Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

The e-learning  lecture system is an important innovation in the world of education, allowing students to study remotely via the internet. The positive impact of e-learning   learning is that students become more responsible and can value their time. Intention to Reuse is a person's Intention to Reuse a system that has been implemented in a higher education environment. This research aims to determine the influence of perceived usefulness, perceived convenience, subjective norms and IT system quality on Intention to Reuse. This research is a type of descriptive research with a quantitative approach (survey). The type of data used is primary data obtained through distributing questionnaires. The respondents of this research were 195 GENBI students at UNIB, UIN, UMB, and IAIN Curup. The data analysis technique used multiple linear regression analysis with the help of the SPSS 25 application.  The research results are (1). Perception of usefulness has a positive and significant effect on Intention to Reuse. This perception of usefulness impacts students' Intention to Reuse. (2). Perception of convenience has no effect on Intention to Reuse, this perception of ease has no impact on Intention to Reuse. (3) Subjective Norms has a positive and significant effect on Intention to Reuse. (4) Perception of IT quality has a positive and significant effect on Intention to Reuse. This means that the quality of the IT system impacts students' Intention to Reuse. Suggestions for future research include adding samples other than Genbi students and adding other variables, such as organizational culture and perceptions of trust

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Williansyah, Y., Abdillah, W., & Fachruzzaman, F. (2024). Intention to Reuse E-Learning among GENBI Students. Student Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 23–46. Diambil dari https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/sjbm/article/view/36265

Referensi

  1. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  2. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.
  3. Al-maroof, R. A. S., & Al-emran, M. (2018). Students acceptance of google classroom: An exploratory study using PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(06), 112–123.
  4. Al-Swidi, A., Huque, S. M. R., Hafeez, M. H., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2014). The role of subjective norms in theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food Aconsumption. British Food Journal, 116(10), 1561-1580.
  5. Al-Swidi, A., Mohammed Rafiul Huque, S., Haroon Hafeez, M., & Noor Mohd Shariff, M. (2014). The role of subjective norms in theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food consumption. British food journal, 116(10), 1561-1580.
  6. Aristian, M., Setyohadi, D., & Sinaga, B. L. (2016). Faktor yang mempengaruhi niat penggunaan e-learning oleh mahasiswa pada Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. In Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (pp. 18-19).
  7. Barhoumi, C. (2016). User acceptance of the eInformation service as information resource: A new extension of the technology acceptance model. New Library World, 117(9/10), 626-643.
  8. Castaneda, JA, Munoz-Leiva, F., & Luque, T. (2007). Web acceptance model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience. Information and Management, 44(4), 384–396.
  9. Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019). Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India-An empirical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(7), 1590-1618.
  10. Chi, H., Yeh, H., & Hung, W. C. (2012). The moderating effect of subjective norm on cloud computing users' perceived risk and usage intention. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(6), 95.
  11. Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students’ perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94–116.
  12. Cresswell, T. (2018). Landscape and the obliteration of practice. In Culture and Society (pp. 3-15). Routledge.
  13. Cudjoe, A. G., Anim, P. A., & Nyanyofio, J. G. N. T. (2015). Determinants of mobile banking adoption in the Ghanaian banking industry: a case of access bank Ghana limited. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3(2), 1-19.
  14. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475-487.
  15. DeLone, W. H., & Mclean. E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A Ten-Year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
  16. Dlodlo, N., & Dhurup, M. (2016). An exploratory study of twitter sports CONSUMPTION motives and relationship with future intentions: A perspective from athletes’followers. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 8(1), 1-16.
  17. Efiloglu K, Ö. (2019). Examining an e-learning system through the lens of the information systems success model: Empirical evidence from Italy. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1173-1184.
  18. Gagne, C. L. (2002). The competition‐among‐relations‐in‐nominals theory of conceptual combination: Implications for stimulus class formation and class expansion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(3), 551-565.
  19. Ghozali, I. (2013). Uji Reliabilitas dan Validitas Suatu Konstruk atau Konsep. Universitas Diponegoro.
  20. Jamil, S.H., & Aprilisanda, I.D. (2020). Pengaruh pembelajaran daring terhadap minat belajar mahasiswa pada masa mandemik Covid-19. BAJ: Behavioral Accounting Journal, 3(1), 37-46.
  21. Kurt, O. E. (2019). Examining e-learning system through the lens of the information systems success model: Empirical evidence from Italy. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1173–1184.
  22. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P., (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Information & Management 40(3), 191–204.
  23. Maulana, H. A., & Hamidi, M. (2020). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran daring pada mata kuliah praktik di pendidikan vokasi. Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(2), 224-231.
  24. McGill, T. J., Klobas, J. E., & Hobbs, V. J. (2004). Perceptions, user satisfaction and success: Testing the DeLone and McLean model in the user developed application domain. In Advanced Topics in Information Resources Management, Volume 3 (pp. 87-116). IGI Global.
  25. McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information systems research, 13(3), 296-315.
  26. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage publications.
  27. Napitupulu, F. (2021). The Commodification of “Stay at Home” in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era in Indonesia.
  28. Nurbani, K., & Meiyanti, F. (2019). The impact of system quality and information quality on user satisfaction and user performance. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen dan Ekonomi, 21(2).
  29. Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multidimensional students’ evaluation of learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1285– 1296.
  30. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of service research, 7(3), 213-233.
  31. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H. & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of e-learning banking: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Internet Research, 14 (3), 224-235.
  32. Putra, A. P., & Malini, H. (2022). Pembelajaran dalam Jaringan (Daring) saat dan pasca pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Intersections, 7(1), 39 -46.
  33. Rahayu, A., Sulasti, S., & Dintha, R. (2022). Persepsi kemudahaan menggunakan dan persepsi manfaat menggunakan kembali sistem pembelajaran daring elama pembelajaran. Journal of Business Management Education, 7(2), 48-52.
  34. Sakdiyah, L., Effendi, R., & Kustono, A.S. (2019). Analisis penerimaan penggunaan E-learning dengan pendekatan theory of planned behavior (TPB) pada mahasiswa akuntansi universitas jember. E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 6 (2), 120-126.
  35. Sarwono, J. (2017). Mengenal Prosedur-Prosedur Populer dalam SPSS 23. Elex Media Komputindo.
  36. Shittu, A. T., Basha, K. M., Rah