Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 13, 2022
Accepted
September 3, 2022
Published
September 10, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 403 Download : 301

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Collaborative learning (CL) is a learning approach that emphasizes activities that are focused on the students. Interdependence, social behavior, cognitive development, and social psychology views may all be used to explain its effectiveness. The systematic review's purpose is to investigate effective influencing elements on CL insight from a social psychology perspective. The research was evaluated using a qualitative technique and then thematically analyzed. The findings break down the success of CL interactions into three categories: social cognition, social conduct, and connections. The social-psychological aspects of collaborative learning, according to our research, have also become an important component included in curricular practices. As a consequence, starting with pre-service and building on it with teacher professional development would be better. We suggest that in the twenty-first century, collaboration, rather than rivalry, is a power to survive, and vice versa.

Keywords

Collaborative learning perspective social-psychology.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of English Education and Teaching

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Nur, S., & Butarbutar, R. (2022). Insights of Collaborative Learning Approach from Social-Psychology Perspective: A Systematic Review. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 6(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.3.379-397
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Andersen, S. M., Saribay, S. A., & Przybylinski, E. (2012). Social cognition in close relationships. The SAGE Handbook of Social Cognition, 350–371.
  2. Appel, S. (1992). Defining social psychology. South African Journal of Sociology, 23(3), 77-83.
  3. Bergen, H. (n.d.). Normative and Informational Influence When Decision-Making in Groups Holly Bergen, Michael Dowd, Lidia Monjaras PSYC 166–Fall, 2012.
  4. Branscombe, N. R., & Baron, R. A. (2017). Social psychology (p. 528). New York, NY, USA: Pearson.
  5. Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022). ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 424–445.
  6. Landsheer, J. A., & Boeije, H. R. (2010). In search of content validity: Facet analysis as a qualitative method to improve questionnaire design. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 59-69.
  7. Bulkley, B. H., & Hutchins, G. M. (1977). Accelerated" atherosclerosis". A morphologic study of 97 saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts. Circulation, 55(1), 163-169.
  8. Butar-Butar, R. (2018). Analyzing nonverbal communication in seminar presentatioN. Magistra: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 038–047.
  9. Butarbutar, R. (2019). THE EFFECT OF CLEAN LIVING BEHAVIOR ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENTS’ACHIEVEMENT. Musamus Journal of Language and Literature, 1(02), 62–68.
  10. Butarbutar, R. (2021). Learner’s perception of task difficulties in technology-mediated task-based language teaching. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 129–144.
  11. Butarbutar, R., Sauhenda, A. F., Marnina, H. R., & Wahyuniar, S. M. R. L. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities of Accelerated Digital Literacy during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences.
  12. Casp, U. K. (2017). Critical appraisal skills programme (CASP). Qualitative Research Checklist, 31(13), 449.
  13. Chiu, C. Y., Krauss, R. M., & Lau, I. Y. (1998). Some cognitive consequences of communication. Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication, 259, 278.
  14. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2).
  15. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human relations, 2(2), 129-152.
  16. Doll, E. J. (1988). Review of Children’s social behavior: Development, assessment, and modification.
  17. Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 877.
  18. Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A. F., & Terwel, J. (2007). The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom: An introduction. The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, 1.
  19. Glynn, L. (2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech.
  20. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of educational research, 44(2), 213-240.
  21. Kenny, D. A. (1991). A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 98(2), 155.
  22. Leba, S. M. R., Butarbutar, R., & Werang, B. R. (2021). Exploring the English Learning Strategies of an Indigenous Papuan Student of Indonesia. Qualitative Report, 26(9).
  23. Medaille, A. (2018). Quiet Students' Experiences with Collaborative Learning at the Postsecondary Level (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno).
  24. Myers, D. G. (2016). A social psychology of the internet. 12(1), 3–9.
  25. Nur, S., & Butarbutar, R. (2022). Empowering EFL learner’s Self-efficacy through Collaborative task-based Instruction: A Critical Review. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(1), 118–129.
  26. Pepitone, A. (1976). Toward a normative and comparative biocultural social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 641.
  27. Piaget, J., & Kamii, C. (1978). What is psychology?. American Psychologist, 33(7), 648.
  28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
  29. Ross, J. (1995). Strategies for Enhancing Teachers. Teachers college record, 97(2), 227-251.
  30. Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Hershey, K. L. (1994). Temperament and social behavior in childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 21–39.
  31. Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (2002). Interfaces of social psychology with situated and embodied cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(3), 385–396.
  32. Slavin, R. E. (1977). Classroom reward structure: An analytical and practical review. Review of educational research, 47(4), 633-650.
  33. Strayhorn, T. L. (2015). Student development theory in higher education: A social psychological approach. Routledge.
  34. Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., & Thurston, A. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177–191.
  35. Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89.
  36. van Wesel, F., Boeije, H. R., & Alisic, E. (2015). Towards a method for synthesizing diverse evidence using hypotheses as common language. Quality & Quantity, 49(6), 2237–2249.
  37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
  38. Voulgari, I., & Komis, V. (2011). Collaborative learning in massively multiplayer online games: A review of social, cognitive and motivational perspectives. Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation through Educational Games: Multidisciplinary Approaches, 370–394.