Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the impact of implementing the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) approach on enhancing fifth-grade students' understanding of plane figure perimeter concepts at SD Muhammadiyah 4 Malang. Employing a quantitative method with a pretest-posttest design without a control group, data were collected through written tests and project-based evaluations using an assessment rubric. The findings revealed a significant improvement in the students’ average posttest score compared to the pretest score, indicating that the PjBL approach effectively increased conceptual understanding (p < 0.05). Item analysis showed that the difficulty index fell within the moderate category (0.5–0.8), with most items demonstrating good discrimination power (above 0.3). The instrument's reliability, indicated by Cronbach’s Alpha, was 0.903, reflecting excellent internal consistency. Project assessment results recorded an average score of 91.2, categorized as "Very Good," which shows that students were able to creatively and collaboratively apply the perimeter concept to real-life contexts. These outcomes demonstrate that PjBL effectively promotes students' conceptual understanding while simultaneously supporting the development of essential 21st-century skills.

Keywords

project-based learning conceptual understanding plane figure perimeter learning evaluation mathematics education project-based learning conceptual understanding plane figure perimeter learning evaluation mathematics education

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahayuningsih, S., & Pantiwati, Y. (2025). Efektivitas Project-Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Bangun Datar 2D Matematika di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 18(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.18.2.95-104

References

  1. (2021). The development of students’ computational thinking practices in elementary- and middle-school classes using the learning game, Zoombinis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106587
  2. Bakmohammadi, P., & Noorzai, E. (2020). Optimization of the design of the primary school classrooms in terms of energy and daylight performance considering occupants’ thermal and visual comfort. Energy Reports, 6, 1590–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.008
  3. Coelho, V. A., Romão, A. M., Silva, P. R., & Saldanha, S. (2021). A nationwide analysis of the effectiveness of a Social and Emotional Learning program in Portugal: Focus on the role of developers’ involvement. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 26(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.04.001
  4. Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., Belcher, M., McGowan, W., Hennessey, M., & Shah, M. (2018). The concept of an agile curriculum as applied to a middle school mathematics digital learning system (DLS). International Journal of Educational Research, 92(April), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.017
  5. Connor, C. M. D., Adams, A., Zargar, E., Wood, T. S., Hernandez, B. E., & Vandell, D. L. (2020). Observing individual children in early childhood classrooms using Optimizing Learning Opportunities for Students (OLOS): A feasibility study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.10.001
  6. Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A. C. K., Kim, E., & Xie, C. (2018). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review, 25(November 2017), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001
  7. Davidson, L. A., Crowder, M. K., Gordon, R. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Brown, R. D., & Hayes, B. I. (2018). A continuous improvement approach to social and emotional competency measurement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.03.002
  8. Gray, D. L. L., McElveen, T. L., Green, B. P., & Bryant, L. H. (2020). Engaging Black and Latinx students through communal learning opportunities: A relevance intervention for middle schoolers in STEM elective classrooms. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60(December 2019), 101833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101833
  9. Hemelt, S. W., & Lenard, M. A. (2020). Math acceleration in elementary school: Access and effects on student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 74(September 2018), 101921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101921
  10. Holdway, J., & Hitchcock, C. H. (2018). Exploring ideological becoming in professional development for teachers of multilingual learners: Perspectives on translanguaging in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.015
  11. Meyers, D. C., Domitrovich, C. E., Dissi, R., Trejo, J., & Greenberg, M. T. (2019). Supporting systemic social and emotional learning with a schoolwide implementation model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 73(April 2018), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.11.005
  12. Naparan, G. B., & Alinsug, V. G. (2021). Classroom strategies of multigrade teachers. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3(1), 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100109
  13. Nyoni, C. N., & Botma, Y. (2019). Implementing a competency-based midwifery programme in Lesotho: A gap analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 34(October 2018), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.005
  14. Pendidikan, M., Kebudayaan, D. A. N., & Indonesia, R. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 03 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. 47.
  15. Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan P. T. R. I. N. 20 T. 2019. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2019. KEMenteri AnRiset, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2019, 69(1496), 1–13.
  16. Sauve, J. A., & Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2019). Creating caring classroom and school communities: Lessons learned from social and emotional learning programs and practices. In Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions: Working with Disengaged Students. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00019-X
  17. Schlegel, R. J., Chu, S. L., Chen, K., Deuermeyer, E., Christy, A. G., & Quek, F. (2019). Making in the classroom: Longitudinal evidence of increases in self-efficacy and STEM possible selves over time. Computers and Education, 142(July), 103637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103637
  18. Shin, D. J. D., Lee, M., Ha, J. E., Park, J. H., Ahn, H. S., Son, E., Chung, Y., & Bong, M. (2019). Science for all: Boosting the science motivation of elementary school students with utility value intervention. Learning and Instruction, 60(December 2018), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.003
  19. Tabone, J. K., Rishel, C. W., Hartnett, H. P., & Szafran, K. F. (2020). Examining the effectiveness of early intervention to create trauma-informed school environments. Children and Youth Services Review, 113(December 2019), 104998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104998