Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This study aims to determine whether the use of Napier Bone Exam can improve mathematics learning outcomes in multiplication counting operations. The method in this study is a classroom action research with a collaborative form involving researchers who are also as principals, and peers of teachers.This research was conducted in class V at State SDN 12 Tebat Karai District in Kepahiang in the school year 2015/2016 with the number of students 20 people. The focus of this research is the result of mathematics learning on multiplication counting and the effectiveness of napier bone wear. Action Research This class uses two cycles. Each cycle consists of four steps: planning, action, observation and reflection.The results showed an increase, this is evidenced by the results obtained in cycle I and cycle II with SK / KD as well as different indicators in the category of very good. By looking at the results of this study can be concluded that this research is able to answer the purpose of research that the use of napier bone skeleton can improve the results of mathematics learning on the multiplication counts class V students in SDN 12 TebatKaraiKepahiang Regency 2015/2016. Other data relating to research and student work as attached. Finally, researchers suggest to all teachers to be creative in presenting lessons, especially in using props and media that are interesting and varied so that it can bring students in a fun learning process and thorough completion of student learning outcomes can be achieved.
Rincian Artikel
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Lelawarna Lelawarna

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
- Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2001. Standar Kompetensi Dasar Guru. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidkan Nasional.
- Departemen Penddikan Nasional. 2003. Undang-undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidkan Nasional. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidkan Nasional
- Departemen Penddikan Nasional. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidkan Nasional
- Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2002. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Handoko, T. (2006). Terampil Matematika V. Jakarta:Yudistira
- Iruliana. (2010). Batang Napier. Blogspot.com
- Kurikulum SD Negeri 12 Tebt Karai (2015)
- Margono. (1998). Metodologi penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang: Rineka cipta.
- Sagala. S (2005 ) Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran Bandung: CV Alfabeta
- Mulyani, S. (2001). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Depdikbud Dirjen Dikti. Proyek Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar.Jakarta.
- Sudjana, N. dan Suwariyah, W. (1996). Model-Model Mengajar CBSA. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
- Ngalim, P. 1999. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
- Slameto 2003. Proses Belajar Mengajar Dalam Sistem Kredit. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.
- Arikunto, S. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Suherman, E, dan Putra, U. S W.(1999). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Matematika. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Referensi
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2001. Standar Kompetensi Dasar Guru. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidkan Nasional.
Departemen Penddikan Nasional. 2003. Undang-undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidkan Nasional. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidkan Nasional
Departemen Penddikan Nasional. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidkan Nasional
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2002. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Handoko, T. (2006). Terampil Matematika V. Jakarta:Yudistira
Iruliana. (2010). Batang Napier. Blogspot.com
Kurikulum SD Negeri 12 Tebt Karai (2015)
Margono. (1998). Metodologi penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang: Rineka cipta.
Sagala. S (2005 ) Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran Bandung: CV Alfabeta
Mulyani, S. (2001). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Depdikbud Dirjen Dikti. Proyek Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar.Jakarta.
Sudjana, N. dan Suwariyah, W. (1996). Model-Model Mengajar CBSA. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Ngalim, P. 1999. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Slameto 2003. Proses Belajar Mengajar Dalam Sistem Kredit. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.
Arikunto, S. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suherman, E, dan Putra, U. S W.(1999). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Matematika. Jakarta: Depdikbud.