Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 4, 2025
Accepted
November 30, 2025
Published
May 30, 2025
Download
Gancar Pramistri Ambawono (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The assessment of student learning outcomes in Visual Arts at the elementary school level often faces challenges such as low validity and reliability of assessment instruments, as well as teachers' limited ability to develop holistic project assessment rubrics. These issues affect the interpretation of students' learning outcomes. This study aims to develop a summative assessment instrument comprising multiple-choice questions, essay questions, and a project assessment rubric that is valid, reliable, and practical. The research employed a Research and Development (Borg & Gall, 1983) model involving needs analysis, design, validation, testing, and revision stages. The results showed item validity ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 and a reliability coefficient of 0.78, indicating good internal consistency. The mean combined score for multiple-choice and essay questions was 14.46, exceeding the "Excellent" threshold (≥13), indicating that students had achieved the expected competencies. The developed project assessment rubric also demonstrated good validation and was practical to use. Therefore, this instrument can serve as a solution to improve the quality of assessment in elementary schools, providing more holistic assessment and supporting meaningful learning.

Keywords

assessment instrument visual arts project based learning summative assessment assessment instrument visual arts project based learning summative assessment

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Gancar Pramistri Ambawono, Yuni Pantiwati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Pramistri Ambawono, G., & Pantiwati, Y. (2025). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sumatif Berbasis Project-Based Learning dalam Pembelajaran Seni Rupa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 18(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.18.2.105-116
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Asbell-Clarke, J., Rowe, E., Almeda, V., Edwards, T., Bardar, E., Gasca, S., Baker, R. S., & Scruggs, R. (2021). The development of students’ computational thinking practices in elementary- and middle-school classes using the learning game, Zoombinis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106587
  2. Bakmohammadi, P., & Noorzai, E. (2020). Optimization of the design of the primary school classrooms in terms of energy and daylight performance considering occupants’ thermal and visual comfort. Energy Reports, 6, 1590–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.008
  3. Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in students’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100750
  4. Castaldi, P., & Mimmo, N. (2019). An experience of project based learning in aerospace engineering. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(12), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.290
  5. Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 26). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
  6. Chu, S. K. W., Li, X., & Mok, S. (2021). UPCC: A model of plagiarism-free inquiry project-based learning. Library and Information Science Research, 43(1), 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101073
  7. Coelho, V. A., Romão, A. M., Silva, P. R., & Saldanha, S. (2021). A nationwide analysis of the effectiveness of a Social and Emotional Learning program in Portugal: Focus on the role of developers’ involvement. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 26(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.04.001
  8. Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., Belcher, M., McGowan, W., Hennessey, M., & Shah, M. (2018). The concept of an agile curriculum as applied to a middle school mathematics digital learning system (DLS). International Journal of Educational Research, 92(April), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.017
  9. Connor, C. M. D., Adams, A., Zargar, E., Wood, T. S., Hernandez, B. E., & Vandell, D. L. (2020). Observing individual children in early childhood classrooms using Optimizing Learning Opportunities for Students (OLOS): A feasibility study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.10.001
  10. Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A. C. K., Kim, E., & Xie, C. (2018). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review, 25(November 2017), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001
  11. Davidson, L. A., Crowder, M. K., Gordon, R. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Brown, R. D., & Hayes, B. I. (2018). A continuous improvement approach to social and emotional competency measurement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.03.002
  12. Eltanahy, M., Forawi, S., & Mansour, N. (2020). Incorporating Entrepreneurial Practices into STEM Education: Development of Interdisciplinary E-STEM Model in High School in the United Arab Emirates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(July), 100697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100697
  13. Gray, D. L. L., McElveen, T. L., Green, B. P., & Bryant, L. H. (2020). Engaging Black and Latinx students through communal learning opportunities: A relevance intervention for middle schoolers in STEM elective classrooms. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60(December 2019), 101833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101833
  14. Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(November 2019), 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
  15. Mäkiö-Marusik, E., Colombo, A. W., Mäkiö, J., & Pechmann, A. (2019). Concept and case study for teaching and learning industrial digitalization. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.016
  16. Margallo, M., Dominguez-Ramos, A., & Aldaco, R. (2019). Incorporating life cycle assessment and ecodesign tools for green chemical engineering: A case study of competences and learning outcomes assessment. Education for Chemical Engineers, 26, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.08.002
  17. Meyers, D. C., Domitrovich, C. E., Dissi, R., Trejo, J., & Greenberg, M. T. (2019). Supporting systemic social and emotional learning with a schoolwide implementation model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 73(April 2018), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.11.005
  18. Nyoni, C. N., & Botma, Y. (2019). Implementing a competency-based midwifery programme in Lesotho: A gap analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 34(October 2018), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.005
  19. Pendidikan, M., Kebudayaan, D. A. N., & Indonesia, R. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 03 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. 47.
  20. Sauve, J. A., & Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2019). Creating caring classroom and school communities: Lessons learned from social and emotional learning programs and practices. In Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions: Working with Disengaged Students. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00019-X
  21. Schlegel, R. J., Chu, S. L., Chen, K., Deuermeyer, E., Christy, A. G., & Quek, F. (2019). Making in the classroom: Longitudinal evidence of increases in self-efficacy and STEM possible selves over time. Computers and Education, 142(July), 103637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103637
  22. Shin, D. J. D., Lee, M., Ha, J. E., Park, J. H., Ahn, H. S., Son, E., Chung, Y., & Bong, M. (2019). Science for all: Boosting the science motivation of elementary school students with utility value intervention. Learning and Instruction, 60(December 2018), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.003
  23. Tabone, J. K., Rishel, C. W., Hartnett, H. P., & Szafran, K. F. (2020). Examining the effectiveness of early intervention to create trauma-informed school environments. Children and Youth Services Review, 113(December 2019), 104998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104998
  24. Zhou, Q. (2021). Development of creative thinking skills through aesthetic creativity in middle school educational music course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40(February), 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100825