Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to determine the forms, scales, and factors of students' politeness in communication to their thesis advisor lecturers via WhatsApp. The research design was descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this research was 54 of 2017 English students' text messages to their thesis advisor lecturers who were selected from classes A, B, and C by using the purposive sampling technique. The data were analyzed based on theory forms of politeness by Kushartanti, scales of politeness by Leech, and factors affecting politeness by Brown & Levinson's theories. From the findings of this study, there are four forms of politeness used by students, namely pronominal sentences, indirect sentences, opening sentences, and word appreciation sentences. The most widely used forms of politeness are opening sentences and appreciation words. Five politeness scales were also found, namely the cost and benefit scale, the optionality scale, the indirectness scale, the authority scale, and the last is social distance scale, where this scale is the most widely used. All politeness data are influenced by relative power and social distance, and there is no size of imposition politeness factor found. There are also two forms of impoliteness in this study, directness and without using the word appreciation and some students are classified as impolite based on the optionality scale. Students use all existing forms of politeness because they use Indonesian politeness forms and Indonesian culture, which considers these forms a sign that sentences in a conversation are considered polite. The form of politeness used by students is influenced by the politeness scale, that is social distance and vice versa. Based on the result, it can be concluded that most of the students have used politeness form when communicating with their lecturers through WhatsApp text messages.

Keywords

politeness forms scales factors of politeness whatsapp

Article Details

How to Cite
Maharani, W. W., Arasuli, A., & Kurniawan, I. (2022). The Forms of Politeness Applied by English Students in Communication to Their Thesis Advisor Lecturers Via WhatsApp. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 6(3), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.3.417-432

References

  1. Alim, J., Pujiati, H., Attas, S. G., & Leiliyanti, E. (2020). Maxims deviation and politeness scale of uang panai mahar film by using Leech’s perspective. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1378–1391. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.996
  2. Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., Johnson, D. M., & Yang, A. W. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587263
  3. Dukha, J. (2020). Politeness strategy Used By Examiner On Thesis Proposal Online Examination Of English Language Education At Iain Surakarta. IAIN Surakarta.
  4. Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006
  5. Febtrina, R. (2019). A Pragmatics analysis of politeness strategies and cooperation principles in beauty and the beast movie. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 9(3), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0903010611
  6. Finegan, E. (2013). Language its structure and use (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  7. Gao, Bai., Zhou, Wei,. & Liu, W. (2021). Politeness , language and culture study of the relativity of politeness. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 537(Iclccs 2020), 212–215.
  8. Gay, L. R., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: competencies for anlaysis and applications (10th Editi). Pearson Education.
  9. Khosh, N. K. (2020). Politeness strategies in response to request in british and persian family discourse. 603–612. https://doi.org/10.47696/adved.202097
  10. Klegr, A. (2016). LINGUISTICA PRAGENSIA.
  11. Kushartanti, Yuwono, U., & Lauder, M. R. (2007). Pesona bahasa: langkah awal memahami linguistik. In pesona bahasa: langkah awal memahami linguistik (p. 58).
  12. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics (1st Editio). Longman.
  13. Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
  14. Minshew, L., & Anderson, J. (2015). Teacher self-efficacy in 1:1 ipad integration in middle school science and math classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 15(3), 7. http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=eue&AN=110495764&site=ehost-live
  15. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.1
  16. Phkiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. Bloomsbury.
  17. Pratama, H. (2019). Linguistic politeness in online communication (Issue November). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337153463
  18. Rash, F. (2013). Linguistic politeness and greeting rituals in German-speaking Switzerland. Linguistik Online, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.20.1063
  19. Santoso, W. J. (2014). Bentuk, faktor, skala kesantunan dalam penyampaian maksud. Journal University Sebelas Maret. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/pras.v0i0.522
  20. West, Richard & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: analysis and application (4th Editio). McGraw-Hill.
  21. Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd Edition). Open University Press.