Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
The purpose of this research is to analyze the reading teaching materials available to elementary students in Bengkulu province. The research methods applied are quantitative descriptive. Data collection with survey techniques. Data analysis Results: 1. All available Indonesian reading material textbooks, according to the perception of the user's teacher, the quality is relatively high. 2. The weakness of the textbook are: a. The theme is presented less according to The characteristics of elementary school students in Bengkulu province. b. The presented material does not contain a student environment. c. The presented material is not student-centered. d. The material does not stimulate students to actively study independently. e. The concepts in these textbooks are lack in sequence.
Rincian Artikel
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Gum Gumono
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
- Council on Economic Development. (2011). “High Literacy” and Language Art Curriculum. School Improvement in Maryland. Mariland: (CED). “High Literacy” and Language Art Curriculum. School Improvement in Maryland. (online). (http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ good_instruction/projectbetter/elangarts/ela-64-66.html) diakses pada tanggal 24 Desember 2011. Diambil kembali dari http://www.mdk12.org/practices/good_instruction/projectbetter/elangarts/ela-64-66.html.
- Graves, D. (2011). Emergent Reading and Writing Connection. School Improvement in Maryland. Diambil kembali dari http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ good_ instruction/projectbetter/ elangarts/ela-97-99.html.
- Pinnell, G. S., & Matlin, M. L. (1990). Teachers and Research Language Learning in the Classroom. Newark: Intl Literacy Assn.
- Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and Learning to Think. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Salinger, T. (2001). Literate Environment. School Improvement in Maryland. . Diambil kembali dari Council on Economic Development (CED): http://www.mdk12.org/practices/good_instruction/projectb etter/elangarts/ela-62-63.html
- Suparno, Kurniawan, K., & Widaryanto, B. (2016). Proses Belajar Mengajar Mata Peljaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kemendiknas.
- Suryaman, M., & Kusmana, S. (2004, 05 17). Mutu Buku Pelajaran Sekolah. Pikiran-rakyat.com, hal. 8.
- Trianto, A. (Juli 1998,). Kajian Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia di SD. Jurnal Penelitian UNIB, IV(12), 96-100.
Referensi
Council on Economic Development. (2011). “High Literacy” and Language Art Curriculum. School Improvement in Maryland. Mariland: (CED). “High Literacy” and Language Art Curriculum. School Improvement in Maryland. (online). (http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ good_instruction/projectbetter/elangarts/ela-64-66.html) diakses pada tanggal 24 Desember 2011. Diambil kembali dari http://www.mdk12.org/practices/good_instruction/projectbetter/elangarts/ela-64-66.html.
Graves, D. (2011). Emergent Reading and Writing Connection. School Improvement in Maryland. Diambil kembali dari http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ good_ instruction/projectbetter/ elangarts/ela-97-99.html.
Pinnell, G. S., & Matlin, M. L. (1990). Teachers and Research Language Learning in the Classroom. Newark: Intl Literacy Assn.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and Learning to Think. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Salinger, T. (2001). Literate Environment. School Improvement in Maryland. . Diambil kembali dari Council on Economic Development (CED): http://www.mdk12.org/practices/good_instruction/projectb etter/elangarts/ela-62-63.html
Suparno, Kurniawan, K., & Widaryanto, B. (2016). Proses Belajar Mengajar Mata Peljaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kemendiknas.
Suryaman, M., & Kusmana, S. (2004, 05 17). Mutu Buku Pelajaran Sekolah. Pikiran-rakyat.com, hal. 8.
Trianto, A. (Juli 1998,). Kajian Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia di SD. Jurnal Penelitian UNIB, IV(12), 96-100.