Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 10, 2024
Accepted
May 30, 2025
Published
May 30, 2025
Download
I Ketut Manik Asta Jaya (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to examine the level of ChatGPT application usage among university students in digital learning era. This study adopts a quantitative research method, utilizing a questionnaire distributed through Google Forms. The questionnaire consists of closed-ended questions using a Likert sccale with 4 options: Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Disagree (D), and Strongly Disagree (SD). The questionnaire comprises 6 indicators, elaborated into 30 statement items. The results of the Validity Test show that the overall calculated r value is greater than the r-table value, at a significance level of 5%. The Reliability Test results indicate that the coefficient alpha reliability (Cronbach Alpha) in each indicator is greater than 0.5, indicating that the research instrument is reliable. This study involved 60 respondents, who are students from the Department of Primary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Dharma Acarya, State Hindu University of I Gussti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar. The research findings show the average percentage across all indicators, revealing that 25.33% of respondents strongly agree, while 45% agree with the use of ChatGPT in lectures. Additionally, an average of 27.83% of respondents disagree with the use of ChatGPT in lectures, and 1.83% strongly disagree. It can be concluded that 70.33% of respondents support the implementation of ChatGPT in the learning process in the digital era.

Keywords

ChatGPT Learning Digital

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 I Ketut Manik Asta Jaya Manik, Ni Nyoman Suastini Suastini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Jaya, I. K. M. A., & Suastini, N. N. (2025). Tingkat Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Pembelajaran di Era Digital pada Mahasiswa PGSD . Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 18(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.18.1.21-28
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(42). https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
  2. Budiastuti, D. D. (2018). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Penelitian. Mitra Wacana.
  3. Fauziyati, W. R. (2023). Dampak penggunaan artificial intelligence (ai) dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 6(4), 2180–2187. https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jrpp/article/view/21623
  4. Hardani. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Pustaka Ilmu Group.
  5. Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection. Arxiv, 1–13. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04335
  6. Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(16), 1–28. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4
  7. Lubis, R. K., Zein, A., & Salsabiela, I. (2024). Hubungan Empiris Chat GPT Pada Pembelajaran Mahasiaswa Bisnis Digital Di STMIK Pelita Nusantara Medan. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 5(3), 900–904.
  8. Mairisiska, T., & Qardarlah, N. (2023). PERSEPSI MAHASISWA FTIK IAIN KERINCI TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN CHATGPT UNTUK MENDUKUNG PEMBELAJARAN DI ERA DIGITAL. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, 13(2), 107–124. https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_tp/article/view/2653/1309
  9. Marlin, K., & Tantrisna, E. (2023). Manfaat dan Tantangan Penggunaan Artificial Intelligences (AI) Chat GPT Terhadap Proses Pendidikan Etika dan Kompetensi Mahasiswa Di Perguruan Tinggi. Innovative Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6). http://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/7119
  10. McGee, R. W. (2023). Is Chat Gpt Biased Against Conservatives? An Empirical Study. An Empirical Study, 1–19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4359405
  11. Muri Yusuf. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penlitian Gabungan. PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.
  12. Purwanto. (2018). Penyusunan Instrumen Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas untuk Penelitian Ekonomi Syariah. StaiaPress.
  13. Ramadhan, F. K., Faris, M. I., Wahyudi, I., & Sulaeman, M. K. (2023). Pemanfaatan ChatGPT dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Flash Elektro, 9(1). http://www.jurnal.pnk.ac.id/index.php/flash/article/view/1069
  14. Retnawati. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.
  15. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Alfabeta.
  16. Suharmawan, W. (2023). Pemanfaatan Chat GPT dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Education Journal, 7(2), 158–166. https://jurnal.unipar.ac.id/index.php/ej/article/view/1248
  17. Sun, D. (2023). Urgent Need for Ethical Policies to Prevent the Proliferation of AI‑Generated Texts in Scientific Papers. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 16(5), 941–943. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-023-03046-9
  18. Wibowo, T. U. S. H., Akbar, F., Ilham, S. R., & Fauzan, M. S. (2023). Tantangan dan Peluang Penggunaan Aplikasi Chat GPT Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Dimensi 5.0. Jurnal Petisi, 4(2). https://unimuda.e-journal.id/jurnalteknologiinformasi/article/view/4226