Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 26 Download : 14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

English language learning in high schools in Indonesia still focuses on theory, namely memorizing tenses, practicing grammar, and sentence structure, while communicative skills such as spontaneous speaking and real-life interactions receive very little attention. Previous research shows that students feel low on confidence and limited facilities and practice time. Psychological aspects such as self-confidence, student learning styles, technology integration, and authentic assessment are still rarely an integral part of teaching material design. This study aims to map best practices and weaknesses in the development of constructivist-based English teaching materials in high schools, with an integrative focus on the use of technology, variations in student learning styles, and authentic assessment, so that students' communication skills and confidence are improved. The method used is a literature review from 2018-2024 from national and international journals, proceedings, and research reports. This study uses thematic analysis techniques and framework analysis. The main findings indicate that approaches such as PjBL and CTL that involve projects, simulations, discussions, and real-life interactions can increase student engagement, creativity, critical thinking, and self-confidence. The integration of technology as a learning medium is indeed appealing, but its implementation has not been optimal in supporting authentic communication. Diversity in learning styles strengthens the effectiveness of teaching materials, and authentic assessments help measure students' actual abilities. This study fills a gap in the local literature by combining aspects of technology, learning styles, and authentic assessment within a single framework.

Keywords

constructivism English teaching materials senior high school

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Hery Nuraini, Nurhaedah Gailea, Udi Samanhudi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Nuraini, H., Gailea, N., & Samanhudi, U. (2025). Exploring Constructivism in the Context of English Material Development for Senior High Schools: A Literature Review Approach. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 9(3), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.9.3.459-470
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bui, T. H. (2022). English teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100204
  2. Dethan, Y. D., & Modok, R. H. (2024). Keefektifan Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa. Bilingual : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 6(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.36985/fpa4f475
  3. Irsyad, S. F., Zaim, M., & Thahar, H. E. (2024). Constructivism Epistemology and the Application of Project- Based Learning in the Independent Curriculum for English Language Learning. International Conference on Language Pedagogy, 4(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.24036/icolp.v4i1.190 Constructivism
  4. Jasrial, D., & M. Zaim. (2023). Constructivism For English Language Teaching In The 21st Century In The Indonesian Context: Library Research. Journal of English Education and Linguistics, 7(7), 157–166.
  5. Kamsiah, Daulay, M. I., & Ediputra, K. (2024). Pengaruh Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Terhadap Penguasaan Kosa Kata dan Kemampuan Menulis Bahasa Inggris di SMP Negeri 10 Bengkalis The Influence of the Contextual Teaching and Learning Model on Vocabulary Mastery and English Writing Ability at. JIIC: Journal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(8), 3047–7824.
  6. Lukman, L., Furkan, F., & Syfril, S. (2024). Implementasi Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. EL-Muhbib Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.52266/el-muhbib.v8i1.3192
  7. Maulidawati, Muhammad, I., Rohantizani, & Mursalin. (2020). The Implementation of Make A Match Type Cooperative Learning Model to Improve the Mathematical Connection Ability. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(11), 952–960. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i11.3319
  8. Nursiah. (2021). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Inkuiri dan Ekspositori terhadap Keterampilan Berbicara Bahasa Inggris dan Percaya Diri Siswa SMK Negeri 3 Singkawang. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL REVIEW AND RESEARCH, 4(2), 85–92.
  9. Perumal, K., & Ajit, I. (2022). A Descriptive Study on the Effect of Blogs on Writing Skill Development Using Social Constructivism as a Theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(8), 1537–1544. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.09
  10. Saragih, B., & Dewi, N. R. (2024). Innovative Course Lecture in Creative Arts: A Project-Based Learning (PjBL 4.0) Enriching 4cs Competencies. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 8(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/jeet.8.4.831-860
  11. Silvia, S. (2018). Development of Project Based-Learning English Learning Materials for High School Students. Tekno - Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 8(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.22437/teknopedagogi.v8i1.32716
  12. Srour, K., Aqel, M., & Abu Shawish, J. I. (2021). Enhancing EFL secondary school students’ writing skills through a suggested model based on constructivism. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23937
  13. Sudarman, R., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Setiana, S. M. (2024). Constructivism in Writing Learning in Elementary School; Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Research and Applied Technology, 4(1), 176–192.
  14. Suwarni, A., & Natsir, N. (2024). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Berbasis Proyek dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berbicara Bahasa Inggris Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Internasional, 1(4), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijer.v1i4.283
  15. Syafitri, A., Yundayani, A., Kala, W., Stkip, K., & Negara, K. (2019). Hubungan antara Kepercayaan Diri Siswa terhadap Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Inggris. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara, 1–8.
  16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  17. Wang, J., & Curran, N. M. (2025). Competing for Views and Students: The Implications of Platformization for OnlineLanguage Teaching. Tesol Quarterly, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3354
  18. Wiranata, S., Nasrullah, & Asrimawati, I. F. (2024). Investigating Technology Integration In English Language Instruction From 2018 To 2024: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE), 5(2), 146–158. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jetle/article/view/26439/pdf
  19. Yasa, I. G. S., Wedayanthi, L. M. D., & Suparwati, M. D. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Bahasa Inggris Siswa Sma Negeri 1 Susut-Bali. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 10(3), 330–338.