Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was aimed to find out the student feedback on teacher Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic learning styles model in the English class. This research was conducted by using questionnaire patterns to reveal students’ point of view on their teacher’s performance consisted of a total of 25 closed-ended statements and utilized a Five-Point Likert Scale. The data was obtained from the questionnaire given by 135 students of 8th-grade from five different classes. Based on the data obtained, the results indicated that auditory strategies received the highest positive response at 90%, followed by kinesthetic activities at 93%, and visual strategies at 87%. The result obtained was shown that, kinesthetic strategies were found to increase student engagement significantly, with students validating the positive influence of proactive teacher attitudes in facilitating comprehension during English lessons. Auditory feedback emphasized students' ability to effectively absorb information through multi-sensory input, especially when auditory elements were integrated with kinesthetic learning. Visual strategies received moderately positive feedback because teachers only used traditional tools for visual-based teaching. It can be concluded that English teachers should improve and diversify their learning methods by integrating more interactive visuals, strengthening multi-sensory auditory practices, and continuing to apply engaging kinesthetic techniques to enhance student learning outcomes.

Keywords

English teacher performance student feedback VAK learning model visual strategy auditory technique kinesthetic activity

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Ikhsan, Muhammad Fadhli, Hilda Puspita

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Ikhsan, M., Fadhli, M., & Puspita, H. (2025). Evaluating English Teacher Performance at SMPN 31 Bengkulu Utara from the Student’s Point of View. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 9(3), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.9.3.501-514
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  2. Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  4. Derakhshan, A., Coombe, C., Zhaleh, K., & Tabatabaeian, M. (2022). Examining the role of teachers’ interpersonal variables in predicting EFL students’ academic engagement: A structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 841597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841597
  5. Icha, M. A., Melanie, M., & Nashir, I. (2021). Student’s Perception Towards English Teacher Performance in Teaching English at the Eighth Grade of SMPN 6 Lubuk Basung. English Linguistics and Language Teaching Research Journal, 2(1), 33-46.
  6. John, W.C, 2012. Educational Research (Planning, conducting and evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research). Pearson Education: United State of America.
  7. Kusumawarti, E., Subiyantoro, S., & Rukayah. (2020). The effectiveness of visualization, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) model toward writing narrative: Linguistic intelligence perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13442a
  8. Mulyasa. 2008. Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru, Cetakan ketiga. Penerbit: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung
  9. Mustafa, F., Nguyen, H., & Gao, A. (2024). The challenges and solutions of technology integration in rural schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 126, 102380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380
  10. Parmawati, A. (2018). USING ANALYTIC TEAMS TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENT’SENGLISH SKILL. Edulitics (Education, Literature, And Linguistics) Journal, 3(2), 21-25.
  11. Ritah, 2018. Student perception on Teacher Characteristic in Teaching English (A Descriptive Research at Eight Grade of SMP Pesantren Guppi Samata Gowa). Guided by Nur Qalbi and Radiah Hamid.
  12. Saleem, Z., & Hussain, A. H. A. (2021). Gender Differences in VAK Learning Style Model and Academic Performance. The Dialogue, 16(2), 66-76.
  13. Sartika, M., Hatim, M., & Rosmiyati, E. (2023). The Correlation of Learning Style and English Achievement of the Students of Nurul Huda Senior High School. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(2), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i2.12310
  14. Shaleh, A. R. (2008). Psikologi Suatu Pengantar Dalam Prespektif Islam.
  15. Sugiyono. (2007). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung : CV. Alfab.
  16. Sugiyono.(2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  17. Syofyan, R., & Siwi, M. K. (2018). The impact of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on economics education teaching. In Proceedings of the First Padang International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (pp. 642–649). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba 18.2018.17
  18. Thamrin, E. (2020). A study of student’s perceptions of English teacher pedagogical competence. EnJourMe (English Journal Of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, And Teaching Of English, 5(1), 84–91. doi:10.26905/enjourme.v5i1.4104
  19. Usuluddin, U., Fikni, Z., Husnu, M., & Nadia, R. (2024). Exploring The Impact of Kinesthetic Learning Strategies on Speaking Ability: A Study for Integrating Movement and English Language. Culturalistics: Journal of Cultural, Literary, and Linguistic Studies, 8(2), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.14710/ca.v8i2.24128