Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 16, 2023
Accepted
May 13, 2023
Published
May 28, 2023
Download
Dalifa (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 445 Download : 678

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

STEM is an approach that combines four scientific disciplines namely, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics which collaborate in helping students to collect, analyze and solve problems be able to understand the relationship between a problem and other problems in one learning process. This study aims to analyze the Mathematics textbooks of fifth grade Elementary School Students in terms of the Elements of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this study was Mathematics textbook fifth grade 2013 curriculum. The results showed that in each material at KD 3.5 and 3.6 in terms of the STEM approach were (1) for elements of science (Science) emergence the indicator of 50% in KD 3.5 is 15. while in KD 3.6 there is no occurrence. (2) for Technology elements, the occurrence of 75% indicator in KD 3.5 is 31. Meanwhile, in KD 3.6, the occurrence of 50% indicator in KD 3.5 is 6. (3) for Engineering elements, the occurrence of indicator is 80% in KD 3.5 79. Meanwhile, in KD 3.6 the occurrence of 80% indicator in KD 3.6 was 34. (4) for Mathematics elements, the occurrence of 100% indicator in KD 3.5 was 183. Meanwhile in KD 3.6 the occurrence of 100% indicator in KD 3.6 was 28.

Keywords

curriculum 2013 mathematics textbooks STEM

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Dalifa, Neza Agusdianita, Ike Kurniawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Dalifa, Agusdianita, N., & Kurniawati, I. (2023). Analisis Buku Matematika Siswa Kelas V SD Ditinjau dari Unsur Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 16(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.16.1.30-39
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agusdianita N., & Asmahasanah, S. (2020). Penyusunan perangkat model quantum teaching dalam pembelajaran Matematika menggunakan RME untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar, kreativitas, dan karakter siswa SD. Attadib Journal Of Elementary Education, 4(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.32507/attadib.v4i1.633
  2. Agusdianita, N., Karjiyati, V., & Kustianti, S., K. (2021). Pelatihan penerapan model realistic mathematics education berbasis etnomatematika Tabut terhadap kemampuan literasi matematika siswa kelas IV SDN 67 Kota Bengkulu. Martabe Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat. 4(1), 63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jpm.v4i1.63-72
  3. Agusdianita, N., Karjiyati, V., & Sufiyandi. (2020). The use of ethnomathematics learning devices based on realistic mathematics education models on mathematics literacy mastery [Conference session]. The International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210227.054
  4. Agusdianita, N., Widada, W., Afriani, N., H., Herawati, H., Herawaty, D., & Nugroh, K., U., Z. (2021). The exploration of the elementary geometry concepts based on Tabot culture in Bengkulu. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1731 (2021) 012054. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012054
  5. Abidin, dkk., (2018), Pembelajaran literasi: strategi meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika, sains, membaca, dan menulis. Bumi Aksara.
  6. Arsanti, M. (2018). Pengembangan bahan ajar mata kuliah penulisan kreatif bermuatan nilai-nilai pendidikan karakter religius bagi mahasiswa prodi PBSI, FKIP, UNISSULA. Journal Kredo, 1(2), 71-90
  7. Fernandes, M. (2018), Enhancement results learning troubleshooting using realistic mathematics education approach in elementary school. International Journal of Education Dynamics, 1(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijeds.v1i1.18
  8. Hendriana & Soemarmo (2014), Hard skill dan soft skills matematik siswa. Rafika Aditama.
  9. Karso, dkk., (2011), Pendidikan Matematika 1. Universitas Terbuka
  10. Kurniawati, I., Raharjo, T. J., & Khumaedi, K. (2021). Mathematical problem solving ability on problem based learning assisted by geogebra in primary school. Educational Management Journal, 10(1), 110–118.
  11. Permendikbud Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah
  12. Prastowo, A. (2016). Panduan kreatif bahan ajar inovatif. DIVA press.
  13. Sa’adah & Umiyatus, S., (2018). Analisis kesesuaian antara buku teks siswa tematik terpadu kelas v sd/mi tema sehat itu penting terbitan kementrian pendidikan dan kebudayaan dengan kurikulum 2013 (studi di SDN Cipocok Jaya 1 Kota Serang) [Undergraduate thesis, Universtas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin. https://repository.uinbanten.ac.id/1701/
  14. Susanah (2018). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika (modul 7). Universitas Terbuka.
  15. Wardhani, dkk., (2011), Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar Matematika SMP:Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
  16. Wijaya, A., (2012), Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Suatu Alternatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika. Graha Ilmu.
  17. Winarni, E.W., (2018), Penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif. Bumi Aksara
  18. Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi sains dalam pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2).