari C, Sukarmin. Identify Students’ Scientific Reasoning Ability at Senior High School. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1097(1).
  13. Suryadi A, Yuliati L, Wisodo H. Students’ scientific reasoning on temperature and heat topic: A comparative study of students in urban and rural area. Momentum Phys Educ J. 2020;4(1):19–29.
  14. Prasitpong S, Rakkapao S. Investigation of Thai university students’ scientific reasoning abilities. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1287(1).
  15. Santiani S. Keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa fisika STAIN Palangka Raya pada praktikum fisika dasar I. Edu Sains J Pendidik Sains dan Mat [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Nov 6];1(2). Available from: https://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/edusains/article/view/9
  16. Wenning CJ, Khan MA. Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching : Learning sequences to lesson plans. J Phys Teach Educ Online. 2011;6(2):17–20.
  17. Malik A, Setiawan A, Suhandi A, Permanasari A, Samsudin A, Dirgantara Y, et al. The development of higher order thinking laboratory (hotlab) model related to heat transfer topic. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1204(1).
  18. Malik A, Setiawan A. The Development of Higher Order Thinking Laboratory to Improve Transferable Skills of Students. 2016;(January).
  19. Setiawan A, Malik A, Suhandi A, Permanasari A. Effect of Higher Order Thinking Laboratory on the Improvement of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;306(1).
  20. Setya W, Agustina RD, Putra RP, Prihatini S, Hidayatulloh R, Isnaeni PS, et al. Implementation of higher order thinking laboratory (HOTLAB) on magnetic field with real blended virtual laboratory to improve students critical thinking skills. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;2098(1).
  21. Sapriadil S, Setiawan A, Suhandi A, Malik A, Safitri D, Lisdiani SAS, et al. Optimizing students’ scientific communication skills through higher order thinking virtual laboratory (HOTVL). J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. 2018 May 1 [cited 2022 Nov 6];1013(1):012050. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012050
  22. Karplus R, Adi H, Lawson AE. Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School VIII: Proportional, Probabilistic, and Correlational Reasoning. Sch Sci Math. 1980;80(8):673–83.
  23. Jufri AW, Setiadi D, Sripatmi. Scientific reasoning ability of prospective student teacher in the excellence program of mathematics and science teacher education in University of Mataram. J Pendidik IPA Indones. 2016;5(1):69–74.
  24. Ding L, Wei X, Mollohan K. Does Higher Education Improve Student Scientific Reasoning Skills? Int J Sci Math Educ 2014 144 [Internet]. 2014 Dec 11 [cited 2022 Nov 6];14(4):619–34. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10763-014-9597-y
  25. Erdem E. An investigation of the seventh grade students’ mathematical and probabilistic reasoning skills (MA Thesis). 2011;(December 2011).
  26. Woolley JS, Deal AM, Green J, Hathenbruck F, Kurtz SA, Park TKH, et al. Undergraduate students demonstrate common false scientific reasoning strategies. Think Ski Creat [Internet]. 2018;27(April 2017):101–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.004
  27. Utami DS, Muharrami LK, Hadi WP, Ahied M. Profil Scientific Reasoning Ability Siswa Pada Materi Gerak Benda. Quantum J Inov Pendidik Sains. 2020;11(2):93.
  28. Suryadi A, Yuliati L, Wisodo H. The effect of STEM-based phenomenon learning on improving students’ correlational reasoning. AIP Conf Proc. 2021;2330(July).