Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 19 Download : 13

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Online peer feedback on writing has been studied by many scholars to examine the applications, the effectiveness, the weaknesses, and the students' perceptions in the context of learning English for general purposes, but little attention has been paid to its use in the area of English for specific purposes. The present study aims to reveal the Economics students’ experiences with the use of online peer feedback in writing. This study was designed as a mixed-method inquiry that involved 140 Economics students at a university in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia, who took English courses. The data was gathered using a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview, which were analyzed based on each type, quantitatively and qualitatively, to reach the objective of the study. The results show that economics students viewed the use of online peer feedback in writing activities very positively. The results of this research contribute theoretically and practically to encouraging the use of online peer feedback in improving student effectiveness and skills.

Keywords

English for Specific Purposes (ESP) English Writing Online Learning Peer feedback students' perspective

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Sufiyandi Sufiyandi, Emi Emilia , Ika Lestari Damayanti , Ira Maisarah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Sufiyandi, S., Emilia , E., Damayanti , I. L., & Maisarah , I. (2025). Online Peer Feedback on English Writing: The Economics Students’ Voices. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 9(3), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.9.3.418-436
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aben, J. E., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., Lara, M. M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2022). What influences students' peer feedback uptake? Relations between error tolerance, feedback tolerance, writing self-efficacy, perceived language skills, and peer-feedback processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 97, 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102175
  2. Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge
  3. Cao, S., Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Zhou, T., & Xu, Y. (2022). A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on English writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1035803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035803
  4. Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2013). Peer feedback to facilitate project-based learning in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 258-276. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1524
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  6. Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. A. (2010). Academic Literacy: The Importance and Impact of Writing across the Curriculum--A Case Study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34-47. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890711.pdf
  7. Dou, A. Q., Chan, S. H., & Win, M. T. (2023). Changing visions in ESP development and teaching: Past, present, and future vistas. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1140659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140659
  8. Double, K. S., Mcgrane, J. A., and Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. The impact of peer assessment 32, 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648- 019-09510-3
  9. Elfiyanto, S., & Fukazawa, S. (2020). Effect of teacher and peer written corrective feedback on writing components in EFL classrooms. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5 (2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.826
  10. Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., ... & Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x
  11. Falhasiri, M., & Hasiri, F. (2020). Corrective feedback in second language writing: from theory and research to practice. CONTACT Magazine, 21-34. Retrieved from: https://contact.teslontario.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Falhasiri-Hasiri.pdf
  12. Fitria, T. N. (2019). Business English as a part of teaching English for specific purposes (ESP) to economic students. Jurnal Education and Economics (JEE), 2(02).
  13. Gasevic, D., Siemens, G., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning.https://researchmgt.monash.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/256525723/256524746_oa.pdf
  14. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. W. (2000). Student guide to accompany educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Merill.
  15. Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the peer-feedback process through instructional support: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3
  16. Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students' peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions, and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955-968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
  17. Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2019). A questionnaire to assess students' beliefs about peer feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57:3, 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1630294
  18. Kourbani, V. (2017). Writing center asynchronous/synchronous online feedback: The relationship between e-feedback and its impact on student satisfaction, learning, and textual revision. In R. Aaron & R. K. S. Amant (Eds.), Thinking globally, composing locally: Rethinking online writing in the age of the global Internet (pp. 233–256). Utah State University Press.
  19. Kurniawan, D., Jaya, H.P., & Wijaya, A. (2023). EFL Learners' Experiences of Peer Feedback in Paragraph Writing Through Cloud Collaboration. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 10(1), 37-62. 10.15408. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v10i1.25134
  20. Kusumaningrum, S. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2019). The Effect of Different Types of Peer Feedback Provision on EFL Students' Writing Performance. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12114a
  21. Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005
  22. LeClair-Smith, C., Branum, B., Bryant, L., Cornell, B., Martinez, H., Nash, E., & Phillips, L. (2016). Peer-to-peer feedback: a novel approach to nursing quality, collaboration, and peer review. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 46(6), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005
  23. Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
  24. Lerchenfeldt, S., Mi, M., & Eng, M. (2019). The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z
  25. Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students' perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ944900.pdf
  26. Liu, E. Z. F., & Lee, C. Y. (2013). Using peer feedback to improve learning via online peer assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(1), 187-199.
  27. Liu, J. & J. Hansen (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  28. Lv, X., Ren, W., & Xie, Y. (2021). The effects of online feedback on ESL/EFL writing: A meta-analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00594-6
  29. Ma, Q. (2020). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1556703
  30. Ma, Q. (2020). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1556703
  31. Mahvelati, E. H. (2021). Learners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher corrective feedback conditions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 100995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995
  32. McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615
  33. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 39(1), 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
  34. Nulty, D. D. (2011). Peer and self‐assessment in the first year of university. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 36(5), 493-507.
  35. Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43, 591-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x
  36. Peterson, S. S. (2013). Peer feedback on writing: An assessment for learning. Research for Teacher.
  37. Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020). Electronic peer feedback, EFL academic writing, and reflective thinking: Evidence from a Confucian context. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914554
  38. Putra, I. G. K. M., Santosa, M. H., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2021). Students’ perceptions on online peer feedback practice in EFL writing. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 8(2), 213-231. https:// https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21488
  39. Rahayu, N. S. (2022). Students'responses in online peer feedback in EFL writing instruction. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 14(2), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2022.14.2.371-383
  40. Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Holistic Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.03010
  41. Rimmer, W. (2020). Responding to the coronavirus with open educational resources. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.03
  42. Rosyanova, T. S. (2016). Color-Symbolism in English Economc Terminology. Administrative Consulting, (3). Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/yid285.html
  43. Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2021). Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: Students’ perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 1100-1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
  44. Simonsmeier, B. A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer feedback improves students’ academic self-concept in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 61, 706-724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09591-y
  45. Topalov*, j., Knežević, L. & Rešetar, S.H. (2023). How anxious are online esp learners? Exploring students’ anxiety in video, audio, and text-based communication in an online classroom. ESP Today-Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level. 11 (2), 395-416. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2023.11.2.10
  46. Tillema, H., Leenknecht, M., & Segers, M. (2011). Assessing assessment quality: Criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning–A review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004
  47. Yang, M. & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback process. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
  48. Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study. Assessing Writing, 33, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004
  49. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 572-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541714
  50. Yusuf, F. N., Widiati, U., & Sulistyo, T. (2017). Multimodal feedback provision in improving pre-service teachers' competence. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8126
  51. Wong, B. S. H., & Shorey, S. (2022). Nursing students' experiences and perception of peer feedback: A qualitative systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 105469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105469
  52. Zhang, M., He, Q., Du, J., Liu, F., & Huang, B. (2022). Learners’ perceived advantages and social-affective dispositions toward online peer feedback in academic writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 973478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973478
  53. Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586
  54. Zheng, X., Luo, L., & Liu, C. (2023). Facilitating Undergraduates’ Online Self-Regulated Learning: The Role of Teacher Feedback. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(6), 805-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00697-8