Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was conducted to obtain an overview of service quality at Bengkulu University by linking it to various aspects as implications of the implementation of quality services. The aim of this research is to analyze the influence of service quality, perceived value, and institutional image on student satisfaction at Bengkulu University. The population of this research is Bengkulu University students from various faculties who have studied for at least 2 semesters (third semester and above). The sampling method that collects data is purposive. The sample size was 268 respondents. The research results found that: 1) Service quality has a positive and significant influence on student satisfaction at Bengkulu University. This means that the better the quality of educational services, the better the satisfaction of Bengkulu University students. 2). Perceived value has a positive influence on student satisfaction at Bengkulu University. This means that if the perceived value increases, student satisfaction will increase. 3). The image of the institution has a positive effect on student satisfaction at Bengkulu University. This means that improving the image of the institution will have an impact on increasing student satisfaction at Bengkulu University. 4). Service quality, perceived value, and institutional image have a positive influence on Bengkulu University student satisfaction.

Keywords

Customer Satisfaction Service Quality Perceived Value Institution Image.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saputra, K., Hadi, E. D., & Anggarawati, S. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Service Quality, Perceived Value Dan Institution Image Terhadap kepuasan Mahasiswa Universitas Bengkulu. Student Journal of Business and Management, 6(2). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/sjbm/article/view/33192

