- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Author Attention
- Frequency of Publishing
- Publication Ethics Statement
- Article Processing Charges (APCs)
Focus and Scope
Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen is an online journal that is published two times a year. It publishes research papers that give rigorous theoretical and practical insight of business and managament. Management Insight aims to provide a forum for the dissemination of theory application and research in all areas of business and management, including but are not limited to:
- Operational Management
- Human Resource Management
- Business Strategy
- Decision Science and Decision-making
- Strategic Negotiation
- Business Risk
- Knowledge Management
- Human Capital Management
- Technology Management
- Entrepreneurship, and
- Others relevant subjects
It is intended for researchers, students, business practitioners, and entrepreneurs to publish their ideas and experiences, and share their knowledge on business and management issues.
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
Peer Review Process
When a manuscript is submitted to Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, it is assessed to see if it meets the criteria for submission. If it does, the editorial team will select potential peer reviewers within the field of research to peer-review the manuscript and make recommendations.
Review process on Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen at least 1 reviewer in a double blind peer review. Pre-review of articles will be conducted to see format of pages, images, tables, citations and reference lists as well as the systematic writing of articles. Checking for plagiarism is done through the Similarity Check application and/Plagiarism Checker.
Every article submitted will be reviewed by peer reviewee.
Some possibilities for receiving articles:
1. Received directly without being repaired.
2. Accepted with repairs by the author.
3. Received an editor repair.
4. Rejected for not fulfilling the requirements.
Reviewers can request a review after the author has revised the article. The decision to accept an article is the authority of the Chief of Editor based on recommendations from the reviewers.
Jurnal ini terbit setiap tahun 2 kali edisi, yaitu edisi April dan edisi Oktober.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Benefits of open access for the author, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Authors retain copyright to their work
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
However, works/articles in this journal as are bound to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Authors who have sent the script and passed the review process, and the results of the review have been submitted by the editor to the author. However, there was no response from the author to correct the text over a period of more than 6 months, so the manuscript was still active in the Managament Insight online system. Because of this, the editor and reviewer have done the work in vain (a waste of energy and time).
the authors will be blacklisted for publication on Managament Insight. We are will be written the full name of the author, email of all authors, and affiliates of the author.
Frequency of Publishing
Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, publishes 2 (two) issue every year and will be published in April and October.
Managament Insight accepts articles at any time, but the editor cannot guarantee that they will be published in the nearest publication.
The article published at Managament Insight is available online and is freely accessible by the full text:
Publication Ethics Statement
Managament Insight has high standards for expected ethical behavior by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. Managament Insight is a peer-reviewed journal, published two times a year by Unit of Research and Publishing Departmenet of Management Universitas Bengkulu. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in Managament Insight is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of Managament Insight takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. Managament Insight committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
The editors of Managament Insight are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of Managament Insight editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions.
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
DUTIES OF REVIEWERS
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Every manuscript submitted to Mimbar Hukum is independently reviewed by at least two reviewers in the form of "double-blind review". Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. In certain cases, the editor may submit an article for review to another, third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary.
DUTIES OF AUTHORS
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
If applicable, authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published works When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Fundamental errors in Published Works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Article Processing Charges (APCs)
Management Insight does not charge for Article Processing Charges (APCs) or Submission Charges
Startting April 2020 this journal charges the following author fees
Article Submission : 0.00 (IDR)
Article Publication: 300.000 (IDR)