Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 39 Download : 9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of the Carousel Brainstorming strategy on students' critical reading comprehension. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining a quantitative quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design with qualitative action research. The sample consisted of 30 students selected through purposive sampling, divided into an experimental and a control group.The quantitative findings indicated that the use of the Carousel Brainstorming strategy significantly improved students' critical reading comprehension, with a two-tailed significance of p=0.015. The effect size, as measured by Partial Eta Squared, was 0.610, representing a moderate effect (61%). The qualitative results further supported this finding, showing a progressive increase in students' average critical reading comprehension scores from an initial 43.3% to 53.3% after the first cycle and 73.3% after the second cycle.This research demonstrates that the Carousel Brainstorming strategy is an effective and viable method for enhancing students' critical reading skills. The findings have implications for educators, suggesting that this strategy can be incorporated into teaching practices to improve students' critical thinking and reading abilities.

Keywords

Carousel brainstorming critical reading revolution 5.0

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Yusrizal Yusrizal, Ferri Susanto, Ildi Kurniawan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Yusrizal, Y., Susanto, F., & Kurniawan, I. (2025). The Impact of Implementing the Carousel Brainstorming Strategy to Improve Students’ Critical Reading Comprehension in Revolution 5.0. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 9(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.9.3.437-458
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adryan, A, Z. (2023). Study of Color, Atmosphere, and Furniture in Architectural Studio Classroom: Perspective from Mix-Methods Research. Vitruvian: Jurnal Arsitektur, Bangunan Dan Lingkungan, 13(31 Oct 2023). https://doi.org/10.22441/vitruvian
  2. Agresti, Alan, et al. (2023). Categorical Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Baranova N.M. (n.d.). Tools for studying the digital development rates of economic systems at country and region level. RUDN Journal of Economics, 31, 687–699. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2023-31-4-687-699
  4. Brookhart, S. M. (2022). Assessing Student Learning: From Tests to Teaching. Routledge.
  5. Bryman, Alan. (2023). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
  6. Cho, B Y., Hwang, H, and Jang B G. (2021). Predicting fourth grade digital reading comprehension: A secondary data analysis of (e)PIRLS 2016. International Journal of Educational Research, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101696
  7. Cho, H, Y. (2021). Normality Test of the Water Quality Monitoring Data in Harbour. Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 33(April 30, 2021), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2021.33.2.53
  8. Carousel l, Robert. (2023). The Carousel Brainstorming Strategy: A New Approach to Generating Creative Ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 556-566.
  9. Dulgheriu, I., Ionesi, S, D at all. (2022). ANCOVA analysis of penetration force on Kevlar fabrics used for ballistic protective equipment. Industria Textila, 73(05 Mar 2022), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.35530/IT.073.01.202197
  10. Garson, G. David, et al. (2022). Research Methods for Social Sciences. Sage Publications.
  11. Graham, M, K. (2024). Assessing the impact of pre-lecture reading compliance on lecture comprehension in English-medium instruction courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68(March 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101367
  12. Habók, A., Tun Zaw Oo and Magyar, A. (2024). The effect of reading strategy use on online reading comprehension. Heliyon, 10(30 January 2024, e24281). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24281
  13. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2023). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Sage.
  14. Hutton, C, M. (2023). From Acoustic Space to the Global Village: Linearity and the Western Intellectual Imagination. DeGruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110798494-005
  15. Jenkins, A, M. (2023). Hospital Pediatrics, November 09 2023. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2022-007110
  16. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2024). Mixed methods research: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
  17. Khoirurrijal. (2023). Stakeholders’ perception of vision, mission, objectives, and its implications on curriculum development. An nabighoh, 25(August 2023), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.32332/an-nabighoh.v25i2.7485
  18. Li, X., Xue, J, T and et all. (2023). Think Outside the Code: Brainstorming Boosts Large Language Models in Code Generation. Computer Science Artificial Intelligence, 18 May 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.10679
  19. Lin Wu., Valcke, M, and Keer, V H. (2023). Differential effects of reading strategy intervention for three levels of comprehenders: Focus on text comprehension and autonomous reading motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 104(May 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102290
  20. Lin, Y., Yu, Z. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(16 June 2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
  21. Marks, D, F. (2023). The Action Cycle Theory of Perception and Mental Imagery. Vision, 7(14 February 2023), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision7010012
  22. McWhorter, M. (2023). Critical Reading: A Guide for Students. Routledge.
  23. Moghadam, Z.B., Narafshan, M.H. & Tajadini, M. (2023). The effect of implementing a critical thinking intervention program on English language learners’ critical thinking, reading comprehension, and classroom climate. Asian. J. Second. Foreign. Lang. Educ., 8(15 (2023).). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00188-3
  24. Nyimbili, F and , L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(16-02–2024). https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
  25. Perrenoud, G., Geese and et all. (2023). Mixed methods instrument validation: Evaluation procedures for practitioners developed from the validation of the Swiss Instrument for Evaluating Interprofessional Collaboration. BMC Health Services Research, 25 January 2023, 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913 023 09040 3
  26. Psyridou, M., Ruotsalainen,J and et all. (2024). Family factors and critical reading skills: A systematic review. PsyArXiv, June 20, 2024, 2–89. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m8z7y
  27. Qi, H., Rizopoulos, D and Rosmalen,J, V. (2022). Incorporating historical control information in ANCOVA models using the meta-analytic-predictive approach. Research Syntesis Methods, 13(6)(7 April 2022), 681-696. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1561
  28. Qin, Z., Wang, C and et all. (2024). Brainstorming Brings Power to Large Language Models of Knowledge Reasoning. Computer Science Computation and Language, 02 Jun 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.06561
  29. Roa, R, C. (2024). Critical Reading inside a Cross-curricular Approach. HOW, 31(Mar 4, 2024), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.31.1.652
  30. Sharma , L., R. (2022). Dealing with Crucial Aspects of Action Research. International Research Journal of MMC, 3(2022-12–28).