Main Article Content

Abstract

The fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015. That mechanism only requires small amount of permitted claim, it is 200 million Rupiah in maximum, it also settles claims in a very fast manner, 25 days in maximum. This fast procedural mechanism allocated to settle private dispute is called as “the small claims court”, in which, it is already implemented either in states with the civil law system or the common law system. The research methodology used in this article is juridical-normative and juridical kualitative analyze, to aim the SCC phisophy in Indonesia and the effectivity in enacting this mechanism of small claims court as one of the states that enact the civil judicial system. The results shows that the SCC  in indonesia is an advancement as a means of access to justice, in short it is a simple and inexpensive procedure.  that the fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015 is effectively enacted in civil judicial system in Indonesia. With society needs nowadays, the effort to increasing good services towards justice seeker, it’s inclusive because of the different mechanism of general judicial system under  HIR/RBG, it is not just about time but also with a judge investigation, simple evidentiary, and without legal effort

Keywords

civil procedure law fast procedures civil judicial system small claims court

Article Details

How to Cite
Afriana, A. (2018). DASAR FILOSOFIS DAN INKLUSIVITAS GUGATAN SEDERHANA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PERDATA. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.3.1.1-14

References

  1. Bagir Manan. (2009). Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan, dalam Menegakkan Hukum Suatu Pencarian, Jakarta: Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia.
  2. Eman Suparman. (2012). Arbitrase & Dilema Penegakan Keadilan, Jakarta: PT. Fikahati Aneska.
  3. John Rawls. (1998) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachuset: Harvard University Press.
  4. Man S Sastrawidjaja. (2006) Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.
  5. Ross Craston. (2004) The Rational Study of Law:Social Research and Access To Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Texas Young Lawyers Association and the State Bar of Texas. (2009). How to Sue in Small Claims Court, 5th Edition, Texas.
  7. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  8. Het Herzienne Indonesisch Reglement (HIR atau Reglemen Indonesia yang diperbaharui: Stb. 1848 no.16, Stb. 1941 no. 44) untuk wilayah Jawa dan Madura.
  9. Rechtsreglement Buitengewesten (RBg)
  10. Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
  11. Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
  12. Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
  13. PerMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan
  14. SEMA No. 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Penyelesaian Perkara di Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tinggi.
  15. Jurnal:
  16. Candra Irawan, Problematika Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 tahun 2008 Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER, 2015, Vol 1 No. 2.
  17. Efa Laela Fakhriah, Mekanisme Small Claims Court Dalam Mewujudkan Tercapainya Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan, Mimbar Hukum Journal, 2013, Vol 25 No. 2.
  18. Anita Afriana, “Towards Access To Justice: Quick Procedures In Civil Dispute Settlement In Indonesia”, Disampaikan Dalam International Conference Access To Justice, diselenggarakan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang Tanggal 21 November 2015.
  19. Sumber Internet
  20. Singapore Court System http://www.lawsoceety.org
  21. http//www. europa.eu/legislation_summaries
  22. https://www.statecourts.gov.sg/Smallclaims/Pages/GeneralInformation.aspx. (http://www.pembaruanperadilan.net/v2/2014/04/ma-upayakan-inisiasi
  23. (http://www.eodb.ekon.go.id