References

  1. Aaker, D. A. (2013). Strategi Manajemen Pemasaran (8th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  2. Alida Palilati, 2007, Pengaruh Nilai Pelanggan, Kepuasan terhadap Loyalitas Nasabah Tabungan Perbankan di Sulawesi Selatan, Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), Vol. 32 No. 2.
  3. Alves, H. 2010. The Measurement of Perceived Value in Higher Education: A Unidimensional Approach.
  4. The Service Industries Journal, 31, 1943-1960.
  5. Ambartiasari, Geta; A. Rahman Lubi; Syafruddin Chan (2017), Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan, Kepercayaan Dan Fasilitas Kampus Terhadap Kepuasan Dan Dampaknya Kepada Loyalitas Mahasiswa Politeknik Indonesia Venezuela (POLIVEN), Jurnal Manajemen dan Inovasi, Vol. 8, No. 3, Oktober 2017: 12-23 12
  6. Amalia, A. N. dan Supriyadi, S., 2021, Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Akademik dan Sidang Skripsi Secara Daring Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa di Masa Pandemi Covid19. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan MH Thamrin, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37012/jipmht.v5i1.528
  7. Anonim, Laporan Tahunan Universitas Bengkulu Tahun 2022, Universitas Bengkulu.
  8. Azoury, Nehme M; Lindos E. Daou, dan Charbel M. El Khoury, 2013, University Image and its Relationship to Student Satisfaction: Case of the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Lebanon, Journal of Executive Education, Vol. 12, 2013
  9. Bennett, R. & Ali-Choudhury, R. (2009). Prospective students’ perceptions of university brands: an empirical study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19 (1), 85-107.
  10. Barnes, J. G. 2003. Secret of Customer Relationship Management (Rahasia Manajemen Hubungan Pelanggan). Yogyakarta: Andi
  11. Carman, J.M, 1990, Consumer Perception of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL d imension, Journal of Ritail, 66; 33-55
  12. Doyle, P. (1989). Building successful brands: the strategic options. Journal of Marketing Management, 3 (1), 77-95.
  13. Fan, Y. (2005). Ethical branding and corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(4), 341–350
  14. Fares, D., Achour, M., & Kachkar, O. (2013). The impact of service quality, student satisfaction, and university reputation on student loyalty: a case study of international students in IIUM, Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 5(12), 584–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.22610/imbr. v5i12.1091
  15. Firmansyah, M. A. (2019). Pemasaran Produk dan Merek: Planning dan Strategy. Penerbit Qiara Media. Ghozali, Imam, 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : Badan Penerbit
  16. Universitas Diponegoro. BPFE.
  17. Ginsberg, M. B. (2011). Understanding educational reforms in global context: Economy, ideology and the state. New York, NY: Garland.
  18. Halai, N. (2013), “Quality of private universities in Pakistan: an analysis of higher education commission rankings 2012”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 27 No.7,pp.775-786.
  19. Hassan, Sallaudin, and Mohd Farid Shamsudin. 2019. “Measuring the Effect of Service quality and Corporate Image on Student Satisfaction and Loyalty in Higher Learning Institutes of Technical and Vocational Education and Training.” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 8(5): 533–38
  20. Ismail, Azman., Abdullah, Muhammad Mahdi., dan Parasuraman, Balakrishnan. 2009. Effect of Service Quality and Perceive Value on Customer Satisfaction. International Journal of Management Perspectives, Vol. 1, Issue 3, pp 29-44.
  21. Jiewanto, A., Laurens, C., & Nelloh, L. (2012). Influence of service quality, university image, and student satisfaction toward WOM intention: a case study on Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 16–23. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.155
  22. Kotler, P and Keller, KL. (2012). Marketing Management. 12rd. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. Kotler, P and Keller, KL. (2009). Marketing Management. 12rd. New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. Kotler, Philip dan Gary Armstrong. 2008. Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran. Edisi 12. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  23. Leblanc, G. & Nguyen, N. 1999. Listening to the Customer's Voice: Examining Perceived Service Value among Business College Students. The International Journal of Educational Management, 13, 187-187-198.
  24. Maxima Ari Saktiono, 2020, Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Akademik Pada Program Diploma Pelayaran Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya, Jurnal Statistika Vol. 13, No. 2,(2020), Hal. 20-24
  25. Moogan, Y., Baron, S., & Bainbridge, S. (2001). Timings and trade-offs in the marketing of higher education courses: A conjoint approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(3), 179–187
  26. Ng, Irene CL, and Jeannie Forbes. 2009, "Education as service: The understanding of university experience through the service logic." Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 19, no. 1
  27. (2009): 38-64
  28. Nurmalasari, 2014, Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Citra Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Pada Akademi Kebidanan Aisyiyah Pontianak, Jurnal Khatulistiwa Informatika, Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2014
  29. O’Neill, M.A. and Palmer,A. (2004), “Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol.12No.1,pp.39-52.
  30. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, A and Berry,L. (1985), “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 41-50.
  31. Prasetya Bambang dan Lina Miftahul Jannah. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Teori dan Aplikasi.
  32. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada
  33. Prindle, Ron, Ph.D., 2011, A Public Relations Role in Brand Messaging, International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 18; October 2011 32
  34. Rahareng, V. J., & Relawan, N. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Akademik Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Administrasi Bisnis Universitas Telkom). AdBispreneur: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(2).
  35. Rasheed Firend dan Abadi Masoumeh, 2014, Impact of service quality, Trust and Perceived value on customer loyalty in Malaysia Service industries, Social and Behavioral Science 164, 298-304
  36. Freddy, Rangkuti. 2006. Teknik Mengukur dan Strategi Meningkatkan Kepuasan Pelanggan. Jakarta : Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  37. Randheer, Kokku, 2015, Service Quality Performance Scale in Higher Education: Culture as a New Dimension, International Business Research; Vol. 8, No. 3; 2015 ISSN 1913-9004 E-ISSN 1913-9012
  38. Ratnasari, I. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan dan Citra Institusi Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa yang Berdampak pada Word of Mouth (Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang). Value: Journal of Management and Business, 1(1).
  39. Seftiani. 2017. Pengaruh Citra Perusahaan dan Atribut Produk terhadap Keputusan Menabung Nasabah dalam Prespektif Ekonomi Islam (Studi Pada Nasabah Bank Syariah Mandiri KC Teluk Betung Bandar Lampung).
  40. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta
  41. Susetyo Dwinanto Priyo, Eka Pranajaya, Teddy Setiawan, dan Asep Suryana, 2022, Kualitas Pelayanan Akademik dan Citra Institusi sebagai Determinan Kepuasan Mahasiswa, Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol.1, No.4
  42. Swan, S., Gomes, P., Polotskaia, A., Jankowska, A. (2015). The relationship between student health and academic performance: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology International Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1-14.
  43. Szekeres, J. (2010). Sustaining student numbers in the competitive marketplace. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32 (5), 429-439.
  44. Tjiptono, Fandy. 2014. Strategi Pemasaran. Edisi 4. Jakarta: ANDI
  45. Wijaya Evelyn, Achmad Tavip dan Junaedib Agus Hocky, 2021, Service Quality, Institutional Image and Satisfaction: Can Drivers Student Loyalty?, journal Asia-Pacific Management and Business Application, 9, 3 (2021)
  46. Willkins, S. and Balakrishnan M.S., 2013. Assesing Student Satisfaction in Transnational Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Management, 27 (2), pp. 143-156
  47. Wulandari, D. A., & Suryani, T. (2017). Service Quality and the Impact on Student’S Satisfaction Loyalty To Master of Management Program in Surabaya. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 17(1), 7.
  48. Zeithaml, V. A. 1990. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-2