Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 191 Download : 122

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This quasi-experimental research was aimed to find out the effect of STAD technique toward students’ speaking skill and class participation at grade XI of SMAN 5 Kota Bengkulu in academic year of 2011/2012. The population of this research was the students at grade XI of SMAN 5 Kota Bengkulu in academic year of 2010/2011 that consisted of 168 students. The sample of this research was IPA 4 which comprised 27 students and IPA 5 which comprised 27 students and the two classes were cluster randomly selected as a research sample. The data were collected through speaking test and observation sheet of class participation. The data were then analyzed by using t-test and analysis of variances.  The findings of this research showed that (1) the students who were taught by using STAD technique gave significant effect toward their speaking skill achievement. (2) The students who were taught by using STAD technique gave significant effect toward their class participation. (3) The students who were taught by using STAD technique gave significant effect toward students’ speaking skill and class participation. Thus, it can be concluded that STAD technique gave significant effect toward students’ speaking skill and class participation at grade XI of SMAN 5 Kota Bengkulu in academic year of 2011/2012.

Keywords

STAD Technique Speaking Skill Class Participation.

Article Details

License
Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Kurniawan, I., ., M., & Rozimela, Y. (2017). THE EFFECT OF STUDENT TEAMS-ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) TECHNIQUE TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL AND CLASS PARTICIPATION. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.1.1.35-47
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Battistich,V&Watson,M.(2003).Fostering Social Development in preschool and the early elementary grades through co-operative classroom activities. In Robby M. Gillies, Andrian F. Ashman (Eds). Co-operative Learning: The Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Group. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  2. Bean,J.C & Peterson,D. (2005).Grading classroom participation” Google Search. Retrieved on October 15th, 2011 from http:// www.docjax.com
  3. Brown,H.D. (2004). Langauge assessment: Principles and classroom Practices. San Fransisco: Pearson Education
  4. Brown,G & Yule, G.(1999). Teaching the spoken language (2nded). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Cieniewicz,J. (2008). Participation blues from the student perspective”. The teaching professor newsletter. Retrieved on September 15th, 2010 from http:// www.docjax.com
  6. Dmin,G.S. (1998). The small group approach in the teaching process. The 22nd International Faith and Learning Seminar held at Seminar Schloss Bogenhofen Austria - August 1998. Retrieved on September 4¬th 2012 from http://docjax.com
  7. Gillies,R. M & Ashman, A. F. (2003). An historical review of the use of groups to promote socialization and learnning. In Robby M. Gillies, Andrian F. Ashman (Eds). Co-operative Learning: The Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Group. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  8. Griffiths, C.(2008).Lesson from Good Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Harmer, J. (2008). How to teach English. Beijing: Pearson Longman
  10. Hedge, T. (2008). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Beijing: Oxford University Press
  11. Johnson,R.T &Johnson, D.W. (1975). Creating positive climate cooperative learning. Retrieved on September 3rd, 2011 from http:// www.indiana.edu/-safeschl
  12. Jollife,W.(2007). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: Putting it into Practice. Den Haag: Cromwell Press.
  13. Jones,R. C. (2008). The way of class participation: A question worth asking. College Teaching Journal. Vol.56.No.1.Retrieved on July13th, 2011 from http: //docjax.com.
  14. Kayi,H. (2006). Teaching speaking: Activities to promote in second language. The internet TESL Journal, vol.XII, II.Retrieved on July, 25th, 2011 from http://iteslj.org/article/kayi-teaching speaking.html
  15. Knight,D.D.(2008).Assessing class participation one useful strategy. The TeachingProfessor Newsletter.Retrieved on September 15th, 2010 from http://www. doxjac.com
  16. Maznevski, M. L (1996). Grading class participation .Retrieved on June 25th, 2012 from http://trc.virginia.edu
  17. Millis, B.J. (2002). Cooperative learning. Grayson H. Walker Teaching Resource Center.The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Retrieved on September 4th, 2012 from http://www. docjax.com
  18. O’Malley, J M & Pierece, L.V. 1996. Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners: Practical Approach for Teachers. Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  19. Bean,J C. & Peterson, D. (2005). Grading classroom participation. Teacher Focus Journal. Retrieved on March 23th, 2011 from http://www.doxjax.com
  20. Richard,J.C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. Washington D.C: Cambridge University Press.
  21. _____________.(2005). Current trends in teaching listening and speaking. ELT The Teacher Journal. Retrieved on May 25th,2011 from http://www.oup.com/elt
  22. _____________.(2008).Teaching Listening and Speaking from Theory to Practice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. _____________ (2008). Teaching speaking theories and methodologies. Retrieved on June 15th, 2011 from http://.fltrp.com.
  24. ______________.(2009). Teaching Listening and Speaking From Theory to Practice.Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
  25. Rogers,A. (1996). Teaching Adult. Philladelphia: Open University Press
  26. Slavin,R.E. (2005). Cooperative Learning (2nded) New York: Allyn and Bacon
  27. Sullo,B. (2009). The Motivated Student Unlocking the Enthusiasm for Learning. Washington DC: ASCD.
  28. Syafryadin, I. N. R., & Widiastuti, R. (2013). Improving grade X students’ speaking achievement under Round Robin technique. International Journal on Education, 1(1).
  29. Syafryadin, S., Nurkamto, J., Linggar, D. A., & Mujiyanto, J. (2017). ACTIVE, BELIEF, AND CONSEQUENCE (ABC) MODEL TECHNIQUE IN MINIMIZING STUDENTS’SPEECH ANXIETY. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 5, 320-324.
  30. Terry,C. (2008). How to teach speaking in an EFL class”. The Journal of ICPNA San-Migue. Retrieved on July 13th, 2011 fromhttp://www. docjax.com
  31. Thornburry,S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Longman
  32. Tyler, J. (2010). Class participation assessment guidelines. Harriet W. Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning.Retrieved on July 11th, 2011from http://www.docjax.com
  33. Weimer,M. (2008). Those students who participate too much. The Teaching Professor Newsletter.Retrieved on September 15th, 2010 from http://www.docjax.com.
  34. Weir,C.J.(1990) .Communicative Language Testing. New York: Prentice Hall