Article Sidebar

Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 270 Download : 233

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is about local literature (folklore) and eco-literacy. It was conducted to find information of the alignment between folklore, literature learning in schools, and students' eco-literacy. This research used descriptive-qualitative research design. The data used for this research is in the form of answers from respondents about written questions that have been distributed online. Total respondents were 89 students from 5 schools (junior and senior high schools) in Bengkulu. Data analysis was conducted through data reduction, presentation (description), and conclusion. The findings of this study are, first, Junior and Senior High School students in Bengkulu like folklores from their district. Most of these students like legend’s type folklore compared to other type stories. Currently, folklores can still be found in the community, although it is not easy because the spoke person are old and many have died. The content of Bengkulu folklores has values or teachings about nature and ecosystem conservation. Second, local literature is taught in junior and senior high schools in Bengkulu. Students enjoy learning literature, especially local literature. The last, the level of environmental literacy among students is still relatively low. This can be seen by the lack of students' attention for waste and environmental conservation. In this regard, learning literature and folklore in schools is in line with students' eco-literacy competencies. However, this has not been implemented optimally, so it is hoped that local literature (folklore) can give contribution in nature and ecosystem conservations by increasing the eco-literacy of students and society.

Keywords

Eco-literacy folklore literature learning

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fitra Youpika, Sumiyadi, Tedi Permadi, Dadang Sunendar, Jenny Yandryati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Youpika, F., Sumiyadi, Permadi, T., Sunendar, D., & Yandryati, J. (2024). The Alignment of Folklore and Literature Learning in Schools Against Students’ Eco-literacy Competencies. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 8(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.8.1.88-105
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anggraini, N., Nurudin, N., & Rohman, S. (2022). The effectiveness of learning model of contextual writing poetry based on literary ecology. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 6(1), 142-157. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.1.142-157
  2. Arianto, T., & Simanjuntak, D. S. (2020). Representation of ecocriticism in the folklore of Mak Ungkai spirit. Studies in English Language and Education Journal, 7(2), 576-591. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16822
  3. Capra, F. (1997). The web of life. New York: Doubleday.
  4. Capra, F. 2013. Deep ecology: educational possibilities for the twenty-first century. The NAMTA Journal, 38(1), 201-216. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078054
  5. Drani, A., Adisaputera, A., & Wuriyani, E. P. (2021). Effectiveness of using folklore text-based learning media literacy in class x students of man Tg. Pura. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 377–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1625 377
  6. Fahmi, R. F. (2017). Mitos danau sebagai pelestari lingkungan [The myth of lakes as environmental preservers]. Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 65-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.33603/deiksis.v4i2.639
  7. Fajar, D. A. (2017). Eco-literacy through ecocriticism in Pekalongan folklore. The 2nd international conference on linguistics and language teaching (ICOLLATE). Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 73–78. https://icollate2017.uny.ac.id/
  8. Frankel, K. K., Becker, B. L. C., Rowe, M. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2016). From “what is reading?” to what is literacy?, Journal of Education, 196(3), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600303
  9. Hartati, T. (2017). Multimedia in literacy development at remote elementary schools in West Java. Edutech, 15(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.17509/edutech.v15i3.4873
  10. Latupeirissa, E., & Monaten, Y. G. (2021). Penguatan literasi melalui program revitalisasi sastra daerah di negeri waraka kecamatan Teluk Elpaputh Kabupaten Maluku Tengah [Strengthening literacy through the revitalization program of regional literature in Waraka Land, Teluk Elpaputh District, Central Maluku Regency]. Gaba-gaba: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dalam Bidang Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, 1(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.30598/gabagabavol1iss1pp10-15
  11. McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, eco-literacy: What do we mean and how did we get here?, Ecosphere, 4(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1
  12. Paembonan, H. (2020). Peran karya sastra bagi pelestarian lingkungan (ekologi sastra [The role of literary works in environmental conservation (Ecology of literature). Kantor Bahasa Maluku. https://kantorbahasamaluku.kemdikbud.go.id/2020/06/peran-karya-sastra-bagi-pelestarian-lingkungan-ekologi-sastra/
  13. Risdianto, F., Machfudz, M., Sagimin, E. M., Hanafi, H., & Jumanto, J. (2023). Politeness and impoliteness strategies in lecturer-student communication within cyberpragmatic chats. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 5(1), 107-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v5i1.107-134
  14. Syafryadin, S., & Boulahnane, S. (2021). Immersing japanese students into english language learning: songs, games, and cultures. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40 (3), 554–563. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.37153
  15. Slameto. (2015). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya [Learning and its influencing factors]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  16. Sumiyadi. (2021). Kesusastraan Indonesia: teori, pengkajian, dan model pembelajaran [Indonesian literature: theory, study, and learning models]. Bandung: UPI Press.
  17. Sunendar, D., Hardini, T. I., & Karimah, I. S. (2021, November). Self-literacy synectic writing model and challenge on 21st century skills. In Fifth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2021). Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 163-169. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211119.026
  18. Supriatna, N., & Sapriya, S. (2018). Pengenalan eco-literacy melalui media pembelajaran dari sampah di sekolah dasar. Al-Mudarris: Journal of Education, 1(2), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.32478/al-mudarris.v1i2.171
  19. Permadi, T. (2006). Teks, tekstologi, dan kritik teks [Texts, Textology, and Textual Criticism]. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Press.
  20. Wijaya, W. B., Prathiwi, K. J. R., & Muliani, N. M. (2021). Pengembangan literasi ekologi siswa sekolah dasar [Development of elementary school students' ecological literacy]. Adi Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v6i1.2115
  21. Wijdaniyah, E. J., Hasanah, M., & Dermawan, T. (2022). Nilai lokalitas budaya Madura dalam cerpen-cerpen karya Muna Masyari [The value of Madura cultural locality in Muna Masyari's short stories]. LITERA, 21(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v21i1.47228
  22. World Economic Forum. Available at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/21st-century-skills-future-jobs-students/. (Accessed 27 May 2023).
  23. Yektiningtyas, W. (2019). Igniting folktales as children’s learning sources in Sentani Jayapura Papua. Litera, 18(1), 105-117. http://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v18i1.18841
  24. Zuliyanti, & Doyin, M. (2020). The optimization of folklore in literature learning as a strengthener of student literacy culture. The Third International Seminar on Recent Language, Literature, and Local Culture Studies. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-9-2019.2296852
  25. Youpika, F., & Hiasa, F. (2021). Analisis karakter tokoh dalam cerita prosa rakyat etnik Bengkulu untuk materi pembelajaran sastra [Character analysis of characters in bengkulu ethnic folk prose for literature learning material]. Jurnal Ilmiah KORPUS, 5(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v5i1.15646
  26. Youpika, F., Permadi, T., Sumiyadi, & Sunendar, D. (2023). Ungkapan kemarahan masyarakat etnis Pasemah Bengkulu: Kajian tradisi lisan sebagai sarana kontrol sosial [Expressions of anger in the Pasemah ethnic society of Bengkulu: A study of oral tradition as a means of social control]. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 25(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v25.n1.p50-56.2023